Pajak Jan for MP in 2014 NZ - to bridge gaps between people
(a report from the history, course and outcomes of the author's 2014 election campaign)
(in English and
Polish )
Updated: 2024/2/29
The latest updates: #D1ab, menu
Menu 1:
(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
Introduction:
As a scientist experienced in identifying and utilising regularities
which hide in areas where other people just see a "chaos",
I have noticed that a lot of ill-fortunes is heading towards New
Zealand, Poland and the rest of world. Therefore I volunteered
to fulfil the patriotic duty by offering my knowledge and
skills in service for the preventing these ill-fortunes from eventuating.
The most morally correct way of offering such service aimed at the
prevention, was to stand for the NZ parliamentary election in 2014 -
as it gave to others the choice to accept or to reject my offer.
After all the philosophy which I created and named
Totalizm
states that: "people must NOT be make
happy forcibly, means against their free will that was given to them
by God". So this web page is my report from the history,
course and outcomes of my contribution to 2014 election - while results
of the 2014 election are provided in item #L2 near the end of this web
page. (Note, however, that there is already prepared another web page, named
pajak_re_2017.htm -
which was intended for the next NZ elections of 2017. The essence of
this another web page can be expressed by the motto from item #G1
of it, stating - quote: "Democracy is currently
the most perfect political system which the humanity has implemented
for itself so-far - but if the democracy is enriched by a strict adherence
to moral laws and to moral criteria, then it would become even a more
perfect political system." Starting from its "part #A", means
after three large stars (***) of red colour,
I leave this report in the form it was originally published on this web page
during my preparations for the elections 2014 – but notice that after 20 September
2014 this web page ceased to fulfil the previous function of my "electoral
announcement".
I decided to update this "introduction" at the beginning
of 2020, because in the meantime its menus become
outdated, and also because developments in the world's
situation have significantly exacerbated the dangers
which New Zealand, Poland and the rest of world confronts,
as the date of arrival of these dangers approaches
even closer. In the meantime, these dangers have also
been described in more detail on my web page named
2030_uk.htm
and illustrated on a Polish-language free YouTube video entitled
Zagłada ludzkości 2030
(which title means "The Great Purification of 2030s").
One among countless manifestations of the
incoming of these dangers is an deadly outbreak of
coronavirus pandemic
in China on 2019/12/8, which two months later already
spread to almost the whole world - and yet it is NOT
the most dangerous among of what can come after it.
On the other hand, in order to protect both individual
people and the whole country from falling victims to
these dangers, a leader with the required knowledge
of God, wisdom, courage and vision is needed -
but there is still no such person among today's politicians.
That is why I remind you that the Bible contains an
example of the city of Nineveh (see verses
3:4-10 from the Biblical "Book of Jonah" and 10:5-19
from the "Book of Isaiah"), which documents that
through the proper actions of the wise leader of the
country, God's forgiveness can be earned for even a
whole country, and also that since 2006/1/11 there
is available to everyone the published description of
the probably ideal "nirvana
political system" - a summary of features
and advantages of which the reader will find in items
#A1 to #A4 from the page named the
partia_totalizmu_uk.htm.
In turn efforts to implement this "nirvana political system"
are subject to such requirements and conditions that
they provide the implementing it young people almost
a guarantee that God will help them survive the incoming
"The Great Purification" - so that they are able to implement
this political system after "The Great Purification" passes to
history.
* * *
The content of this web page is authorized by
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
that is by a researcher, discoverer and inventor
of New Zealand and Poland and
WorldCat Identity
(see the web page http://worldcat.org/identities/),
the course of whose life is briefly described at the autobiographical web page
pajak_jan_uk.htm.
By profession Dr Eng. Jan Pająk is an academic teacher who
lectured and carried out research at 10 tertiary educational
institutions of the world where he lectured numerous subjects
in two different disciplines, i.e. in the discipline of Mechanical
Engineering and Machine Construction, first at his native
Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
then at the universities of New Zealand (Canterbury),
Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) and Borneo (Kuching), as
well as in the discipline of Software Engineering and
Programming Languages at four New Zealand tertiary
educational institutions (i.e. at Invercargill College,
Dunedin University, Timaru Polytechnic, and Wellington
Institute of Technology) and at universities in Cyprus
(Famagusta) and Korea (Suwon). At as many as four
among these universities (i.e. at universities in Cyprus,
Malaysia, Borneo and Korea) he was employed as
university professor. In the early part of the 21st
century, Dr Eng. Jan Pająk distinguished himself
from the group of still alive at that time discoverers
and inventors who simultaneously were citizens of
Poland and/or New Zealand, that he became among
them the most widely known in the world, most
variously interpreted, and moreover, the most productive -
in spite of conducting his research without funding and
on the principles of alleged a private scientific "hobby",
forced by the official disapproval of the areas of knowledge
and truth he researches, and in spite that the results of
his research constitute knowledge and truth that in present
world is one of the most fiercely overpowered and blocked
from getting known by people.
Only a brief illustration and summary of the most important
of his discoveries, inventions and scientifically indisputable
formal proofs with the use of teaching movies, required
the preparation of a series of half-hour video presentations
available for free on the Internet: either in three languages,
namely i.e. in Polish, English and German, all of which listed
from newest to oldest are linked from the web page named
djp.htm -
examples of which can be: the movie entitled
"Dr Jan Pajak portfolio"
while the English version of which can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXr2OzVsMp4
and the movie entitled
"Future Propulsions"
the English-language version of which
is disseminated from the address
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxSWDbFopak;
or English and German 4-minute video
"How big is the Magnocraft"
disseminated from the address
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkqrVePSj6c;
or videos disseminated with narration in Polish but with
subtitles in English - for example the quest movie entitled
"Świat bez pieniędzy: Ustrój nirwany",
the title of which means "The Nirvana System: World That Rid Of Money", available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9YFI6Fer9E
and the warning movie entitled
"Zagłada ludzkości 2030",
the title of which means "The Massive Purification of Humanity in 2030s", available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o06UvHgahr8
(note that these English subtitles can be turned "on" or "off"
by clicking on the icon "cc", i.e. "subtitles/closed
captions", located at the bottom-right of given movie).
Unfortunately, the results of his breakthrough research
to-date illustrate how perfectly the today's situation
with truth, knowledge and monopolistic "official atheistic
science" is reflected in the life wisdom of the Bible verses
from Matthew 13:57, Luke 4:24 and John 4:44, as
well as in the folk wisdom contained in the saying
"truth hurts".
After all, e.g. in New Zealand until today almost
no-one wants to know about the existence and
outcomes of his research. In turn, e.g. in Poland,
in order to invalidate, deny, silence, and combat his
discoveries, inventions and formal proofs, many compatriots
conspire into gangs that act as monopolies distorting
the truth and forgetting about God (as, for example,
it is documented from #A5 to #A5bc from the web page named
totalizm.htm),
while trying to leave for future generations only lies,
rubbish, polluted water, air and soil, and devastated nature.
It is also worth knowing that the
print size of this web page as well as many of the author's other
web pages, can be increased up to about 300%.
This in turn allows it to be read easily without the use of glasses.
This is because every software used to display it has a built-in so-called
"zoom". For example, in "Google Chrome" this "zoom" is revealed
by clicking on the vertical "three-dot" in the upper right corner of the screen,
then the print can be increased or decreased by clicking on the plus or minus
of this "zoom". "Firefox" reveals the same "zoom" by clicking there on a
three-line dash, while "Internet Explorer" reveals by clicking a "cog" over
there. Photos of this and other web pages
of the author can also be enlarged up to 500% of their original size -
which allows e.g. to carefully examine the face of someone who interests
us. The easiest way to enlarge a photo in such a way is to first click on it -
so that it appears in a separate window. Then one should (also by clicking)
show it to oneself from this separate window on the computer screen. In
turn having it on the computer screen, one can open for it the "zoom" which
I described above for enlarging the print size of this web page, then by
clicking on the + or - of this zoom, one can freely increase or decrease
this photograph on the screen.
Part #A:
What I am dreaming about:
Have you ever asked yourself the kinds of questions that hardly anyone
has the courage to ask in public? For example the question, whether in
the optimistic statements of politicians is more truth than in their pre-election
promises? Or the question, whether the avoiding like a plague of the statement
"our country urgently needs the profound social, economic and political reforms"
is the sign that in fact such reforms are still NOT needed in our country?
Or, where leads to, and how finishes, the social, economic and political
trend which we now see in our country? Or whether really the official science
promotes truth when it teaches us in schools that every problem has only
one correct solution, and that the criterion for finding this solution should
be the human greed which requires us to choose the solution which brings
the greatest financial profit? Or, if a leading country stubbornly prints
money, then what is going to happen with this country and with the rest
of world, when the unavoidable financial crash finally arrives (as warns
item #G2)? Or, if in the previous year, two new countries exploded into
violence and anarchy, while in this year four new countries already have
experienced the same fate, does this mean that if this trend continues,
then by 2020 in all countries of the world will be a situation similar to that
which today prevails in countries such as Ukraine or Syria? Or the question,
whether the current political, social, economic and financial trends can change
for the better just by themselves, without us carrying out the required
reforms? Or the question, whether all these scientists, who in numerous
research papers and articles (of the kind listed as article [1#H4] in item
#H4 from the web page named
prophecies.htm)
are trying to warn us, that the present humanity rushes straight to a disaster and self-annihilation,
are just alarmists and fearmongers? Or whether all these people who
currently on massive scale are training themselves how to practically
survive in wildness and without food, and who relentlessly search and
view programs and films that teach skills of survival (of the kind of
TV serial "Man Vs. Wild"), are doing this because their intuition and
experience are telling them that soon the skill of survival in a wilderness
is to decide about life or death, or because they are just bored and
wish to experience a bit of unusual life? Or the question, whether these
are just idle talks all these Biblical warnings and old prophecies of
the kind described in items #H1 to #H3 from the web page named
prophecies.htm
(e.g. the old Polish prophecy stating that "the humanity is to bring
upon itself such a disaster and depopulation, that men will kiss the
ground when they see footsteps of another person")? Or the question,
whether, after all the countries of the world are already engulfed in
riots, violence and anarchy, is there any chance, that our neighbours,
dear ones, and ourselves, to whom naturally we wish the best, are
able to find an access to sufficient source of food and sufficient mental
strength, to survive until the time when the world calms down again?
Etc., etc.
Relatively recently a new philosophy named
"totalizm"
was created, which in turn gave birth to a new science named
the "totaliztic science" (see item #C1 to #C6 from the web page
telekinetics.htm).
They have the courage to openly provide answers to the above
questions. Also they offer simple and effective solutions for
problems caused by the errors of official human science.
After all, to the range of most vital truths to which they
bring our attention, belongs also the fact that every
problem can be solved on a number of ways that differ amongst themselves
by the level of fulfilment of the criteria of morality, and
the fact that amongst all known to us
ways of solving any problem, the most of long-term benefits and the least
of undesirable "side effects" are brought by the solution which most
steeply climbs uphill in the so-called "moral field" (i.e. are brought by the
solution which is the "most moral"), while all immoral solutions
never truly solve human problems, but only escalate these problems
and postpone to a later date the need to solve them in a morally
correct manner (see explanations from item #J1, "Fig. #I1" and an
example from item #N4 of this web page). So what stops us from causing
that we start to promote these simple truths, and that we stop
increasing the human greed with the vision of supposedly only one
correct solution which is based on financial benefits? After all, this
would stop the escalation of troubles which currently we see around
ourselves and which really threaten with the complete disintegration
of our current civilisation and with the turning of Earth into a desert
land.
In view of the most likely answers to questions such as these above, each
one of us has two choices. Namely, either (1) will continue his or her sitting
on own hands and waiting until somewhere around 2040, the situation
probably already repairs by itself - firstly killed, and then revived as new,
by laws of nature and by psychology of crowds. Or (2), he or she decides
to try to make own contribution towards a democratic, peaceful and moral
remedying the incoming problems, through the contribution of own
knowledge and energy into the action. I chose the second option and
urge you, the reader, that you do the same. After all, reading this web
page may provide you with an inspiration and various ideas as how
this should be started. For example, if you live in a country other than
New Zealand, then perhaps some of ideas presented on this web
page still can be adapted to the situation of your own country. In turn,
if you live in New Zealand and in the electorate named "Hutt South"
(see the list of towns of this electorate provided in item #C1 below), then
your contribution to the action will be very simple. Just it is enough, that
in the incoming elections to parliament of 2014 you cast your vote for the
author of this web page - if possible, together with your entire family and
all your friends. However, if you live in New Zealand, but in a different area
than the Hutt South electorate, then you may follow the example of the
author, and also stand for election in 2014, and even better, together with
the author of this web page try to quickly organize a political party based on the
philosophy of totalizm,
so that under its banners it is to come easier to win this election together.
After all, in New Zealand it is enough to unite only 500 members-organisers,
to register a new political party. Thus, if e.g. a single reader was able to
find amongst own family, colleagues from school, friends, and workmates,
let's say 50 such new members, who would support his or her election
to parliament, then a cooperation of only around 10 such readers would
suffice to establish a new party. However, even if there turns to be NO
enough time and energy to organize such a party, still it is enough time
to start gathering the required political experience by standing in these
elections. (Those readers who stand to election while sympathizing with
the philosophy of totalizm and sincerely believing, like the author of this
web page, that totalizm knows all the answers urgently required, may
save on preparation of own election programme, and may simply recommend
this web page to voters, explaining only which ones, out of the moves and solutions
described here, do NOT relate to the situation in their area or country.)
The election to parliament will be held in New Zealand
on Saturday, September 20, 2014. (Note,
that because the name of the country New Zealand
is used on this web page very often, in many places
it is replaced by the abbreviation NZ.) So to utilise
blessings of the democratic process that prevails in
this my adopted homeland, I (means Dr Jan Pająk -
see "part #F" of this web page in which I summarised
my life) took the abovementioned decision that through
subjecting to voting my candidacy for a member of NZ
parliament, I will offer my knowledge, life experience,
and my skills to use totaliztic methods for decision-making
and for solving human problems, towards working for
the good of all inhabitants of this milk and honey flowing
country. After all, already now I meet all the criteria
required to be approved for these elections as a
so-called "independent" candidate - i.e. the candidate,
which does NOT represent any political party. I also decided,
that with my candidacy I will stand in the electorate named
"Hutt South" (to which, in addition to the township of
Petone
with around 6-thousand inhabitants, in which I live,
belong also numerous other townships listed in
item #C1 below on this web page - together inhabited
by around 42 thousands of voters).
I prepared this web page so that all persons registered
as voters in that electorate "Hutt South", could consider
voting for my candidacy. After all, "Fig #A1" of this web
page summarizes, while item #D1 explains in details,
the main goals, reforms, and actions that I would try
to implement in case I was elected to NZ parliament.
So if the reader is registered as a voter in the electorate
"Hutt South", and he or she finds convincing whatever
I presented in "Fig. #A1" and in item #D1, then I would
be grateful if the reader votes for me. On election ballot
papers my name will be written as follows:
Pajak, Jan
Independent
(Notice that the voting for me, still would leave you with another
"party vote", which you could give to any party that you would
like to support.) I suspect, that in spite the preparations for 2014
elections seem to be foretelling a complete transformation of
the political landscape of New Zealand, still on the "Hutt South"
election ballot papers I will probably be the only
"independent" candidate. This is a bit pity, because
according to my understanding, New Zealand urgently
needs in parliament independent candidates with
my level of education, knowledge,
life experience, creative mind, and unconventional
way of thinking - that means needs candidates with
characteristics that were shaped in people by fates
described in more details in "part #F" from this web page.
Progress in my preparations for these elections, and their
final results, I intend to regularly report to the readers on
this my informational web page - e.g. see item #M2 near
the end of it. Thus, the reading of
this web page probably will prove to be fascinating also
for persons that are NOT connected with election described
here.
After all, for example, the situation in which I am,
already decided for me, that my "election campaign"
is to be highly untypical and practically constitute
a kind of precedent for modern times - that means, it must be a
"zero-dollar"
campaign. This means, that for the campaign itself
I will try to NOT spend even a single dollar (ignoring
the inevitable initial cost of registration and legal formalities).
Such a "restrain" in my campaign stems mainly from
the fact, that for a required spending I cannot afford,
while simultaneously I do NOT have wealthy sponsors
who would finance my campaign. So, if for example,
a "miracle" is to
occur, and with the help of God I actually become
elected, then this is to mean that voters appreciated
my potential, achievements and the program of reforms
which I propose, not just appreciated the "money talking".
This information web page (which I prepared myself,
and thus totally for free) is a harbinger of the approach
of this "zero-dollar" election campaign. It is also a kind
of progress report explaining to the reader the advancement
of my preparations for these elections, subsequent goals
and intentions which I set for myself, new experiences
and knowledge which my actions in the matter of elections
have provided, etc. This web page is NOT yet my official
web page of the election campaign - because the official
web page for this campaign I can create only about 26
August 2014, when it becomes officially known whether
the electoral commission definitively approves me for a
candidate to this election - as this is explained in
item #M2 from this web page.
Unfortunately, from 26 August 2014, when according to
the schedule of elections, the approvals of candidates
will be definitively ended, until the date of the elections
on 20 September 2014, is to remain only around 3 weeks
of time. So in spite that I am going then to formulate quickly
and to publish my official web page of electoral campaign,
and formally initiate my electoral campaign, still too little
time is to remain for me to be able to actually implement
my campaign and let to know to all potential voters about
my existence and about goals and intentions which I would
try to pursue in the case if I am elected. On the other hand,
elections to parliament always have very strong and widely-known
candidates, out of which some have already "eaten their
teeth" on winning subsequent elections, which have in
their disposal the required funds and plans for their
election campaigns that are to reach to all voters,
which are supported by the widely known political
parties, and for which the existing election laws
seem to give an additional advantage over the
"independent" candidates - for an example see the
caption under "Fig. #J1". Thus, for the "independent"
novice like me, it seems to be virtually impossible
to win the election - if I start to inform voters about
my existence, goals and intentions only after
26 August 2014. Therefore, already since 25 March
2014, means almost since I made the decision to
stand for this election, I keep openned this informational
web page for viewing by all the interested people.
A note to readers from countries
other than New Zealand - for example, from Poland. Although
elections to the parliament in New Zealand may seem irrelevant to
the inhabitants of other countries, in fact in today's world everything
is so interrelated, that whatever happens in one country, it also
transforms the situation and life of people from other countries.
After all, the internet and modern communication, cause that examples
of actions, ideas, and inspiration flow fast from a country to a country.
In turn God so created us, that the voice of our conscience, or the innate
desire to even with others, do NOT allow us to remain indifferent to
either the suffering of a neighbour, nor to the type of someone's actions
that led him or her to a success. In addition to all this, I am also the creator of the
philosophy of totalizm -
the number of followers of which is constantly growing, both in Poland
and in other countries (the main principle of this philosophy is explained
in items #J1 and #J2 of this web page). So I hope, that some of these supporters
will repeatedly pray for the success of my goals and intentions. After all,
even atheists and people stubbornly ignoring my
formal scientific proof for the existence of God
are repeatedly reassured (although they deliberately ignore later this
truth) that in fact "prayers make miracles". So it is really worth that you,
the reader, actively engage yourself in tracking and supporting my actions -
which this web page describes. Even if it will NOT become for you clear
and visible, still whatever I am describing here at some stage will also
irrevocably influence your own fate.
Fig. #A1. Here is the electoral flyer (poster) designed
voluntarily by one of the readers of this web page. (Its
improved, 2 pages long version shows "Fig. #M1".)
The flyer summarizes briefly most important information
about my 2014 electoral campaign. Thus, amongst
others, it briefly summarizes the described in items
#D1 of this web page most vital goals of my election
campaign - the achieving of which in case of electing
me for an MP I would like to devote everything in my
power. It gives also the internet address of the web
page that describes my campaign, and my email address.
For the benefit of these voters and readers who impose
stringent moral requirements onto those persons who
are to represent them in the parliament, this flyer has
been stamped with the symbol of morality and
obedience of moral requirements, means with the
logo of totalizm -
i.e. the logo of most moral, modern, human-formulated
philosophy on Earth, which philosophy, amongst others,
uses scientific methods, empirical evidence and logical
deductions to confirms and justify the truth of
statements of the Bible,
to translate explanations from the Bible into modern
scientific and everyday language, and to extend our
access to methods and tools that allow us to fulfil
better requirements contained in the Bible (for
details see the caption under "Fig. #J1ab" below on
this web page). The above flyer (poster) was prepared
in the safe "jpg" format designed for photographs, and
it is NOT blocked from being copied.
Exactly 9,999 copies of the above version of the flyer
size A5, after being printed in Germany, were posted
to me in New Zealand. This is the number which I consider
sufficient for my election campaign. Thus, the above
version of the flyer will NEVER be printed again. Starting
from 17 June 2014, almost everyday I continue the task
of personal delivery of these flyers directly to hands of
voters from households in the Hutt South electorate. I
am describing my delivery in item #N4 of this web page.
(If, instead of getting it
into own hands, a voter from the Hutt South electorate
finds this flyer in his/her mailbox, the reason is
that either he/she is NOT present in the house
when I knock to the door, or something prevents him/her
from receiving this flyer in person when I stand by
the door of his/her house to introduce myself, to talk
to him/her in person and to shake his/her hand.)
This flyer already has an interesting history - see
introduction to item #N4. Thus, for those who
received it, I would recommend to keep it, as
over time it may become a kind of "collectors'
item". In order to increase additionally its
collectable value, I decided to place my personal
(hand written) signature on 50 flyers that I
gave away - for details see the caption under
"Table #C1". The uniqueness of this flyer depends
on the fact, that it is printed NOT on an organic
paper produced at the expense of our trees, but
especially superbly and qualitatively on a flexible,
"bio-degradable" paper which does NOT contain
cellulose (thus which does NOT destroy trees)
covered with a ceramic layer - as it is described
in (2014/5/28) from item #M2 below on this web page.
Hence, this flyer represents the quality of the printed
medium (i.e. flexible and "bio-degradable" ceramic leaf),
and a technology of printing, that yet are NOT available
in New Zealand and are likely to remain unavailable for
some years to come. Furthermore, this flyer represents
also the outcome of the first miracle which I described
in the beginning of item #N4 below, NOT mentioning
the fact that only one flyer in statistically every around
200 given away to voters contains a personal signature
of the creator of totalizm.
#A1.
What kind of New Zealand I dream about:
If someone asked about my dreams for the country,
which for me since 1982 has become a second home,
my dream is that New Zealand has combined all the
good that the future is to bring to the humanity, with
everything best that New Zealanders carry out from
their past. And so, regarding the future I dream
that New Zealand has become a super-modern and
highly prosperous country, to which its resources and
capabilities qualify it, and in which people benefit from
the latest technical equipment and scientific achievements
to improve the quality of their lives and to effectively care
for nature and the environment. In turn,
as for the past, I dream
that New Zealand again became this "paradise on earth",
means become a moral, beautiful and natural country
which I remember it, that it was right after my emigration
from Poland in 1982. I mean, I dream that
again the streets of New Zealand re-populate with happy,
well-maintained, prosperous people who are always
smiling, helpful, accommodating, objective, moral,
and just. My dream is also that New Zealanders again
could safely leave wide-open doors of their homes,
even when inhabitants are NOT at home. I dream that
NZ has become a country where women are NOT afraid
to exercise alone in parks even after midnight, because
they know that nothing threatens them in there, and the
only thing that can happen to them is to receive smiles
and greetings from other passers-by - that means has
become the country as safe and moral as now is the
South Korea,
in which in 2007 I saw just how many single women exercised
in city parks well after midnight. I dream that it again is
a country where the water is crystal clear, the air smelling
fresh, while the nature is undefiled - as if people and
their droppings do it NOT exist in it. To become a country
in which all people live in healthy, dry, full of light houses
with an affordable for everyone price. To come back to
the situation in 1982, when the education and health-care
were for free, and thus that everyone who has a desire,
abilities and needs could get in the education that suits
him or her. That again it becomes a country in which every
citizen who wants to work has a job and a decent livelihood
that meets his or her basic needs. That again it becomes a country
which in the evenings and even at night, have the streets full
of lights, open cafes, tables on the sidewalks, and the crowds
of strolling holidaymakers and locals who enjoy the life after
productive and professional satisfaction filled days of work.
#A2.
How the reality of today's New Zealand really looks like -
means a review of examples of situations the remedy
of which urgently calls for reforms:
However, it does NOT take to look far to discover,
that the reality of today's New Zealand increasingly
fast distant itself from my dreams about this country
described above, in spite that these dreams are
realistic and accomplishable, because they existed
already in this country as recently as 1982.
It is enough to look at newspapers to discover
in them articles of the kind [1#A2] published
under the title "Global survey shows one in six
Kiwis struggling for food", from pages A18-9 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Friday, March 21, 2014) -
which article reveals that in spite New Zealand
is one of the largest producers and exporters
of food in the world, at the same time it is also
the ninth worst out of developed countries in
which the population cannot afford to buy the
amount of food they need. (I.e., that NZ is the
9th worst out of developed countries, a large
proportion of the population of which is simply
starving.) It is also enough to see old, wet,
full of moulding, plastered with deadly asbestos,
apartments and houses which are home to
a significant proportion of New Zealanders.
(May shock us also the number of homeless
people currently existing in New Zealand.)
Or see how empty and dark at nights are NOT
only the parks, but even sidewalks in most of
cities of the country - could this mean, that after
the nightfall, people now simply are afraid to
leave the safety of their homes or cars? Or learn
statistics how big is already, and how quickly
is growing, the gap between rich and normal
New Zealanders. Or try to get to know still kept
secret statistics on avalanche of suicides which
troubles the country - see the article [2#A2]
entitled "Ease rules on reporting suicide,
commission says", from page A2 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 2, 2014).
Or check when for the last time someone in
NZ, e.g. any amongst its numerous monopolies,
has implemented any commonly seek political
or economic reform that would actually improve
(rather than hinder) the quality of life of the
inhabitants of the country. Etc., etc. - such a
review can be extended almost indefinitely.
One does NOT need any unique abilities to deduce,
that since both, the resources of New Zealand,
as well as its population, nearly have NOT
changed since 1982, while the production
and export of the country considerably increased
in the meantime, but the quality of life of citizens
in the same period of time fell sharply by such
a large value, the blame for this must bear
decision makers who avoid the introduction
of reforms that are required. So these decision-makers
either do NOT apply appropriate criteria for the
assessment of the situation and the consequences
of their decisions, which would tell them of "what"
and "why" is to be reformed - as this is indicated
in item #I1 from this web page, or they simply
decide that the introduction of reforms about
which they know that are required, is too risky
because in the country there will always be
a number of influential people, whom these
reforms will NOT please. It is also easy to
deduce, that if in the end there appears someone,
who will introduce reforms most urgently
required, then the quality of life for all
inhabitants of the country will again begin
to improve. Notice that I use here of the
word "all" people, because it is NOT
difficult to notice, that among the materially
well-standing citizens of the country seems
to dominate the opinion that supposedly
does NOT matter what is the situation of
rest of the population, if only they themselves
can afford whatever they want to have.
However, the truth is that when the lack
of reforms causes the fall of situation in
the country, then the standard of living
of practically every citizen decreases very
rapidly. For example, even the wealthiest
cease then to be safe in their own homes,
nor they can in the evening leave the safety
of their cars at any location they would
be willing to stop. As also the recent events
from the South Africa illustrated this to us,
when in the country morality and rules of
law are collapsing, then even these most
famous and rich risk their lives when they
just go at night to toilet in their own home -
where still can kill them someone amongst
people closest to them. Also, for example,
when the country is poor, then even the
wealthiest are protected by almost nothing
in a hospital against a mismatched transfusion
of blood infected with a deadly disease,
which blood was given by an ill donor,
nor anything protects them against eating
cancer-causing food ingredients, which
food their greedy colleagues inadvertently
packed with the same chemicals that they
use for soil or products earmarked for the
poor. Etc., etc. What I want to point here
to the reader, is that the really high standard
of living can be enjoyed only in a country
where "all" inhabitants have satisfied their
basic needs. (However, please DO NOT
confuse here the "needs" with the "whims" -
for example, having a healthy and comfortable
flat is the "need", in turn having a villa is
already a "whim".) In other words, in the
vital interest of virtually every New Zealander
is to vote in the upcoming elections either
for Dr Jan Pajak, or for someone who is serious
about making the necessary reforms, and
do NOT treat reforms only as a pre-election
advertising that is to be forgotten immediately
after winning the election.
#A2.1.
Notice, however, that in order to become clear, every review must be
presented in an unbalanced manner and ignore all kinds of different
shades of whatever was discussed:
Motto:
"I may disagree with whatever you say and in whatever you believe,
and I may spend my life to fight against it with all means available
to me, but at the same time I will do everything in my power so that
you have the right to express your opinions and beliefs in a public
manner without experiencing from this reason any harassment or
externally imposed unpleasantness."
Human perception works in such a way, that
in order anything is to be clearly understood,
the argumentation of it must focus on only one
aspect, or on one topic. This is because people
are able to process at any given time only one
topic or one problem. So every effectively working
overview that someone carries out on any topic,
must be one-sided, and thus non-objective.
It is impossible to concentrate only on one
aspect or one theme, and at the same time
be objective. After all, our reality consists of a long
range of various shades, while if all of them
were discussed in a single overview, then
the overview would be too confusing, and
thus incomprehensible. I am explaining this
because in previous item #A2 of this web
page I focused on presenting those aspects
of life in NZ, which already require urgent
political, economic, or social reforms.
If I do NOT reveal these aspects, then my
claims on which I am going to build my
electoral campaign, namely that New Zealand
urgently needs reforms, would NOT have
obtained a justification and would NOT
have the evidential foundation.
But God is a great "balancer". The world that He
created and very wisely manages God always
balances so perfectly, that every negative is
balanced in this world by a different positive.
This divine balancing exists and operates also
in New Zealand - as evidenced by the fact that
in spite of the facts that I mentioned in item
#A2 above, I still live in New Zealand, and NOT
for example in Australia or America. Examples
of positives which in NZ balance some negatives
indicated above in item #A2, include, amongst
others, that in NZ there is still a democracy and
that people like myself can stand in elections -
which e.g. cannot be said for many other countries
of the world, or for example, the fact that in NZ
I can freely publish a website which reveals the
truth - i.e. a website such as this one, what I
would NOT be able to do in a shockingly large
number of countries in the world without
experiencing later some forms of persecution
and externally caused troubles.
Stating the above about balancing of all matters
by God, I must simultaneously add, that the existence
of this balancing does NOT absolve us from the
obligation to remove the negatives that hinder
our lives - that is in the case of issues discussed
on this web page, from the implementation in NZ
of reforms that would rectify, amongst others,
situations described in item #A2 above. After all,
without removing these negatives, the life of "all"
of us would become progressively more miserable,
while the country in which we live would turn into
a kind of hell - which situation can already be seen
in various countries inhabitants of which neglected
to democracy and reforms. In other words, we "all"
shall benefit in the form of improving the quality of
our lives - if we support initiatives such as those
described on this web page. These benefits may occur
even in countries other than NZ, as good examples
quickly spread. This means, that supporting my
standing to election in NZ and goals that I set
for myself and that I am describing on this web
page, makes sense and is worth a positive endorsement
by every person - even by those who do NOT agree
with the political goals that I present here. So it
should not surprise anyone the motto of this item -
which is also one of the principles of my life, namely
that "I may disagree with
whatever you say and in whatever you believe, and
I may spend my life to fight against it with all means
available to me, but at the same time I will do everything
in my power so that you have the right to express
your opinions and beliefs in a public manner without
experiencing from this reason any harassment or
externally imposed unpleasantness".
#A3.
New Zealand urgently needs deep social,
economic and political reforms - but its politicians
are behaving as if they cannot see this need:
Fairies are NOT going to introduce for people
reforms urgently needed in New Zealand.
Someone amongst politicians have to weigh
to begin to talk openly about the need for them,
and must begin to make real efforts to get them
introduced in life. For example, someone has
to finally have the courage to publicly set to
himself the aim of stifling the spiral of quickly
rising costs of living. Someone must also take
the goal of eliminating bureaucracy and greed
that caused many people in NZ to be unable to
afford to pay for the electricity they need, which
New Zealand produces almost for free in numerous
hydro-power plants built more than half a century
ago - e.g. see the article [1#A3] "Power
bills rise $63 for the year", from page A3 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Monday, March 31, 2014). Someone
must also remove monopolies that drive up prices
of everything, and that paralyze growth of productivity.
Etc., etc. So far, however, such a person has NOT yet
appeared in the arena of New Zealand politics.
Fortunately, the upcoming elections seem to promise
that the political landscape of NZ will be transformed
by them. After all, to vote comes a new generation that
already disapproves the "sitting on hands" and avoiding
acting. Also new political parties with fairly radical
programs are created. In this situation, there is also
a hope that voters of the "Hutt South" will vote for an
"independent" with the program of reforms that this
web page describes.
#A4.
By my candidacy in the 2014 elections to the NZ parliament
I would like to make a contribution to the implementation
of at least a part of reforms so urgently needed in New Zealand:
Reforms NOT always can be implemented.
After all, their implementation depends on
many factors. For example, someone must
have the courage to come forward with the
idea of introducing them. He must also have
the power and resilience to resist the opposition
with which his efforts are to meet. Furthermore,
he must also find many other allies operating
together in harmony and discipline - because
only "in the unity is strength". NOT all people
have similar intentions and wishes. Nevertheless,
it is always worth that someone tried implementing
them. If we do NOT attempt a quick implementation,
the country in which we live may begin to be shaken
by events which consequences unpleasant for all of
us will later be impossible to prevent. I went through
the hard school of life - which is explained in more
detail in "part #F" of this web page. I suspect that
this "pleasure" is awaiting for me. After all, only
when one tries, one can then go ahead and look in
the mirror knowing that did everything in own
power. And if by a chance, with the precious help
of God, can be realized even a part of any reform,
then it can also be told to ourselves in the mirror,
that our life was NOT in vain. After all, then we can
leave behind a world which is much better than the
one in which we started our lives.
#A4.
In fact, the reforms and actions which I am taking
resemble almost a "tackling the Moon with a hoe" -
but with the simultaneous help from God, a miracle,
time, and with a superhuman effort supported by
a very wise action, these may lead to ending with a success:
Motto:
"In whatever I do, I never fight with people,
but only with morally deficient ideas or activities
on which these people insist."
I am a scientist and a realist. I am well aware
that reforms and actions to which I am referring
on this web page and to implementing of which
I am preparing myself, in fact are almost a
"tackling the Moon with a hoe". After all, to
have some chances for a success in these
reforms, I first would have to win the elections.
Meanwhile, I can only stand in the constituency
in which I live (i.e. in the "Hutt South") - because
only its problems I know well enough and hence
I can use my efforts to solve these problems for
gaining traction in my campaign. (Especially
strong resonance among voters of electorate
"Hutt South" has "the problem of the stadium" -
which is described more comprehensively in
"part #I" of this web page - especially in item
#I5) Meanwhile, the constituency "Hutt South"
since long time is a "fortress" of "Labour Party".
Local people for
generations automatically and without hesitation
voted for candidates who are indicated for them
by this party. But I do NOT belong neither to this,
nor to any other, political party. In addition, the
electorate has a very good member of parliament,
whom I admire very much and to whom I feel a
huge respect, who "ate his teeth" on politics,
and whom all here know and vote repeatedly
for him. Can someone like me have any chance
with him? I believe that YES. After all, in Poland
we have the proverb "only
a new broom sweeps fine". (The
English equivalent of this proverb says it differently,
i.e. "a new broom sweeps well".) But the current
Member of Parliament (MP) can already be
categorised as a proverbial "old broom" -
the effectiveness of "sweeping" of which
voters seem to doubt. This doubt is perfectly
confirmed by the empirical facts - for example,
by the apathy of voters that is described in
(2014/3/22) from item #M2 of this web page.
So in order to win this
(or next) election, I need to let somehow know
to the most of voters about my existence, goals
and intentions, and then convincingly prove
to them that I have the power and the clout,
in the presence of which in other candidates
the voters already have doubted.
As a scientist and a person experienced in
carrying research, I believe that with the
elapse of time I will find a way to prove this.
Only that so-far I cannot estimate how much
time I need for this - so whether I manage
to achieve this before the current election.
To make elections even more interesting, party
candidates standing here for elections will have
a dedicated to them by their parties the sums of
around $25,000 allowed by the electoral law, to
conduct election campaigns. However, I do NOT
have a penny that I could devote for this purpose.
I also do NOT have wealthy sponsors who would
cover at least a part of the necessary expenses.
Anyway, on this the obstacles that block my efforts do
NOT end. After all, I am to campaign in the language
that is NOT my native, thus from learning details
of which I am still far away - and we must remember
that the ability to express oneself (and truths)
"diplomatically" would be an important point of
one's advantage. So far I can also be accused
that I lack the experience in New Zealand politics -
after all, most of my experience in this area is
derived from Poland. In addition, I chronically
lack of time - I am, after all, a scientist who most
of time spends on researching and publishing,
while these need to be intensifying and reclassified
into social knowledge, if I am going to win the election.
One of the important factors that significantly
impedes my actions, is the "principle of
assessing and promoting (or combating) ideas,
NOT people" dictated to us by the
philosophy of totalizm.
According to this principle, in
everything that we do we have an obligation to focus
on evaluating the ideas and actions (and NOT the
people), whether these meet the criteria of morality,
and then we have a duty to promote or combat these
ideas or actions, NOT directing our covenants
or attacks on people who insist on them.
The compliance with this principle introduces a
number of impediments to what I intend to do.
For example, to combat only the ideas, NOT people,
almost necessary becomes to deliberately avoid the
use of names in whatever one writes or does. This
in turn in the politically uninformed observers or
voters may cause confusion and difficulty in
understanding what is actually combated.
After all, people are accustomed to pointing
the finger and to combating other people, NOT
ideas. Combating ideas, NOT people, also
requires the use of particularly polite and
impersonally addressed wording - which
for me is a hugely difficult task, given that
English is NOT my native language. Combating
ideas requires also reminding of this fact
to people with whose ideas we fight. This in
turn imposes a requirement of personal visits
to authors of the targeted ideas - i.e. visits
similar to that one which I described in
(2014/3/26) from item #M2 below on this
web page, when I tried to visit the current
Member of Parliament, to introduce myself,
to pass to him my regards, to inform
him as the first person, that I intend to compete
with him in this election, and to remind him
that in case due to
some miracle he lost with me this election,
then for him it will NOT make any difference,
because being high ranking on the list
of activists of his party, he will be adopted
to parliament by his party, even if he loses
the election.
Another important factor that still far outweighs
the balance in favour of previously chosen Member
of Parliament, is a phenomenon unique to New
Zealand, which I call the "syndrome
of participation in a horse racing". Namely,
similarly as in a horse racing people placing bats
on individual horses heed only one aspect of these
races - namely "which horse will win", also a
proportion of voters in NZ is NOT interested
in what the political objectives or the program
of reforms a given candidate for parliament proposes,
but the only thing that absorbs
them is to vote for the candidate who wins.
If the candidate for which they voted wins the election,
then awaits for them a lot of pleasures. For example,
starting from the time when NZ was ruled by a
leader who ruled prior to the one that rules at the time
of writing this web page, the voters who voted for a
candidate which wins the election, receive later a
congratulation letter which is so nice looking that
is suitable to even be framed and hang on the wall.
These voters then can also boast to others that they
voted for the winning candidate. For the sport-oriented
New Zealanders there is a kind of personal satisfaction
which voters feel when they see that "their" candidate
wins. Empirics confirms that the syndrome described
here has a great strength and is governing over a significant
proportion of voters. An example of such confirming are
fates of the "Kiwi" party in elections of 2008 and 2011 -
when this party offered eagerly awaited by New Zealanders
reform of the "anti-smacking law" described in item #B5.1
of the web page named
will.htm -
for the reform of which they voted overwhelmingly in a public
referendum, however, the placing of this reform in the electoral
program of the Kiwi party did NOT gave to it the number
of votes that would count.
#A5.
Luckily my characteristics and situation balances
the obstacles described in item #A4 above:
Fortunately for the people who entrust me and
will be voting for me, God put me through a
school of life, and also has provided me with
personal characteristics, that can balance the
situational disadvantages discussed in item
#A4 above.
And so, in terms of experience in the social and
political area, I gathered them in Poland practically
the entire period of my stay in there. Already in my
high school class 11 (i.e. aged 17) I was an active
instructor for the Board of County ZMW (i.e. the
Rural Youth). Already then I organized sport and
music festivals, dances, public fireworks shows
(which I personally designed and shoot up - in
these times a hysteria about the flare was NOT
nearly as advanced as it is today), camps, conventions,
and training for rural youth. It is at that time of my
life that I even tried to organize my own music band -
which is described in subsection A19 and in caption
for "Fig. A4" from volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
During times of my university studies I worked in the Financial
Commission of the academic board ZSP (Polish Students'
Association), leading the cash assistance and loans
for students and acting in several university canteens
committees (which dealt with quality control of student
meals). I also organized meetings of rural youth from
the Milicz District with foreign students studying at the
Technical University of Wrocław (one of those students
was Mohamed Khalafalla from Sudan, he became a close
friend of mine for the period of study). After graduation
I became involved in the activities of the ORIGINAL version
of the Polish "Solidarity" - because of which involvement
later I was forced to emigrate from Poland. In New Zealand
I ceased to engage in political and social actions for a
number of reasons, for example because I still was healing
the psychological shock of having to emigrate from Poland,
because I did not learned yet enough about the system of democracy
in NZ, etc. But instead I concentrated on scientific research,
which was to serve to many people, for example, such as my
philosophy of totalizm or the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
In turn, in terms of my personal qualities, I have
a highly creative mind, high knowledge and education,
experience in watching and in drawing useful conclusions,
the habit of hard work, experience in overcoming
difficulties that barred my way, a sense of citizen
duty and love to my neighbours, and the certainty
of existence of God who loves justice. In addition,
many people, I hope including also you, the reader,
already pray for the success of my goals and intentions.
Part #B:
I begin and finish every most important my attempt
with a prayer - so if your beliefs and wishes allow
this to you, then please join me now in my prayer
and repeat it with me:
#B1.
The prayer - if you wish to join me in repeating it,
then just suffices that you read it carefully with
the asking and seeking spiritual attitude:
Holy
Father, if this does NOT interfere with Your
superior goals and plans, then I am asking
sincerely to support with Your divine power
the implementation of the compatible with
Your will parts of the goals and intentions
of your servant, Jan Pajak - the author of
this web page.
Amen.
#B2.
If your worldview allows it, I invite also you that after you
have finished reading this web page, then together with
me you also thanked God - just as I do in item #M3 near
the end of this web page:
#B3.
Reading this item (#B3) you can omit - it merely explains
why everything important to me, I start and finish with a
prayer, and why I also recommend to you, the reader, to do the same:
Although this may seem unusual, in my adult life
until 1985 I considered myself to be an "atheist"
and confessed to the so-called "scientific worldview".
However, in 1985 I developed a completely new theory
now disseminated in the world under the name of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
This theory is quite remarkable, because it literally
shows to us everything from a completely opposite
point of view than it is done by any other existing
scientific theory. (This is why it can also be called
the "theory of everything".)
But most importantly, it scientifically proves to us the
existence of God.
As such, for those who accept it, this theory gradually
persuades to transform the whole of their views about
life and about the world around us - that is, to accept the
philosophy of totalizm
to become the practiced everyday philosophy of their
life. It also completely changes the foundation of our
approach to virtually all matters. For example, in
science it commands the approach "a priori" to
research - practically now implemented only by
the new "totaliztic science"
described e.g. in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page
telekinetics.htm.
During decision-making process it commands to
look for directions from the "moral field" described,
amongst others, in item #J1 of this web page. For
disasters it recommends the based on morality
methods of defence described on my web page named
quake.htm.
Etc., etc. But this groundbreaking work of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
introduces also adverse implications for its dissemination.
After all, most people have acquired in their youths
the views and habits that allow them a comfortable
life free from the need to improve themselves - thus
because of such views and habits those people typically
do NOT like to change just when somewhere appears
a new theory which they are NOT forced to learn.
This unwillingness of people to recognize the findings
of new theories most perfectly is expressed by the
adage often repeated at
my alma mater in Poland
(in which I first lectured and conducted research),
i.e. the adage stating that "in
results of experimental research immediately believe
everyone - with the exception of their author, and in
results of theories no-one believes - except for their
author". According to this Polish saying,
I firmly believe in results of my
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
So in my personal life, the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
caused that now I already
know for certain that God does exist.
Knowledge is, as you know, more reliable than just belief.
After all, one can always
stop believing, but one NEVER stops to know -
see the biblical reference [1#F4]. It is because
of the new knowledge that provided to me the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
that from a former atheist with "scientific-views" - for
which I considered myself before the year 1985,
I gradually transformed into the present person
who considers himself a "servant of God" and
who prays fervently before starting any more
significant action while thanks God after this
action is finished.
Part #C:
Most important data regarding the electorate "Hutt South":
#C1.
The size of the electorate "Hutt South" - and thus also
the enormity of just letting to know all these voters about
my existence and my electoral intentions:
Every action on the political or social arena,
including this of mine, is based on the help
of others - that is why I am counting on your
assistance. For me personally a support is
especially needed because of the enormity
of the task, which I try to implement in a way
that it fulfils the demanding criteria of morality,
thus which is simply impossible to achieve alone.
To give here any idea of the magnitude of this
task, the electorate named "Hutt South",
in which I stand to the election, occupies almost
a half of the long mountain valley in which several
dozen of towns and settlements are located -
including about 6-thousand strong township of
Petone,
in which I live. As I managed to discover it only from
the analysis of addresses provided on the list of voters
living in this electorate (because initially no-one seemed
to be able to provide me this information officially), in
2014 to this electorate belong the following towns, which
I listed below in "Table #C1" in the alphabetical order
(note that three towns were changed recently - about
which fact I write in the paragraph below this list):
Table #C1. Here is a list of towns that belong to the electorate "Hutt South". With
each town I provided various data which turned out to be useful in planning and
implementing my intention to personally deliver the election flyers directly to hands
of voters (i.e. the flyers shown in "Fig. #A1"). The most of data originate from census
of 2013 - which I found on the web page
www.stats.govt.nz.
In turn the data which were missing in there, I complemented from a number of other web pages.
Notice that I started my delivery of flyers on 17
June 2014, and that each day I was able to deliver
around 100 flyers - as I explained this in item #N4
below. The 5000th flyer I delivered on 27th July 2014 -
somewhere along the main street from the western
part of the township Wainuiomata. The 7000th flyer
I delivered on 17th August somewhere in the Eastern
part of Petone. The 8000th flyer I delivered on 29th
August somewhere in the Eastern part of Waterloo.
The 9000th flyer I delivered afternoon on Monday,
8th September 2014, somewhere in the South-East
part of Fairfield. The last, 9995th flyer designated for
voters I delivered on the main street of Woburn around
3 pm on Sunday, 14th September 2014. (Four flyers
from the received total number of 9999 I designated
for a non-election use.)
Somehow it so happens, that already by now the
philosophy of totalizm
has become a kind of phenomenon on the world's
scale. Also, with the elapse of time probably the
uniqueness of this philosophy will even increase.
Simultaneously, so far NO object was ever created
for followers of totalizm, which they could laboriously
acquire and then keep in their collection for the future
generations. Thus, I decided to declare the printed
version of the flyer from "Fig. #A1" to be such a
collectors' item. After all, I am giving this flyer
for free (i.e. in accordance with principles of totalizm),
it already become an object of one miracle described
at the beginning of item #N4, it is printed in the superb
technical quality, it was printed only once and in
a limited number, the flexible ceramic leafs on which
it is printed have attributes the authenticity of which
can easily be checked in the future, and in addition
50 flyers that I gave away contain near their end a
blue personal (hand written) signature of the creator
of totalizm - which fact means that statistically
only one such signed flyer is given away to
voters with each around 200 unsigned flyers.
On 19 April 2014 I read, however, in the newspaper
article [2#M2] described in (2014/4/19) from item
#M2 below on this web page, that the workers'
township "Naenae" from which a few days earlier
I started my election campaign, was excluded from
the electorate "Hutt South". Instead it, to this
electorate were added two rather exclusive suburbs
of Wellington, named "Korokoro" and "Maungaraki" -
about which is almost certain, that their predominantly
wealthy residents will NOT see a need for carrying
out any reforms in NZ.
In 2013 the "Hutt South" had registered 42,139 voters scattered
around these towns. Data for the year 2014 are NOT in my disposal,
but it can be expected that they will be similar. Such a large number
of voters means unenforceability of my campaign pursued by only
one person. After all, if e.g. such a campaign I would carry out
through personal talks with voters, then to each one of these
voters I would have to devote at least 30 minutes (which is the
absolute minimum understanding that in order to change the
talker, in a significant proportion of cases I would need to move
to another house or apartment, and from time to time also change
the street or even to drive to another town). So by carrying out
the campaign every day continuously for 24 hours, chats with
all those voters still would take me about two and a half of years.
-->
In a democracy, politicians act "for the people
and with the nation" (at least in theory). Hence
it is NOT possible to win the election nor later
introduce significant reforms, without the
assistance and cooperation of other people
and other politicians. Therefore, I greatly
count on help of everyone to whom are
close ideas and reforms that I have proposed
on this web page. If you can NOT afford to
help me in any way described below, then
I would be grateful though for at least writing
to me to share your opinions - as encourages
you item #R6 near the end of this web page.
Write to me, for example, what do you think
about reforms that I propose here, or what
other reforms you think are important and
should be examined.
#C2.
I do NOT look for a financial assistance - but you
can support my actions on many different ways:
Motto:
"If something is worth doing, it is also worth to do it well."
In the election described on this web page
(those of 2014), I prepared myself mentally
that I will have to carry out a "zero-dollar"
campaign. So I do NOT look for any sponsors
and financial grants. But if my goals and
intentions are close to your beliefs and
you would like to somehow support them,
then you do NOT have to be afraid that
I expect from you any financial donations,
but you can help me in various other ways
described in this item - no matter
in which country you live.
Ways on which you can help me depend on devoting
some services to my efforts, which are worth a
certain sum, but which will NOT be associated
with sending me any money or subsidizing my
campaign. For example, if you have the ability
to print, you can print for me campaign's posters
that we together will design (inspiring people who
are to read them to familiarize themselves with the
reforms I would like to achieve - which in turn
could persuade many of them to vote for my
candidacy). If you own a web server, you can
devote for my campaign a free space on the
disk to upload in there e.g. this web page and
web pages related to it. If you have a few extra
dollars you can buy for me an "Internet domain
name" with an easy to remember name, which
then I would use for purposes of campaign, for
example, a domain named pajak.nz - but
if this is already taken, then the ending "nz" you
can replace with any other (e.g. "jp"). If you are
a programmer, then you can program for me a
system of online communication with my voters.
If you live in New
Zealand's towns that belong to my electorate
"Hutt South", i.e. you live in one of the towns
that I mentioned above in item #C1, and if
you are registered as a voter in there, then
you can browse my goals and intentions
listed in item #D1 below on this web page, and
illustrated in "Fig #A1". Perhaps these fit
well enough with your own views to
decide to vote for me. After all,
the main reason to NOT receive the
votes from those voters on whose votes I could
count, is that because of my limited capabilities,
to these voters do NOT reach the information
about my existence and about reforms that I
would like implement! Etc., etc.
At this point I should also add that the New Zealand
electoral law bans
the use of other people in the conduct of agitation
for someone's election campaign. This prohibition
is quite a big hurdle for the candidates, because it
takes away the possibility of benefiting from the
fact that New Zealand is a country in which there
are only
2 degrees of separation
(relationship link) between people, and thus in which
it is extremely easy to convey the required information
to someone from the selected electorate. After all, in
such a 2-degree society, virtually every citizen of New Zealand
knows someone who already lives in the Hutt South electorate -
which is NOT the case in, for example, 5-degree China,
where everyone would know someone who would know
someone who would know someone, etc., and only the
fifth person in that chain would live in the required
electorate. After all, if such a ban was NOT introduced,
then it would be sufficient that, for example, the reader
of this web page, who does NOT live in my electorate,
but who knows some voters from Petone or from Lower
Hutt, would have let to know his friends about my
existence, and would point to them the address
www.pajak.org.nz.
At that address is in fact the content of this web page
that could convince a friend of this reader to vote for me.
After all, the lack of information about my existence and
goals of my action will probably be the main reason
why many residents of these towns will NOT be able to
vote for me - even that, if they knew about me,
they would probably enthusiastically vote for me.
Fortunately for the candidates, there are various
exceptions to this ban, and there are situations
where this ban does NOT apply. A wider list of
exceptions is given in section labelled "5.5: What
is not an 'election advertisement'?", contained
in the brochure [1#M2] that explains the
rights and responsibilities of candidates for the
elections. In safe PDF format the brochure is
available at the address
www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/final_handbook_-_candidate_feb_2014.pdf.
(Note that in this booklet is also included all
other important information about the election
in which I intend to put my candidacy.) Given
in this booklet examples of such exceptions
from the abovementioned ban include, among
others, a situation when someone other than
the candidate edits a review of news or an
editorial article somewhere on the internet
or in a published journal, and also a situation
when someone else expresses his own political
views online, referring to examples of views of
a candidate for election, or even is repeating
(quoting) examples of views of that candidate.
-->
Part #D:
My political manifesto - means, what are the political goals
of my actions and how I intend to achieve these goals:
#D1.
What I would intend to achieve, if I win the election and obtain
the required support from other politicians and the nation:
Motto:
"In life and in politics one can choose two ways: (1) easy -
which depends on doing what pleases rich and influential
people, or (2) difficult - which consists of doing whatever
God, the Bible, conscience, morality, justice, and love for
fellow humans dictates to us. I chose the way (2) - so I
do NOT expect popularity and compliments, and I am
NOT surprised by obstacles or by words of criticism."
There is a number of urgently needed political,
economic, and social reforms, the implementation
of which is coinciding with the moral requirements
imposed on people by God, and thus the carrying
out of which would significantly increase standards
of life, prosperity, and personal happiness of all New
Zealanders. In case if I am elected to NZ parliament,
then whenever such a kind of reform would be
suggested, I would support it with the entire my
effort and the whole my knowledge. Simultaneously,
I would do everything in my capabilities, to transform
into more moral, all actions which are contradictive
to the requirements of morality, and which in item
#I1 from this web page are described as "bear's
favours" given to inhabitants of New Zealand. Out
of all reforms awaiting to be implemented in New
Zealand, in Hutt Valley and in Petone, the most
urgent in my opinion is just several. Thus, into the
realization of their need and into finding political
allies for their implementation I would put the
most of my effort and energy. Here is the list of
these in my opinion most urgently needed reforms
together with the indications as to whom they turn
most beneficial:
1.
For Petone and for the "Hutt South" electorate -
means reforms and moves which would make easier and
better the life of inhabitants of townships the voters of
which are going to have an opportunity to vote for me:
1a.
The release of ratepayers of the Hutt South electorate from
the increase of cost ofliving due to additional charges imposed
on their rates and designated for the construction of stadiums
or roofs over stadiums. In the initial phase of my election
campaign, for my action with the highest priority I considered
to be the replacement of the project of stadium in Petone, by
any other project that would fulfil better the requirements of
morality - for example, replacing the project of stadium in
Petone described in "part # I" of this web page, which stadium
show all features of a "bear's favour" (disservice), by any other
project which fulfils the criteria of morality - e.g. (a) by
the project of "workshop for inventors" described in the sub-item
"3a" below, or (b) by the project of finishing the completion of the
road tunnel that was drilled in 1930s and that links Petone with Wainuiomata
and the opening this tunnel for the use of motorists (instead of
forcing motorists to travel through the top of mountain range - as
this happens today). However, when on 12 June 2014 it turned out
(as it is explained in item #I5 of this web page) that someone out
there had planned that instead of the increase of rates for the
Hutt South electorate in order to build a stadium in Petone,
it is better to increase the rates of these ratepayers in order
to build a roof over the stadium "Westpac" in Wellington that
is to cost almost a hundred millions of $, my highest priority
becomes now the prevention of
residents of the electorate Hutt South from additional increase
of their rents in someone's attempt to build a roof over any
stadium, or to build a new stadium, and to ensure
that the stadiums will finance by themselves, or that their
financing is to originate from their sponsors or from institutions
whose name they bear, and in no case will come from the
rates of all the inhabitants of the region where these stadiums
are located. Please note here, that I am
NOT against building stadiums or roofs over stadiums, but
against the increase of costs of living of ordinary people
through the extortion of money from ratepayers for building
these stadiums or roofs over stadiums. Also note
that the above goal of my possible efforts in case I am elected
to NZ parliament, is only one amongst a whole range of components
of a much larger goal of my efforts and activities aimed at stopping
the increase in cost of living, which goal is described in the sub-item
"2b" below.
1b.
Introduction of moves agreeable with criteria of morality,
which are to decrease the crime and improve the safety
of work and life in the entire "Hutt South". According
to the article [1#D1] "Family turns hi-tech to snap
thief in act", from page A1 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 2, 2014), in Wellington
district the crime increased by 6.9% during just the last year.
So no-one is surprised anymore by events described in the
article [2#D1] "Stabbed hiker's desperate fight",
from pages A1-2 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Thursday, April 3, 2014). Such a situation
is NOT giving to us the feeling of security. Therefore, I am
assigning a high priority to solving the problem of crime,
although I know, that designing and implementing the
required reforms is a huge challenge - e.g. see item #D4
below. Fortunately, the
philosophy of totalizm
gives to us a hint where we should look for such solutions.
1c.
Improvement of public transport and quality of roads.
For example, the present road labyrinth turns the township
of Petone into a kind of "trap" - what is explained in more
details in item #B3 of my web page named
Petone.
After all, Petone has a shape of a triangle, all three sides
of which are impassable to people (one side is formed by
sea, second side forms the deep "Hutt River" with practically
only one bridge good for escape to more safe areas, third
side is formed by fenced railway and highway - the passes
through which drown in the labyrinth and are blocked for
escaping people. So in case of any cataclysms, e.g. tsunami,
almost all inhabitants of Petone are to die, because the road
labyrinth makes a fast escape impossible for them. A similar
situation prevails in almost all townships from the "Hutt South"
electorate. And we should remember, that under Petone, as
well as under the entire Hutt Valley, runs one of the most
active seismic "faults" of the Southern Hemisphere of
Earth (infamous "ring of fire").
Another direction of efforts to improve the road
situation in Petone and in the entire Hutt South
opens this accidental "stumbling" in the internet
on information described in (2014/7/7) from item
#M2, namely that is already drilled and almost ready
a road tunnel linking Wainuiomata with Petone
shown below on photograph from
Fig. #D1ab.
Morality requires, therefore, that this tunnel is completed
and open for the use by motorists. But probably to do so
it is necessary to yield a significant effort to overcome the
resistance of institutions which benefit from the fact that
the tunnel remains forgotten and unopened, and hence
that brings benefits for these ones whose profits depend
on the increased combustion of fuels, on premature wear
of cars, and on higher taxes.
2.
For the entire New Zealand - means reforms
and moves which would make easier and better the life
of inhabitants of the entire New Zealand (i.e. even the life
of those New Zealanders who will oppose these reforms):
2a.
The reforming or abolishing the so-called "anti-smacking
law", which correctly acting people treats like criminals.
This law, and fruitless efforts of the entire nation, to abolish
it, is described in more details in item #B5.1 from my web page named
will.htm.
2b.
Stopping the spiralling increase of costs of living in NZ,
which is getting out of control. This stopping is going
to require a number of moves. Their example can be,
amongst others, described in item "2d" below elimination
of monopolies. After all, these monopolies are the motive
force behind continuous and unjustified increase of prices.
For example, the article [3#D1] "Kiwis spend
more on food than most", from page B3 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Friday, April 11, 2014), explains that the
costs of food are fifth amongst the most expensive in the
world. And this in spite that New Zealand is one amongst
biggest producers of food in the world. New Zealanders
spend on food around 14% of entire their income, while
e.g. Americans only around 7% of their income.
Another example can be stopping the increase of costs
of living by various local institutions - for example such
as that implementation of costly project, initially of the
stadium in Petone, while now of the roof over the Westpac
stadium in Wellington (see item #I5 below), cost of which
is to be paid through the increase of rates imposed on the
local population.
A significant proportion in the rising cost of living
of New Zealanders have the artificially pushed up
prices of electricity. In spite that in NZ electricity
is produced almost for free in hydroelectric power
plants constructed and financed by taxpayers
money tens of years ago, various individuals who
today manage the distribution of electricity continually
increase its prices in order to multiply their own
incomes and profits - for example, see the article
[1#A3] from item #A3 of this web page. Thus, the
stopping of further increase in electricity prices in
NZ should receive one of the highest priorities.
Moral analysis of the "totaliztic science" reveals,
that this stopping can be obtained in a moral way
by using a relatively simple "law for self-regulating
electricity prices". This law should be so designed,
that it forces suppliers of grid electricity to pay to their customers
exactly the same price for the electricity repurchased from
them, as the price that these customers are paying for the
grid electricity. (At present, the electrical cartel of NZ pays
for the solar electricity that it repurchases much below costs
of the production - which fact I explained more thoroughly
in item #F3 from my web page named
solar.htm.
In the result of such Draconian low price of solar electricity,
these private persons, which allowed to be tricked into the
instalment of "battery-deprived" solar systems in their homes,
which systems by the way are breaking moral criteria, now are
under the threat of a complete loss of purchaser for their electricity
so that are forced to sell their electricity below costs of production.
This means that currently they finance from their own pockets
the excessive profits of NZ electrical cartel.) That "law for self-regulating
electricity prices" should also be so designed, that it would force the
suppliers of grid electricity to repurchase from their customers
a certain percentage of electricity that these customers
would generate e.g. during daylight with their photovoltaic
panells or with own hydro or wind micro-power-stations.
(For example, initially suppliers of electricity could be
required to purchase back let say c=500% of the amount
of electricity purchased previously from these suppliers by
given customers during the previous month because of e.g.
cloud cover, drought, or lack of winds that prevented small
generators of electricity of these customers from work -
but after the price of electricity would drop and started to
stabilize at a lower level, that percentage "c" could be
gradually reduced. Notice also that c=500% means that
every customer who has set his own photovoltaic panels
on the roof of his or her house, would have the right to
sell to electricity suppliers up to 5 times more electricity
than the amount of kilowatts which due to e.g. cloudy
days he or she would be forced previously to purchase
from these suppliers.) Such a law would convert e.g.
night customers into e.g. daily competitors of present
electricity suppliers - fast pushing down the price of this
energy, while simultaneously increasing the ecologically
best ways to produce electricity and also gradually freeing
many consumers of electricity from dependency on work
of large power plants. In conditions of New Zealand the
introduction of such a law would also solve the biggest
problem of this country, which are these so-called
"2 degrees of separation".
Namely, so close, because only 2-degrees apart, relationships
of every inhabitant of NZ with every other resident of this country,
make it virtually impossible to fight against monopolies
and cartels, and to introduce the real competition. This
is because, if a new company is created that supposed
to compete with existing ones, then in its head-office
always is someone who has former classmates or family
members on the boards of these other companies. Thus,
very soon this new company is included in the cartel already
existing companies and together with them begins to behave
like a monopoly - i.e. baselessly it increases prices and
lowers the production. A famous example of this was in
1999, when a newly-established then NZ network of
petrol stations, which supposed to break the cartel-like
behavior of other gas stations, instead soon joined
their cartel to reap similar benefits. However, the law
described here will NOT work that way, because for
the existing cartel which supplies the country with
electricity it will be virtually impossible to eliminate
the competition from its customers imposed by the
law. (Notice that without the law described here, the
suppliers of electricity avoid as they can the repurchasing
from their customers the electricity generated by sun,
wind, or water, and if such a repurchase is somehow
obliged onto them, then they pay only a small fraction
of energy prices that their customers are forced to pay
to them - which fact I explained in the abovementioned
item #F3 from my web page named
solar.htm.)
2c.
Decreasing the inequality and gap between citizens.
From the country which in 1982 had one amongst the smallest
inequalities and gaps between rich and poor (as this is reminded
in item #A1 from this web page), until today New Zealand become
the country which has one amongst the greatest inequalities
and gaps. In turn these are a true source of all social evils and
problems that New Zealand experiences - as this is emphasized,
amongst others, in the article [4#D1] entitled "Poverty
inequality in Aotearoa condemned", from pages 1 and 10 of the monthly
Wel-Com
(issue 315 dated April 2014), or the article [5#D1] "Inequality
drives many to quit NZ", from page A33 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 9, 2014). So it is about time
to introduce in NZ urgently needed reforms, which may prevent
even bigger national problems. An example of one such a
reform can be the introduction of the "maximum wage" which
would be based on scientific findings determining how many
times the productivity of most effectively working people is
higher from the productivity of least effective employers with
the same education and professional experience (such research
were carried out by Software Engineering - for details see
item #J3 from the web page
magnocraft.htm).
That "maximum wage" should also be linked by law with
the "minimum wage", so that if one of them goes up or down,
then the other one also follows.
2d.
Finishing the present epoch of privilege for monopolies
in New Zealand - and thus stopping the increase of
prices of everything that these monopolies control, while
simultaneously the efficiency of production of these
monopolies is falling down.
2e.
Reform of education and opening the possibilities
for gaining a free education by academically most
capable students. For example, the change of
present policy of "investing in worst" by a policy
of "investing in best".
2f.
True reform of legal and criminal system - so that
New Zealanders do NOT need to be afraid of going for
a walk at night, or leaving the safety of their homes or
cars.
2g.
Opening ways for the increase of contribution of technical
knowledge to parliament debates and complementing decisions
taken during these debates by checks with criteria of morality.
There is an obvious link between a level of expertise available
to members of parliament, and the accuracy and quality
of decisions which these members make. But if one listens
to present debates in NZ parliament, the technical knowledge
is poorly represented in these debates, while criteria
of morality discussed in items #I1 and #J1 of this web page
almost never are taken under consideration. An outcome
is, that too-frequently decisions that the parliament makes
turn out to be "bear's favours"
given to citizens of the country. On the other hand, my technical
knowledge in two disciplines (i.e. in Mechanical Engineering
and in Computer Sciences) would allow finding ways for extending
the access of technical expertise to debates. This in turn
would allow the parliament to detect imperfections of projects
being approved already on the stage of making decisions
about them. So there would NOT appear situations as that
with the New Zealand "Novopay" system for counting teachers
earnings, or the situation with approval by Japanese of the
construction in Fukushima of the elementary-faulty nuclear
reactors, which in case of almost any interference with their
work were destined to melt down - as this is described in
items #M1 and #M1.1 from the web page
telekinetics.htm.
In turn the knowledge which stems from my research
and development of the
philosophy of totalizm
indicates also clear moral criteria, like these from item
#J2 of this web page, the consideration of which
in decision making would allow to choose solutions which
are deprived of negative so-called "side effects", and thus
which for the population affected by them would give
"true favours".
3.
For you - means reforms and moves which
would make easier and better the life of specifically you
(i.e. the reader of this web page) - if these are introduced
in your place of living:
3a.
The initiation of a project of formation of a chain of
"workshops for inventors" in every larger city of
New Zealand. Furthermore, making sure that the
financing of construction
of these "workshops for inventors" is NOT going to additionally
increase the poverty of local population of cities in
which these workshops are to be formed - means, that
their financing is NOT going to depend on an increase
in rates, but receives either governmental funding, or
in entirety is going to be paid up by volunteers-philanthropists.
In these workshops various inventors and "Do It Yourself"
(DIY) people, would have a free access to machine tools,
tools, and to measuring equipment, which would be needed
by them for the completion of their inventions, ideas, and
home improvements of the DIY type.
(Of course, only machine tools, tools, measuring equipment,
and expert assistance would be available in these workshops
for free - for materials from which the improvements and
inventions would be made users would still need to pay,
except that in justified cases these workshops would assist
them in the purchase of materials which ordinary citizens
are unable to purchase in NZ, for example, such as those
described in item #D5 below.) The existence of a chain of
such workshops, from one hand would continually increase
the comfort and quality of life of many less wealthy people,
on the other hand it would increase the technical know-how
and practical skills in the entire country, as well as it would
advance of the technical progress of the country. As such,
these workshops NOT only that would lift up the level of science
and technology in NZ, but also would contribute to an increase
of the overall quality of New Zealand homes, farms and gardens,
to a decrease of prices of homes, to the restoration of traditional
role of husband and head of family, to the freeing of inventive
potential of all people, etc., etc.
After I published the above intention that in case
I am elected I am going to insist on the creation
in NZ of a chain of these workshops for inventions,
two different investors practicing totalizm contacted
me with an offer that those
investors would be willing to finance the construction
and the equipping of such a workshop in
Petone.
However, my past experience, that I described in item
#D5 below on this web page, suggest that just the
construction and equipping of such a workshop has
NO chance to bring the expected success, because
this construction so-far is NOT accompanied by
simultaneous neutralization of the "curse of inventors"
and "inventive impotency" through creating the required
legal climate and through implementing of the educational
moves that would start to eliminate human attitudes
of the type "I will NOT let you". Therefore, all actions on
the physical building of the first of such workshops for
inventors will probably have to wait until the time when
in NZ parliament someone starts to wisely and prudently
implement the required changes to legislations and to
the philosophy of the educational system - for more
details see item #D5 below on this web page.
3b.
Reforming of health services - so that e.g. the present
queues to life saving operations would disappear, while
people would stop dying only because they have NOT lived
long enough for their turn in queues to operations could
come. One of the changes which I would try to pass in parliament,
is that each person whose earnings
lie below a specific "threshold of poverty" (i.e. threshold that
still awaits to be scientifically determined - as it lies somewhere
below equivalents of 5 to 7 "minimum wages"), every year is
to receive one free visit to a doctor of his or her own choice,
which one visit would be paid by government.
This single free visit a year would provide poor people with
a number of blessings. For example, it would save the country
enormous amount of money now spend on efforts of curing
illnesses for curing of which is too late ("prevention is cheaper
than intervention"). It would also decrease queues to doctors,
as they would NOT be busy with difficult cases because these
cases would be detected when are still small problems.
It would decrease the bureaucracy existing in present
management of numerous governmental programs of
free medical services for only selected social groups
(e.g. programs of breast cancer or cervical cancer in
women of specific ages). It would decrease the prevailing
feeling of inequality, favouritism and injustice that result
from the present programs of free medical services for
only selected illnesses and for only selected social groups,
ages and genders. It would increase the general health of
the population as now many low-income citizens place
preventive visiting a doctor as the least important item
of their expenses. Etc. etc.
3c.
The restoration of roles that are designated by God to family,
marriages, parents, etc. For example, such reforming,
or replacing by a different one, the infamous "anti-smacking
law" described in more details in item #B5.1 from the web page named
will.htm,
so that it stops turning caring parents into criminals, but
starts really decrease the abuse of children. Also, for example,
a complete elimination of advertisements from the governmental
television channel "TV1" and imposing on this channel so strict
moral requirements, that from the present "generator of profits"
this particular channel is transformed into a channel of morally
correct entertainment and information for the entire family, in
which shown are positive and constructive models of family,
marriage, parents, husbands, wives and children, from which
future generations of citizens could draw positive role models
and behavioural guidelines, in which information provided
would be unbiased, broad, and meaningful, etc., etc.
* * *
If one carefully looks through the above reforms,
then he or she is to notice, that in present realities
of New Zealand, they are still impossible to be
implemented by even the most popular head
of country or by the most powerful political party.
This is why none amongst
political parties existing in NZ at present would have
a sufficient courage to openly support and implement
reforms and political moves that I postulate above.
So it would also be unrealistic and unscientific
to expect, that a novice as myself would be able
to implement these reforms just alone. Therefore,
reforms and goals of
my efforts, which I am listing here, should NOT
be taken for my electoral promises.
After all, as a scientist and a realist I am well aware,
that one needs to accomplish much more, than
just win elections, to be able to introduce to life
such significant political, economic, and social
reforms - even if these reforms are aimed at
improvement of quality of life of all citizens of
the country - including these ones who will oppose
such reforms. (These, who do NOT agree with me,
I encourage to recall, when in NZ was introduced
the last reform which really make easier and more
pleasant the life of the majority of inhabitants of the
country.) Therefore, through indicating the above
reforms and moves, I am signalling what kinds of
goals and actions will get my full support, while
to implement which I will do everything in my power.
Also, the task of adding my contribution to the
implementation of these reforms, I would elevate
to be the main goal of everything that I would
do if I win the election. However, before these
reforms can be implemented, firstly I would need
to find a significant number (in fact the parliamentary
majority) of political allies and gain their support.
This in turn will take a lot of time and a huge effort -
which, however, cannot be even started if one is
NOT included into the ranks of members of
parliament.
Fig. #D1ab:
Here is a photo (#D1a) and a video (#D1b) showing
the appearance of mysterious "gates" that according
to my research may be leading to "UFO tunnels".
However, people are NOT able to get into these
tunnels. In turn, UFOnauts and their UFO starships
are easily able to penetrate into them using the
telekinetic propulsion which gives them the ability
to penetrate through solid objects. Top photo
Fig. #D1a shows a barred entrance gate
keeping people away from the mysterious tunnel
connecting the towns of Petone with Wainuiomata
in New Zealand - see its broader description in
#D1a below. In turn, the lower starting panel of
the video from #D1b below also shows a gate
impassable by people to probably one of the most
famous "UFO tunnels" in the world, located in Peru.
The fact that UFOnauts using telekinetic propulsion
are able to penetrate through walls, rocks, steel
grates and through any other solid objects, is
documented, for example, by my photos of traces
of such a UFOnaut telekinetically crossing a brick
fence - which I showed (and described) in
Fig. #K3f and #K3f22 (click on this green link to view the first one)
from my other web page named
petone.htm.
The fact that UFOnauts and telekinetic UFO starships
still secretly use such UFO tunnels is confirmed by
mysterious phenomena and events that take place
in and near the "UFO tunnel" called Jin Cave
and located in South Korea, a photo of the entrance
to which I showed in the photograph from Fig. #11
to my web page named
korea.htm.
I wonder if a possible motion-sensitive camera capable of
filming with infrared in the dark, which, if well hidden,
would document the entrance to the upper gate of the
tunnel in Petone, would be able to record phenomena
and events similar to those that mysteriously occur in
the "Jin Cave" from Korea. This, in turn, would perhaps
explain, for example, why so many evidences of UFO
activities appear in the city of Petone - for their
documentation see #K1 to #K6 and #I3 and #H2 from the web page
petone.htm,
and would also explain why in the forests surrounding
the town of Wainuiomata so many people disappear -
e.g. how many disappearances take place in only one
of these forests called "Rimutaka Forest Park"
can be searched for e.g. with the keywords:
Rimutaka disappearance .
(Click on the photo or video if you want to see it in more detail.)
Fig. #D1a (top).
This is what the entrance to the mysterious tunnel, protected by
metal grates, looks like from the Petone side. This tunnel is connecting
the two neighboring cities of Petone and Wainuiomata in New Zealand -
which, if it were not for the mountain range that divides them, could
constitute a single city. I described this mysterious tunnel in more
detail in 1c and 1a from item #D1 above and in the paragraph marked
(2014/7/7) from item #M2 of this web page, and moreover,
its secrets are also discussed in item #N2 of the web page named
newzealand_visit_pl.htm.
If it were open and had a sidewalk, then people could even walk
between the towns of Petone and Wainuiomata. Currently, however,
due to the need to overcome a steep mountain, it is impossible to
walk between these two towns.
#D1b (down).
Here is the starting picture for video on the famous stone entrance
gate that cannot be opened by humans, probably leading to a "UFO
tunnel" hidden from humans. This gate is located in Peru in the location
"Amaru Muru" near Lake Titicaca. It is illustrated, among others, by
a 5:50-minute English-language video titled "Mysterious Ancient
Portal Of Amaru Muru Near Lake Titicaca In Peru". Everyone may
be surprised by its functional similarity to the entrance gate from the
tunnel in Petone, NZ, barred by the authorities. Being located in a
secluded place, this gate invites us to investigate its secrets by, for
example, starting to observe it with a hidden camera sensitive to
motion and also operating on infrared radiation, or with a
"device for detecting objects hidden from people's sight
with a state of telekinetic flickering" - the structure and
operation of which is described in Polish by our free
treatise [7b].
Perhaps such a camera or device would make it possible to
record what is happening at this gate, e.g. at night, and thus
perhaps make it possible to decipher why this tunnel was
dug in this particular secluded place and why since 1932
the authorities have been constantly avoiding putting it
into use by people. Currently, there are probably over
a hundred similar to it gates to underground "UFO tunnels"
hidden in the mountains from people. For example, only
on YouTube numerous videos documenting them can be
searched with the keywords:
mountain door .
The best example of the mysterious operation of stone gates
to such UFO tunnels is documented, for example, by an
11-second video from the address
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMaf8jIYgzI .
In Poland, a hidden gate to the UFO tunnel is also supposed
to be located on the Slovak side of "Babia Góra" - as I described
it in #G3 of the web page
aliens_pl.htm
and in post #298 to blogs of totalizm.
#D2.
My "zero-dollar" ($0) campaign and its goals - means the
campaign on which the situation forces me to spend zero dollars:
Although it may sound naive, I believe in the
effectiveness of long-term accomplishments
of even a "zero-dollar" = "$0" election campaign -
means the campaign for which I would like
to spend almost zero dollars (or as little, as
possible). The New Zealand electoral law allows
to spend on own campaign up to $ 25,000.
For sure I will have to compete with candidates
who will officially spend those $ 25,000 on their
campaigns.
Probably, if I tried very hard, then I could also get
those $25,000 for my campaign. After all, instead
of standing for election as an "independent", I
could, for example, organize my own political
party - of the kind of the "party of totalizm"
described in more details on my web page named
partia_totalizmu_uk.htm.
After all, New Zealand has a history of political
parties based on the convincing for voters power
of a single person of the leader. However,
I decided that in this election, my "zero-dollar"
campaign will allow me to achieve additional
goals, which well-financed campaign would
not be able to accomplish. Let us indicate here
most important out of these additional goals:
1.
Convincing other politicians (potential allies), that New
Zealand urgently needs deep reforms. The point
is, that every success in the election accomplished by
a candidate, who used a "zero-dollar" campaign, but
instead of money he offered the idea of deep reforms,
may convince other politicians, who so-far would NOT
dare to come up with such reforms, that the deep reforms
of this type are urgently needed in New Zealand. This
in turn may cause, that other politicians become more
inclined to support such reforms and that these reforms
may actually be carried out one day.
2.
Convincing voters about the level of my determination
in my goals and intentions. If in fact I had some
significant results with a "zero-dollar" campaign, this
will mean that my results will be disproportionately
higher when I start to have the required funds.
3.
Collecting the statistical data on the actual effectiveness
of the methods that I use for the campaign. If I had
spent on this campaign a certain sum of money, then I
would NOT know whether my results are the outcomes
of the methods that I have used, or are the result of the
sum that I spent.
4.
Saving my potential to find sponsors, until the crucial
elections. Sponsors typically invest only once in the
candidate which had NO success. On the other hand, the
elections in 2014 are NOT decisive. For I am preparing
myself for a long-term action during more than just one
election - which fact I explained in items #E1 and #E2 of
this web page. So the decisive election will probably be
the next one, and it will be then that I will need sponsors
and spending for my campaign. Due to the use of "zero-dollar"
campaign I will save my potential to find sponsors until
that decisive campaign.
#D3.
Just the standing for this election also
will allow me to achieve several goals:
Even if I lose the current election of 2014, still
only through standing for them, letting other
people to know my political manifesto, and
accomplishing a satisfactory number of votes,
I will also achieve several goals described in
more detail in the next "part #E" of this web
page. For example, regardless of the learning
and testing the democratic process in NZ, my
efforts should allow me to accumulate a sufficient
dose of knowledge and experience that these,
in turn, later should allow me to win one of the
next elections. After all, the time and the situation
of people are working in my favour. In addition,
the public presentation of my political manifesto
from item #D1, in the event of gaining a satisfactory
number of votes, probably will bring closer to me
various overt or silent allies, who will later work
with me for reforms and for the implementation
of whatever I am describing here.
#D4.
Every problem contains in itself at least one morally correct
solution - one only needs to put the required intellectual
effort into finding this solution:
There is such a thing as a "brainstorming",
which allows one to find solutions to virtually
every problem. If one thinks about it, also every
problem that is troubling NZ or any other country,
in fact do have a number of possible solutions.
However, only those solutions that meet tough
criteria of morality, are devoid of adverse, so-called
"side effects". Unfortunately, the problem is, whether
a given group of decision-makers can choose from
a number of these solutions this best one, which in
a given situation meets all moral criteria, and thus
which with the passage of time will NOT introduce
these adverse side effects (i.e. side effects which in item #I1 of
this web page are called the "bear's favour"), and also whether
there is someone who will be able to implement
this best solution. As an example, I suggest to the
reader to consider a problem of stopping a further
growth of crime in the country, and then to chose
a solution to this problem, which later will NOT
introduce undesirable side effects. To assist the
reader in considering possible solutions to this
problem, below I am indicating a few examples
of such solutions - these are NOT all possible
solutions, but just several most representative
ones. And so, the problem of an increase in crime
can be solved e.g. by (a) factual and evidential
informing and educating people about the scientific
evidence for the existence of God and about the
actual moral requirements that God imposes on
our lives - the compliance with which requirements
God enforces with an iron hand. This educating
could be accomplished e.g. through introducing the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity (CDG)
to formal education. The same problem of crime
can also be solved by (b) elimination of
poverty. NZ already tries to solve it by (c)
paying psychologists and teachers to heal and to
teach prisoners. A solution could also be (d)
to assign a policeman to every citizen (and a more
superior watchman to each watchman). A kind of
solution is also e.g. (e) the "Australian model"
which depends on letting convicts to serve their
sentences in different countries, for example in
Indonesia or in Papua New Guinea. In addition to the
above, the reader probably himself or herself can
come up with several further solutions to the same
problem. But which one amongst these solutions,
in the reader's opinion does NOT introduce undesirable
side effects and can be quickly implemented in practice?
(Notice also here, that a similar number of possible
solutions can be found for virtually every other problem
of a social, economic, political, or technical nature.
So it is worth that in parliament were people with
unconventional (lateral) way of thinking - such as
the way of thinking to which I am used.)
#D5.
How to protect our inventors and discoverers from persecution
by the so-called "inventive impotency" and "curse of inventors":
Motto:
"Because of a complex level of today's devices and technology,
virtually do NOT exist truly new inventions, which could be
developed, while the society in which inventors of these devices
live, creates and implements the progress inhibiting laws of the type
'it is forbidden', and tolerates immoral attitudes of the type 'I will NOT let you'."
As it turns out, most of the mechanisms that
govern our fate, God wisely pre-programmed
on principles of "self-regulation". An excellent
example of such a "self-regulation" are the moral
mechanisms that govern over the development
and implementation of new discoveries and
inventions, described under the names of
"inventive impotency" and the "curse of inventors"
e.g. in item #G1 from the separate web page named
eco_cars.htm.
For example, the "curse of inventors"
causes that in countries where the level of the
collective morality of the entire nation falls below
a certain threshold, inventors and discoverers
are subjected to such persecution by their
countrymen, that are unable to implement
and disseminate their creative ideas. So in a
result of such widespread persecution of the
discoverers and inventors, countries or nations
with such low levels of morality are declining and
over time are absorbed or colonized by countries
or nations with higher levels of morality - which
establish in them a new order and thus restore
their level of morality. An excellent illustration
of this self-regulatory mechanism is the fate
of the New Zealand builder of one of the first
aircrafts in the world, named "Richard Pearse",
whose quite typical for inventors fate is described
in items #D1 and #D2 from the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm,
or are fates of inventors described in items
#H1 to #H1.6 from the web page named
newzealand_visit.htm.
For example, because Richard Pearse was
trying to build an airplane which was unknown
yet at that time, his own countrymen called him
names, while with their taunts, mockery and
persecution they drove him to a mental hospital.
They also did not let his legacy to spread over
the world. Only now they erect him monuments
and build museums - although it is too late, since
he died, while the first airplane that entered
permanently to accomplishments of the humanity
has been built and promulgated by the Wright
Brothers from the USA. This is why, the leading
manufacturer and user of airplanes until today
remains the USA, NOT New Zealand.
For a valid reason I emphasize here the relationship
between the invention, the first building, and the
dissemination of aircraft in the USA, and the leading
role that the USA has in the world in the construction
and use of airplanes. This is because my research
carried out in accordance with the principles of the
"totaliztic science" reveal a highly repetitive rule, that
the country and the nation,
which due to its moral acting and a collective effort,
as the first country in the world manages to overcome
an instant (short-term) resistance from the "curse of
inventors" in building and in dissemination of an invention
which generates for people moral products of its operation,
is then rewarded in a long-term with a world's leading
role in the production of this invention and in the
benefiting from the fruits of its operation.
This fact is clearly documented by a significant number
of inventions. For example, consider a country that as
the first in the world developed a movie camera. Still even
today it leads the world in the benefiting from the production
and sale of various movies. Or consider a country which built
the railroads and trains as the first in the world. To this day
it remains the leader in the construction of quality railroads
and trains, as well as in benefiting from the use of them.
Or consider the country in which the first internal combustion
car was built. The reputation of it as a producer and a user
of cars until today tops in the world. On a similar principle
it is not difficult to establish which nation and country rips
the greatest benefits from the development and dissemination
of the Diesel engine. Etc., etc. (Notice, however, that
the country which as the first developed and disseminated
an invention that yields immoral products of its operation,
is treated in an opposite manner - which stems from the
way in which works the "moral field" discussed below in
this item, and also in item #J1.)
The problem with the "inventive impotency"
and with the "curse of inventors" lies in the fact, that
in present immoral times they began to paralyze the
progress in practically almost the entire world.
For example, at present I know of only two countries
in the world, such as Germany and South Korea, in
which these moral phenomena certainly had not yet
completely paralyze the creative achievements of
their discoverers and inventors. In the rest of the
world a truly new (i.e. previously completely unknown)
discoveries and inventions have entirely disappeared.
If in there something is described as "new", in fact this
is only an old idea which is dressed in some new knick-knacks.
So if people do NOT learn to counteract the escalation
of these phenomena of "inventive impotency" and the
"curse of inventors" with wise moves and laws, then very
soon our world will begin to increasingly accelerate the
already noticeable turning back in its development. After
all, this dynamic "moral field" described in items #J1, #I1
and #N2 from this web page, is intentionally pre-programmed
so wisely, that those who lie with their bellies up and do
NOT do anything, means which stopped in the required
from people constant climbing uphill in the moral field
towards the morality and towards the progress, this field
automatically pushes down into stagnation and backwardness -
as this is described e.g. in item #A2.1 from the web page named
totalizm.htm,
in item #E3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
and in item #F1 from the totaliztic web page named
rok_uk.htm.
In this item I am going to present my findings regarding: from what
a wise counteracting of the escalation of "inventive impotency"
and the "curse of inventors" should begin.
It just so happens that I have experienced quite
a lot because of action of the "curse of inventors"
and "inventive impotency" - e.g. see descriptions
from item #N2 of this web page. Thus, I devoted
much attention, data collecting, research and
thinking to these self-regulatory moral phenomena.
As I established, the action
of the "curse of inventors" and "inventive impotency",
is just one in a large diversity of possible manifestations
of the instant (short-term) resistance, that the so-called
"moral field" places in front of every morally-correct
action of people. (The instant, as well as
the long-term, work of the "moral field", are described
in more detail in items #F5, #I1, #J1, #N2 and #N4 of
this web page.) This instant work of the moral field
(i.e. the "curse of inventors" and "inventive impotency"),
always incorporates at least five different ways
of the simultaneous blocking of the creative actions
of inventors and discoverers, namely: (1) physical
preventing of the completion and popularization,
(2) blocking the action by laws and regulations
of the type "this is forbidden" (means by the so-called
"red tape" -
with which name in NZ are described the legal
obstacles and bureaucracy), (3) isolation and
stigmatizing inventors and escalation towards
them various personal attacks, harassment,
insults, etc., (4) the prevalence of attitudes of
the type "I will NOT let you" amongst decision-makers
and superiors of inventors or discoverers, and
(5) taking away from inventors and discoverers
the opportunities to benefit from fruits of the
implementation of their creative ideas. Let us
now discuss separately each of these ways
of blocking the progress.
(1) The physical preventing of completion and
popularization involves the formation of such a
situation in a given country or nation, that inventors
and discoverers do NOT receive in there any chance
for a physical completion of prototypes
of their inventions, nor for publishing and disseminating
amongst other people the new ideas that they managed
to discover and to work out. As a result, although
statistically in every country there is a number of
creative people with new ideas, in countries with
below the threshold level of morality, their ideas
do NOT receive any chance to reach the state of
implementation and to enter permanently to the
accomplishments of entire mankind, or at least a given
country. So in order to break the deadlock in this
regard, it is necessary to take such initiatives as
e.g. the one that is described in "3a" from item
#D1 of this web page - i.e. the creation of a chain
of "workshops for inventors". After all, one
of the primary obstacles in research and development
of a prototype of any invention, is the lack of manufacturing
capabilities, means the lack of access to suitably equipped
workshop with tools and machine tools, lack of access
to expensive measuring instruments that are required
to develop the necessary improvements of the prototype,
and often also the inability to purchase the required
materials, components and parts. This is because to
teach people morality, God almost never gives new
ideas to those ones who have opportunities to complete
them. So typical inventors almost never can afford to
buy the necessary tools, machine tools, materials, parts
and measuring instruments. In some countries there is
a belief that these physical limitations can be overcome
by financing - for example, through the grants for inventions
and for research. However, there are also various problems
with such initiatives as grants for inventions and for research.
The most important of these is the scarcity of these grants.
For example, the only such a NZ initiative known to me, is
described in the article [1#D5] "Labour promises boost
for IT sector", from page C9 of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post Weekend
(issue dated on Saturday-Sunday, July 12-13, 2014). It relates
to the distant future (when the Labour Party is to govern), and
it promises to New Zealand creators and inventors a "garage
grants" in the amount of $NZ 10,000. Thus, if an inventor
wanted to develop an IT system that requires e.g. to build a
new hardware, this sum is even too small for him to acquire
a high-quality oscilloscope - which is the basic instrument
for the construction of the new hardware. So if in addition
to this grant, the inventor would NOT have a free access
to the oscilloscope from, for example, one of the "workshops
for inventors" which I proposed to build in item #D1, then
the lack of such access would block the implementation of
his idea. Another problem with financial grants is the bureaucracy
that accompanies their giving. Although grants are public
money which obviously should be carefully accounted for,
still the responsibility for documenting their spending should
lie with the bodies that grant them, NOT on the shoulders
of inventors and discoverers. Inventors and discoverers should
only receive the funding and get on with the work for which
the money is intended - that is with the advancement of their
inventions or discoveries. However, the bodies awarding
grants typically push all the bureaucracy on the shoulders
of inventors or discoverers. As a result, instead of working
on their inventions or discoveries, these highly creative
people spend their time filling in a mountain of papers,
applications, forms, plans, reports, etc. Yet another problem
of financial grants lies in the fact, that money alone do NOT
suffice to overcome the resistance of the moral field. Thus,
giving money must simultaneously be accompanied with the
elimination of laws and regulations of the type "it is disallowed"
(which hamper the creative work with the "red tape"), as
well as it must be accompanied by the change of the human
attitudes of the type "I will NOT let you", into the attitudes
"YES, I will help you". Otherwise, for example initiatives of the kind
of abovementioned $NZ 10,000 of the "garage grant" from the
article [1#D5], for sure will always "come to nothing", because
they are NOT accompanied by the required removal of legal
obstacles of the type "it is disallowed", nor there is done anything
to change the people's attitude of the type "I will NOT let you".
In the previous paragraph I mentioned difficulties that
many inventors have, among others, in making a
purchase of the necessary materials and components.
The reason is that, for example, in NZ acts a ban on
selling of many types of materials, components and parts
to ordinary citizens. This ban is often driven by the immoral
intention of supporting monopolies. For a one amongst
several examples of work of such a ban, see my trouble
with an attempt to purchase the programmer for a washing
machine, described in the final paragraph of item #P5 from
the page named
quake.htm.
In a similar way as this programmer, I also recently cannot
buy in NZ an ordinary anti-mosquitoes metal mesh to be
placed on doors or windows of the flat. This is because
for the instalment of such mesh-doors, just a few selected
companies have a monopoly. It also seems that by a
similar ban is covered in NZ the sale of photovoltaic
cells for solar power - so that a cheap DIY installation of these cells
by the users themselves have NOT been introducing a competition
for companies maintaining a monopoly on the lucrative business
of instalment of these solar power cells on the roofs of houses
(this possible ban I still have to check and to confirm, when after
the elections I find some spare time to continue my previous
attempts to purchase such solar panels). So in order inventors
are able to effectively overcome this type of purchase bans, it is
necessary that, amongst others, the discussed here "workshops
for inventions" received (to be legislated yet by the NZ parliament)
the right to import free of duty, or to buy tax-free directly from
the manufacturers, raw materials and components that may
be necessary for inventors which are to use the services of
these workshops.
(2) The blocking of inventiveness and creativity
by laws and regulations of the type "it is prohibited",
reveals itself in binding people with creative minds
by a destructive to their creativity the so-called "red
tape". After all, in present countries is multiplied so
many legal restrictions and laws, that when an inventor
or creator is trying to accomplish something new and
untypical, then sooner or later he runs onto various
legal restrictions or bans, which are blocking his work - for
an example of just such a situation, see the web page named
boiler.htm.
But new inventions and creative ideas rely heavily on making
something new and untypical - which is usually forbidden by
the existing laws. For example, at NZ universities the receiving
of any financial grant to carry out research and experiments
is associated with such a mass of "paperwork" of the kind of
writing applications, preparation of plans, justification, approval,
reporting, etc., that it would be easier to get the required funds
through washing cars rather than by applying for grants. As
a result, in NZ almost are NOT carried out at all any complex
scientific experiments, nor are build prototypes of experimental
devices. So in order to overcome such a destructive work of the
"red tape", the intervention is needed at the level of NZ parliament,
which would depend on the creation of a completely different laws
and regulations, which would help the inventiveness and creativity,
instead of blocking them.
(3) Somehow so happens, that people with
a low (fallen) morality always react with anger,
jealousy, attacks, etc., against anyone who in
their own opinion threatens their ego by doing
something that other people can perceive as a
good deed, moral act, progress, significant discovery,
important invention, significant achievement, etc.
Also, they are to react so negatively for as long as
other people tacitly accept and even support their
immoral behaviour. As a result of this kind of reactions
of immoral people, virtually every inventor and discoverer
is inundated with an avalanche of insults, curses, accusations,
invented ridicules, jokes, etc. If the reader does NOT believe,
then I would suggest to learn a true history of any
significant invention or discovery, and a history of the person
who made it. So if a given inventor turns out to be sensitive
to this kind of personal attacks, then these attacks are able
to send him even to a mental hospital. But even when his
personal immunity can save him from such a mental collapse,
still these personal attacks are a source of indescribable
amount of pain, disappointment, grief, discouragement, etc.,
which only exceptionally resistant individuals are able to
endure and still continue their efforts. So this murky aspect
of making inventions and discoveries means, that a number
of inventors and discoverers who persevered to the end with
the development and dissemination of their groundbreaking
invention or discovery, is so small, that there are numerous
countries in the world, including NZ, about which no-one in
the world has ever heard that they developed and implemented
any groundbreaking invention or important discovery.
(4) A major source of blocking of creative activities
is also the attitude "I will NOT let you" in decision-makers
and in superiors. For example, even if the rules,
tradition and fashion allow that something has been
done towards supporting of a morally correct new idea,
still people on whom depends a decision in a given
case will issue the decision "you are NOT allowed".
The reason is that such a decision releases them from
the responsibility for everything that undesirably for them could happen
in the future. And we know that in a situation of actually
implementing some new ideas there is a lot of room for
human errors and mistakes. After all, the philosophy of
totalizm discovered that this is just through our failures,
mistakes and errors that we ourselves learn, while all
of humanity generates the progress. Moreover, the
blocking of new ideas gives to these incompetent
decision-makers the feeling, that they prevent the
situation when their subordinate employee can
create a competition to their cushy job. Thus, a
typical reaction of decision-makers to someone
coming out with a new idea is "why
I should risk that something will NOT come out right and
that I will be held accountable, or even I lose my cushy
job, if now I can decide 'I will NOT let you' and thus I
can prevent all future problems - after all, this is NOT
my idea, hence its implementation in my opinion does
NOT lie in my private interest". The easiest
way to eliminate this source of blockage would occur if
schools began to teach the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity (CDG) and the
philosophy of totalizm -
thus balancing with them the today's culture of laziness
and greed induced by the deceitful statements of the old
official science. This is because CDG and totalizm reveal
to us, amongst others, that each defeat of an inventor in
the completion of his new idea, actually reduces the quality
of life of NOT only his own countrymen, but also all the
inhabitants of our planet, since the dynamic "moral field"
works in such a way that "doing nothing" actually turns
into moving backward - for the explanation of this phenomenon
see e.g. item #F1 from the totaliztic web page named
rok_uk.htm.
So in the interest of all of us is to NOT sit on our
hands, but actively assist inventors and discoverers
in the implementation of their new ideas. An
elimination of refusals concerning inventions and
discoveries can also be accomplished through wise laws
and organisational moves - e.g. through the creation of a
special decisive body which would be completely independent
from superiors of inventors and discoverers in a given
institution.
(5) The human nature and our sense of justice is
such, that the motivation
to contribute into something a huge effort, suffering
and sacrifice, appears only if there is a real chance
for the subsequent benefiting from the fruits of whatever
someone is doing. But if we analyze the
history of inventions and discoveries, and the fate of
people who made them, then it turns out that the
inventors and discoverers themselves, who introduced
something really moral to the lasting achievements of
our civilization, practically never have the opportunity
for personal benefiting from fruits of implementing their
creative ideas. (Although moral field works in such a
manner that from fruits of own work always do benefit
instantly the inventors and discoverers which created
something immoral, i.e. something that when used on
a long-term basis reveals numerous undesirable side-effects
and starts to work to the detriment of individual people
and the entire human civilization - as examples,
consider the discoverers of radioactivity, the builders of
the first atomic bomb, inventors of pesticides-DDT and
antibiotics-penicillin, creator of the theory of relativity,
etc., etc., commented, amongst others, in item #H3 from the web page
mozajski_uk.htm,
and in item #J1 from this web page.) After all, the
history shows, that from fruits of the effort of such
moral creators always benefit someone completely
different, and often only after their death. They
themselves typically die in poverty and obscurity, in
addition often harassed, mocked and despised. Such
historically documented typical fates of inventors and
discoverers are a source of serious discouragement.
Thus, individual nations and countries should NOT
shirking from taking the responsibility for rewarding
their inventors and discoverers still during their lives,
for the actual contribution of moral actions which they
have made. Unfortunately, the historical experience
reassures us about the inevitability of something quite
opposite, while present inventors and discoverers are
increasingly more aware of the meanings of these lessons
of history. So more and more difficult is in such a situation
to maintain until the end the motivation to implement
whatever is invented or discovered.
Let us summarize this item #D5. Although
two investors who practice totalizm expressed
willingness to invest in the construction in Petone
of the "workshop for inventors" about which I write
in "3a" from in item #D1 of this web page, there is
NO sense to charge someone with the difficulty
and cost of building and equipping such a workshop
while there is NO chance that the workshop is to
succeed in current circumstances. The reason is
that still there is NO preparation for the opening
of these workshops, in the form of required legal
environment and human attitudes. So even if such
"workshops for inventions" have now been built,
then still, because of the progress-blocking today's legal
climate of the type "it is prohibited", and because
of the attitudes of people of the type "I will NOT
let you", for certain it is to prove, that they are
unable to overcome the current level of "inventive
impotency" and "curse inventors", which is reigning
in NZ. But I hope that if someone in NZ parliament
finally starts to wisely, prudently and systematically
alter the content of existing laws and regulations
from the type "this is prohibited" onto the laws and
regulations of the type "we will help you", and also
starts to introduce to schools the teaching of new
theories and philosophies of the type of CDG and
totalizm - which are to counterbalance the lies and
distortions spread by the old official science, then
this required legal climate and human attitude can
be repaired. In turn, after their repair, all inhabitants
of this country would benefit, and consequently the
inhabitants of the entire our planet would also be
better off.
Part #E:
What goals I intend to achieve merely by standing
in elections of 2014 to the New Zealand parliament:
#E1.
I am a scientist and a realist - so I prepared myself for a lot of difficulties and resistance in my actions:
In Poland we have a saying "a big city
cannot be built at once" (in the original
Polish wording "NIE od razu Kraków zbudowano").
As a realist and a scientist I am well aware
that this proverb applies also to my goals and
intentions described on this web page. After all,
it would be almost
a miracle if a scientist, Dr Jan Pajak,
almost completely unknown in New Zealand,
won election to parliament without any problems
and difficulties in the electorate, which for many
years is a "fortress" for the New Zealand's
"Labour Party" - and voters of which traditionally
choose candidates from that party.
Because I research scientifically, among other things,
"methods of God's acting", I am also well aware,
that several principles by which God systematically
acts, prevents the occurrence of an open and
unambiguously interpretable miracle in the matter
of my efforts to improve the situation of people
and the democratic introduction of positive reforms -
for more details I suggest to read the example of
the divine method of upbringing of people, described
under the name "principle of reversals",
among others, in item #F3 from my web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm,
and in item #B1.1 of a different web page named
antichrist.htm.
(Notice, however, that God likes to create unambiguous miracles,
means miracles which have at least one more explanation of a
"rational" kind - e.g. such as the miracle described in item #N4
from this web page.) Therefore, to accomplish a success in
my goals and intentions, realism tells me to prepare myself
for a laborious overcoming difficulties which I am
to encounter continually on my path - as already now
this fact is confirmed by events described in item #N3
from this web page. After all, if I persevere through
such difficulties, then this would provide a second
"rational" explanation to a possible miracle of my winning.
#E2.
The goals that I intend to achieve in elections of 2014:
Due to standing with my candidacy in the elections
of 2014, I intend to achieve the following goals of
my acting:
1.
To get to know exactly the process and formalities
of political democracy in New Zealand.
Although many people are NOT accustomed
to planning further than "tonight", surely it
should NOT bother anyone that I proceed
in the manner to which I am used - so I plan
my actions for several years ahead.
2.
To realize to voters of the electorate "Hutt South" that
I prepared myself for an acting with a scientific
approach to the election. In other words, indicate
to voters, that I am serious about the acting with the
use of a scientific approach to my efforts.
3.
To begin the exerting a continuous pressure on decision-makers
from my electorate to better began paying attention to the goals
that I set for myself in my manifesto (e.g. regarding the reduction
of costs of living that grows rapidly). After all, seeing that
the neglecting of goals which I have set in my manifesto from
item #D1 will gradually persuade voters to decisively vote for
me in the elections, should cause that decision-makers acting
in my constituency should be cautious in moves that are
opposite to the goals that I have set myself - means also
opposite to criteria of morality. In other words, if my
candidacy constantly may gain due to any unpopular acting
of decision-makers from the Hutt South, then this may
induce reluctance toward the introduction of any moves that
run against goals which I set for myself - for example, to the
increase of costs of living by raising rents, taxes, local fees,
costs of transport, etc. (At this point, however, I must admit,
that I am also well aware, that this particular goal of my acting,
is going to work only if I convince a significant number of votes
to incline towards voting for me - for this reasons, I do hope that
my goals manage to gain a noticeable support as soon as possible.)
4.
Development of the most effective methods of campaigning,
as well as the gathering of statistical data on the effectiveness
of my methods campaigning. By taking specific actions
in the election campaign, and by the subsequent scientific
analysis of the election results, I hope to develop the
most effective methods of campaigning - which can be
used by candidates practicing the philosophy of totalizm.
Part #F:
Now is the turn to introduce myself to potential
voters viewing this web page (with special emphasis
on those my qualities that will serve as assets
if they start to benefit parliament debates - i.e. such
as my creative nature, diligence, lateral thinking,
the skill of overcoming or omitting obstacles, etc.):
#F1.
Although I provided my name already in the introduction
to this web page, I know that just name is NOT enough to
decide whether to vote for me:
In this "part #F" of the web page, I am going to
try to introduce myself a bit more precisely than
I did it in the introduction to this web page. For
this purpose, I provide links to web pages and
publications in which my life is described, I
summarize my education and life achievements,
and I explain why and how New Zealand may
benefit if I am elected to the parliament.
(a)
(b)
Fig. #F1. Here is me, Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
captured in two opposite periods of my
life. I am standing to this elections as an
"Independent" candidate, i.e. the candidate
who does NOT belong to any political party.
Thus, I am NOT bound by the "party discipline"
to speak, vote and to do only whatever the
party tells me to do and what later is judged
by the leader of the party. Therefore, in case
of being elected I would become the true
representative of my voters. This is because
I could afford to advocate for everything that
is right and meets the moral criteria, is good
for the country and people, and the doing of
it is requested by the majority of my voters.
So my position in every matter would NOT be
dictated by concerns of the party, that whatever
I intend to do, say, or support with my vote, is
either e.g. too sensitive, too politically incorrect,
too unpopular amongst important or noisy
people, or it runs against either the party policy
or against views of the party leader. In addition,
if I was elected to NZ parliament, then I would
also become this proverbial "new broom that
sweeps well".
Fig. #F1a (top):
Here is how I looked like soon after my emigration
to New Zealand. The above my photograph is widely
circulated in internet.
Fig. #F1b (down):
Here is how I look like today. This image presents
my newest photograph of the passport type, taken
on 10th February 2015.
* * *
My profession and hobby is research, science and philosophy.
Thus I am a person accustomed to finding rules
and order, wherever other people see only random
events and chaos. My education is in Mechanical
Engineering. I also have the degree of a Doctor
of Technical Sciences. My doctorate was
defended from the border between Engineering
and Computer Sciences. Therefore, when I lectured
and carried research at 10 different tertiary educational
institutions from 5 countries of the world, in years 1970
to 2005, and then also in 2007, I professionally lectured
not only Mechanical Engineering, but also Computer
Sciences and Information Technology. In my professional
life I lectured (and thus also I mastered) around 100
different technically oriented subjects. Thus, the number
of these subjects would suffice to create a small Polytechnic
in New Zealand. In Mechanical Engineering I lectured at
the Technical University of Wrocław (Poland), at the University
of Canterbury in Christchurch (New Zealand), at the Universiti
Malaya in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), and at the Universiti
Malaysia Sarawak in Kuching (the Tropical Island
of Borneo). In turn Computer Sciences in the specialisation
of Programming, Software Engineering, Web Technology
and Information Processing (using the Web Technology),
I lectured at the Southland Polytechnic in Invercargill
(New Zealand), at the University of Otago in Dunedin
(New Zealand), at the Eastern Mediterranean University
in Famagusta (Northern Cyprus), and at the Ajou
University in Suvon (South Korea). In
both my disciplines, i.e. in the Mechanical Engineering
as well as in the Computer Sciences, I advanced up to
the professional level of an university Professor -
i.e. I was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the
Universiti Malaya and at the Universiti Malaysia Sarawak,
while I was a Professor of Computer Sciences at the
Eastern Mediterranean University and at the Ajou University.
In Poland I also worked as a scientific adviser in two huge
factories, the first of which produced computers, while the
second one - trucks and buses.
Since formerly in Poland every male passed through
a compulsory military service, a part of my life experience
is gathered in the Polish army as an officer (sub-lieutenant)
of sappers. So I have experience in working under pressure
and in making vital decisions in situations where typical
civilians are panicking and loose their rational thinking.
This ability could prove to be important, for example when
NZ is affected by a cataclysm described in items #G2 and
#K1 of this web page (e.g. epidemic of Ebola, earthquake,
tsunami, hunger, collapse of law and order, etc.).
My hobby research, carried out until today in
my private time and on my private cost, amongst
others, includes development of the
new, moral, peaceful, constructive, and uplifting
philosophy of totalizm
(i.e. the one spelled through "z" - to distinguish
it from the reactive and backward
"totalitarianism", sometimes because
of laziness also wrongly called "totalism",
but spelled with "s"). My totalizm is based
on the operation of moral field, moral
laws, moral energy, and karma. Moreover,
totalizm managed to formally prove the
existence of God.
For more details about my life, research, and
work, it is worth to have a look at mu autobiography,
in full version described on the web page
about me (i.e. Dr Jan Pajak),
while briefly summarised on the web page
Dr Jan Pajak: autographical summary - short version
and even shorter outlined in item #A2 from the web page about
secular and scientific view of God,
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2".
Many details regarding my numerous inventions and discoveries
can also be found in subsection W4 from volume 18 of my newest
monograph [1/5] -
free copies of which are available, amongst
others, also via this web page.
#F2.
The character shaping story of my life:
In the above caption under "Fig. #F1" I provided
links to my fairly extensive autobiographical
web pages and publications. However, to NOT
force the reader to seek and review these web
pages, below I summarize what is most
important regarding my life.
And so, I come from a very poor family of a Polish
labourer-peasant living in the village close to the
Silesian town Milicz
and most frequently called
Wszewilki
(this village is also known under several other names, e.g.
Stawczyk).
My father with a great difficulty earned bread for
our large family by simultaneously working in
three different capacities, namely at a full employment
as a mechanic in the nearby municipal waterworks,
while after hours by maintaining a miniature 3-hectare
farm and working as a "handyman" who helps
all people around by repairing their technical
equipment and by doing other tasks that required "know-how".
In many of these tasks my hardworking mother
assisted the father. Having such parents, from
childhood I am used to hard work and to exploration
of principles involved in work of various mechanisms
and machines.
My life was actually a long way uphill, and in addition
when the winds blew straight in my eyes. So I am
used to the shortcomings and difficulties in life,
and to hard earning for myself everything that is
important in life. To this day I have a habit of a
modest life, morally correct actions, and personal
earning of whatever is necessary for living,
but dispensing whatever I would just like to have.
I emigrated to New Zealand in 1982. At that time
New Zealand was a kind of "paradise on earth" -
which is already described in item #A1 of this web
page. After arriving in the country, with a joy I also
noticed, that it is populated exclusively
by immigrants and by their descendants. Although
some of these immigrants arrived here much earlier
than I did, sometimes by a number of centuries, still
according to the most recent census a quarter of all
people currently inhabiting New Zealand was born
overseas - see the article [1#F2] "Quarter
of all Kiwis are foreigh born", from page A23 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 16, 2014). Even
the local Maoris actually were also immigrants -
who came to New Zealand in canoes only around
12th century AD. So I felt among all of these
immigrants like in my own family and my own home.
#F3.
My demanding and comprehensive education:
I suspect that in the entire New Zealand there
is NO another person who has gone through
as "demanding" and as "hardening character"
kind of education as mine. Features of that
my education are described in item #E1 (and
in other parts) of a separate web page named
rok_uk.htm.
However, to NOT force the reader to browse
that web page, I summarize here the most
important features of it. And so, the "Polish
model" of education which I finished was
characterized by focussing on the
"investment in the best",
while "sifting
off the least capable and most lazy" -
means a principle the adaptation and long-term
implementation of which by e.g. the
South Korea,
from the third-world country turned it in today's
world power. For example, to get to the university,
I had to pass the entry exam in the situation when
there were more than 10 candidates for each study
sit. But this number 10 does NOT mean at all, that
in order to be accepted by the university it sufficed
to be academically better than 10 other candidates.
After all, exams were NOT conducted in small groups
of over 10 candidates each, so that later a single
candidate could be accepted from each group.
In reality all over 4000 candidates were examined
at the same time, then to the university were accepted
only around 360 best amongst them. Thus, in order
to get to the university, it was necessary to be
academically better than around 4000 of other candidates.
In addition, considering the later eliminations,
the university accepted almost four times more
students than were its quota received from the
government, with the explicitly communicated
to students intention, that the whole surplus of
students will be removed from the university during
the studies. (Half of those less capable students
designated for removal was planned for sifting
out already during exams in the first year of study -
and therefore has been removed from the university
over the next few months. Rest of the excess was
eliminated during the other parts of 6-year long
studies.) In the result, on my Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering, studies started around 360 students,
while graduated together with me from the University
only 106 of them. At that time the studying lasted
in Poland for six years - that is, as much as at the
same time was typically required in New Zealand
to both, graduate from a university, and to prepare
and defend a doctorate. But in my case the gaining
of education took 10 years, because in addition to
the studies, over the next four years I developed
and defended my doctorate in Computer Aided
Design of Machine Tools - which multidisciplinary
doctorate significantly helped me later in the
alternating my professional work between two
disciplines, namely between Mechanical
Engineering and Computer Sciences.
Because of such tough requirements and characteristics
of education that I completed, and due to conjunction
of such education with upbringing in the home where
the father is a "handyman" repairing every possible
technical equipment, white the mother is a modest
mathematical genius counting as fast as today's
computers, I suspect that there is NO another
scientist in New Zealand who could be proud
of finishing as difficult and as teaching kind
of education, as I had the honour to be
blessed with.
#F4.
My path through life which shaped in me the habit
of unconventional (lateral) and creative thinking:
God works in mysterious ways. In my case,
onto the path that led me to everything I have
achieved in my life, God directed me in 1972
with the use of ...
common flu.
Namely, I was overtaken by a nasty flu and was
bedridden. But immediately after my sick leave
certificate was to end up, I had to give a difficult
lecture on the propelling devices. But at home I
had NO textbooks, thus while lying sick I could NOT
prepare myself for this lecture. So I started to think
about what topic I could present to my students,
so that it could be prepared from memory while
lying in bed. I decided that it could be a classification
of propulsion systems. When I was planning it in
my thoughts, I noticed with a shock that propelling
drives which people already developed on Earth
can be arranged in a table of a kind very similar to
the famous "Periodic Table of Chemical Elements".
What is even more interesting, this table is also
clearly indicating what will be next propelling devices
which the humanity will build in the near future.
That my table invented (or discovered) that day
I named later the
"Periodic Table for Earth's Propulsion Systems" -
its description and presentation is provided in
item #B1 from my web page named
propulsion.htm.
After its fine tuning and publication, this table turned
out to be the beginning of the road, or like a "thread
of Ariadna", designated for me by God, which led me
to everything that I achieved until today.
The first completely new kind of propulsion system,
which the future building on Earth already around
the year 2036 was foretold by my "Periodic Table for
Earth's Propulsion Systems", was an interstellar
spaceship speeding through space at speeds close
to the speed of light. Later this starship I named the
Magnocraft.
Detailed descriptions of it I published already in
1980. In 1983 I invented (then I also published)
the energy-storing device that will propel my
Magnocrafts - that means I invented the so-called
Oscillatory Chamber.
When the television and newspapers popularized
in Poland the appearance and descriptions of my
Magnocraft, numerous people started to contact me,
who claimed that they already had seen my Magnocrafts
in the flights - only that they called them UFOs.
So I started to objectively research these their
claims, in the result of which already in 1981
I published a formal scientific proof that
UFOs exist objectively and are already operational Magnocrafts.
Furthermore, at the time when I emigrated to New Zealand,
the population of my new country was still recovering
from the shock of filming a UFO above the town of
Kaikoura. This Kaikoura UFO accompanied an aircraft
flying to Christchurch with an Australian film crew on
board. The UFO was filmed as it repeatedly encircled the
airplane in close proximity from all possible sides and
when it flew close above and below the aircraft. Flights
of this UFO were documented on several hours long film
recorded in the presence of several reliable witnesses.
The authenticity of the Kaikoura UFO documented
on this film has NOT been undermined to this day -
in spite that an entire generation of so-called "sceptics"
did everything in their power to devalue the documentary
significance of this film. In addition to this, soon after my
arrival in NZ, I found a huge crater formed near the
township of Tapanui,
where a stack of 7 such UFO vehicles type K6 exploded on
19 June 1178 AD. Unfortunately, after emigrating to New
Zealand, I also discovered that it lacks on both, the traditions
of "openness to new ideas" and on the tradition of "institutional
implementation of new inventions", to be able to carry out
openly in it my kind of research or to implement my inventions.
(I do hope, that my possible work as a Member of Parliament -
if I am elected, will change this situation and that New
Zealand will begin to open to inventors the publicly available
so-called "inventors' workshops" which are described in item
#D1 above on this web page.) So in the face of overt resistance
and fierce criticism of the topic of my research, and after
experiencing even a removal from the job at the
Otago University for the discovery, research and publishing descriptions of the Tapanui Crater,
I was forced to "go underground" with my research.
Already as a result of such "carried out underground" -
as I call them "my hobby research", in 1985
I developed my groundbreaking scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity (CDG).
In turn, on basis on this theory I later developed a series
of completely new ideas, namely a new
philosophy of totalizm,
a brand new and competitive to the official
science kind of science which I named the
totaliztic science -
which is described in items #C1 to
#C6 from my web page named
telekinetics.htm,
as well as a formal scientific proof for the actual
existence of God.
It is due to the development of this formal proof
for the existence of God, that now
I know for sure that God exists, instead of just
believing in the existence of God.
As we know, knowledge is better than faith,
because "one can
always stop believing, but one NEVER ceases
to know". Just such a replacement
of our beliefs by knowledge is foretold in the Bible -
e.g. see [1#F4] verse 4:13 from the
"Letter to Ephesians", which can be interpreted,
that the final situation which we all are to accomplish,
is when our child-like belief in God, which is
changeable and tossed around by blows of science,
is replaced by the mature knowledge of God.
However, in my personal opinion, the most important
discoveries and inventions that directly resulted from my
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and from my
Periodic Table of Earth's Propulsion Systems,
were my findings relating to the work of time. Namely,
soon after the development of my
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
I discovered that people actually live in artificially
pre-programmed by God, the so-called
"reversible software time".
That artificial time can be shifted back - thus allowing,
among others, the building by people of the
time vehicles
of my invention. With the help of these "time vehicles"
people can achieve immortality through repetitive shifting
back in time to years of their youth each time when they
reach an old age. In addition, the passage of this artificial
software time in which people live has a "jumping" nature
(i.e. is "discrete"), means is NOT "continuous" - as still mistakenly
tells us the official science about time. The actual "jumping"
nature of this artificial software time everyone can see visually
with the help of a simple experiment described in items
#D1 and #D2 from my web page named
immortality.htm.
There is also one of my discoveries about the work
of time, which I should describe here, because it also
justifies my request for prayers from items #B1 and
#M3 of this web page. In addition, the learning about
that my discovery might also be extremely beneficial
for people who feel intuitively that God exists, but the
rational acceptance of the existence of God hinder
in them the claims of the official science, that the
age of the rocks and celestial bodies dating back
millions of years, allegedly denies the truth of claims of the
Bible,
that God created people only around 6,000 years ago.
Namely, I discovered also that the whole "inanimate
matter", means all elements, minerals, rocks, fossils
(such as bones of dinosaurs or coal), etc., are ageing
according to a flow of different time than that of human
artificial one, in which different time lives only our
God, and which in my publications is called the
"irreversible absolute
time of the universe" - for descriptions
of it see e.g. the introduction and item #G4 from
my web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm.
This natural time of the universe, elapses smoothly
and is much faster than our jumping human time.
The rate of its elapse nobody has measured so far, but in
the Bible is provided the information that gives us a clue
how fast this natural time flows - see verse 3:8 of the
"2 Peter the Apostle", or see verse 90:4 from the
biblical "Book of Psalms". According to these biblical
clues, this natural time of the universe, out of all living
beings in which lives only our God, elapses around
365,000 times faster than the speed of elapse of that
another time in which we humans age. Thus, for
example, if the reader exactly remembers the appearance
of some rocks, which he or she visits again later
after at least three years of our human time, in the
meantime this rock gets old and erodes by more
than a million human years - which in the case of
some rocks is to generate such changes in their
shape and appearance, that the reader should
notice with the naked eye. That my discovery
about 365 thousand-fold difference in the rate
of passage of the time, in which ages the inanimate
matter, in comparison to the time in which the
people age, explains why dating of the age of rocks
and planets gives outcomes measured in millions
of years, while God created all our physical world
only about 6,000 years ago. It also explains why
the drawings on the stone walls of caves date back
to tens of thousands of years, although these drawing
were drawn by people created by God NOT earlier
than 6000 years ago. More information on the
work of both types of time described here, the
reader will find, among others, in the introduction
and in items #C4.1, #C4, #C3 and #A1 from my web page named
immortality.htm.
My supposed "hobby" scientific achievements that
I accomplished "underground" at my own expense,
do NOT end on whatever I described above. But
there is no need for all of them to be listed here.
After all, they are presented in detail in my publications
and on my web pages. The only thing that is worth
emphasizing here, is that they document a whole
range of my personal attributes, that in case if you
choose me as a Member of Parliament, would prove
to be immensely beneficial in the debates of that
parliament - i.e. traits of character such as my high
technical expertise, creative mind, unconventional
(lateral) way of thinking, analyzing everything that
I do from the point of view of the fulfilment of moral
criteria, etc.
Of course, from the research and inventions accomplished
"underground" and at my own expense, it is impossible
to survive - especially if one is a poor immigrant who
came to New Zealand with a total of about $30 in his
pocket. Therefore, in order to survive, regardless of
these "hobby" research, I also worked as a lecturer
at numerous universities. My proficiency in two different
disciplines, namely in Mechanical Engineering and
in Computer Sciences, has allowed me to achieve
in both of them the professional level of a university
professor. In turn, as the former professor from
several different universities, I also acquired various
personal characteristics that probably would prove
to be highly beneficial in adding further professionalism
to parliamentary debates.
(a)
(b)
Fig. #F2ab: Here is the appearance of
the starship of my invention which I named
the "Magnocraft". A brief description of this
interstellar spaceship is provided on the web page
magnocraft.htm.
In turn a detailed description of it, is contained in volume 3 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
According to numerous hints that I described
in item #H1.1 from my web page named
prophecies.htm,
this starship will be build around the year 2036
by the present South Korea. After its completion,
Korea in just a single day will advance to the status
of the world's leader.
Fig. #F2a (top):
The appearance of a single Magnocraft of the
smallest type named K3 (shown in a side view).
This smallest Magnocraft is just the size of a car.
Two such starships type K3, magnetically coupled
base-to-base into a spherical flying complex and
surrounded by the spinning cloud of ionised air,
were filmed in flight on 31 December 1979 over
the township of Kaikoura in New Zealand. The
authenticity of that "Kaikoura UFO" was never
abolished - although numerous so-called "sceptics"
did all in their power to question it. The appearance
and design of such spherical flying complex of two
starships type K3 is explained in
"Fig. #C2c"
from the web page
ufo_proof.htm.
In turn a single frame from the "Kaikoura UFO" film
is shown as
"Fig. P23"
from volume 15 of my free
monograph [1/5].
Fig. #F2b (down):
The appearance of a cigar-shaped stack of 7
Magnocraft of the middle-sized type named K6.
Here 7 single vehicles are stacked one on top of
the other like we do this with saucers in a kitchen.
It is a stack like this one that in 1178 AD exploded
near the township of Tapanui in New Zealand
causing an extensive damage discussed in more
details on the web page named
tapanui.htm,
while extensively described in my
monograph [5/3].
For example, the fallouts from this Tapanui explosion
until today cause the mysterious illness called
“Tapanui flu”. It is also responsible for mysterious
melted rocks locally called “china stones”, for the
extinction of Moa super-birds, and for the “gold fleece”
that until around 1840 still covered thickly the
surface of the ground in Otago.
#F5.
My continuous efforts of improving the quality of
life for all people - e.g. prospects of utilising the
"moral energy" (the existence of which I discovered),
for healing mental depression, for prevention of
suicides, for increasing the feeling of happiness
in people, for accomplishing nirvana, etc.:
Motto:
"The real progress does NOT depend on wearing old ideas in new clothing,
but on the courage of implementing new ideas for solving old problems."
If someone analyses outcomes of my research
and efforts, then is to discover, that everything
that I do in fact is aimed at improvement of the
quality of life, happiness and prosperity of all
people. (Although as a scientist I do NOT hide,
that there is NO such a new invention or discovery,
which immoral people would NOT be able
to turn into a tool of destruction or persecution.)
So I do NOT work secretly on some weapons which
would annihilate the majority of humans. I do NOT
try to create computer viruses which would destroy
the economy of entire countries. I do NOT invent
new illnesses or poisons. Etc., etc. Instead, I
intensely analyse how each invention or discovery
that I accomplished, could be utilised for the good
of all people.
In order to provide here an example, how some amongst
my discoveries could work for the good of all people,
I am describing in this item the potential and prospects
which e.g. for healing mental depression, or for prevention
of suicides, may introduce my discovery of so-called
"moral energy"
described, amongst others, in item #D2 of the web page
totalizm.htm,
while on this web page briefly mentioned e.g. in item
#I1. This "moral energy"
is a kind of equivalent to the "potential energy" known
to us from physics - only that instead of being generated
physically through the use of force for overcoming the
resistance of e.g. invisible "gravity field", this moral energy
is generated mentally (in our counter-bodies) through
putting a mental effort into overcoming with our intellect
the another, equally invisible like gravity, primary field which my
Concept of Dipolar Gravity and the
philosophy of totalizm
call the "moral field". Similarly like the moral
energy, also the moral field has been further explained
e.g. in items #I1 and #J1, as well as in "Fig. #I1" from
this web page. To increase its understanding, in there
was used a different than here viewpoint for explanations.
While reading those descriptions please note also, that
in contrast to gravity - which acts only on a single
(physical) component of ourselves, i.e. on our masses
(thus generating our weight), the moral field exerts
a pressure at so many as three components of our mental
actions and decisions, i.e. at our willingness (intellectual
anti-laziness) to make creative intellectual searches (X),
at our ability to generate positive feelings in other people
(Y), and at our mental motivation to contribute a specific
physical effort into a given activity (Z). On "Fig #I1" these
three components of the moral field has been marked as
the three coordinate axes X, Y and Z of our mental processes.
Furthermore, while the gravitation acts approximately the
same within periods of time perceptible to human senses,
the moral field instantly displays
an opposite reaction to its long-term reaction - namely in
a short-term (means instantly - i.e. in the duration which
extends only for the time while a given our action lasts)
the moral field always generates events which make for
us difficult the completion of morally correct actions, while
which make easier to carry out any immoral actions, however,
in a long term (i.e. after elapsing a few years) the moral field
starts to generate events which are logically linked to a given
our previous acting, but which consequences are for us opposite
to consequences of short-term events. Examples
of short-term events generated during a reaction of the moral
field at my morally correct acting, are described in item #N3
from this web page.
The moral energy is generated always when
with our mental effort we overcome in ourselves any
amongst these three components of the moral field
(which on "Fig. #I1" are marked with symbols X, Y
and Z), that exerts a pressure onto our mind to stop
us from doing something, the doing of which we just
started or the doing of which we just contemplate, and
that fulfils criteria of a "morally correct activity", means
that is lifting us "uphill" in this similar to gravity invisible
"moral field". In turn, the moral energy is dispersed
from us when we either do nothing while indulging in pleasures
of idling, or when we give up to invisible pressure of this
"moral field" and do something that is immoral (though
typically that is the easiest to do, and hence that gives us
a pleasure), means that pushes us down in this invisible
moral field. This is just because of the existence of this
invisible "moral field", that doing anything that is morally
correct, e.g. telling a full truth, or giving a "real
favour" to other people, requires overcoming in
our minds the resistance of this moral field and
putting into our doing a significant effort similar
to the effort of climbing uphill in the invisible gravity
field. It is also because of the resistance of this moral
field, that in present times so many people avoid
doing anything that fulfils criteria of "morally correct
acting" - after all, the work of moral field makes it
to be laborious and typically unpleasant. In turn,
this common avoidance of doing "morally correct
acting" causes, that the level of moral energy falls
down rapidly in the majority of present people, thus
becomes a major cause for the present "epidemics"
of depression and other mental illnesses, and also
a major cause for the present "epidemics" of suicides.
The moral energy is equally necessary for our mental
health and life, as oxygen is needed for our physical
health and life. For example, if the level of moral energy
falls in someone below a certain threshold value, then
such a person dies in a self-destructive manner, for
example by committing a suicide. In turn, the generation
(boosting the level) of the moral energy in us, increases
our feeling of happiness and disperses negative
thoughts - as this is explained more comprehensively
on a number of my web pages, e.g. in item #D9 from
the web page named
totalizm.htm,
in items #B1 and #C2 from the web page named
nirvana.htm,
or in items #D4 and #E1 from my web page named
parasitism.htm.
Because of such a work of moral energy as an
increaser of the feeling of happiness and satisfaction
from life, the learning by the philosophy of totalizm
how to generate moral energy in us, creates a
potential for the development of a simple method
for healing mental depression, for prevention of
suicides, etc. - means for our defence against all
these kinds of ills which now represent an increasingly
difficult social problem NOT only in New Zealand.
After all, so serene until recently New Zealand, now
gradually turns out itself into the country of rampaging
mental depression and suicides. This in turn is a sign
of a clear moral, social and ideological bankruptcy,
and a proof of erroneousness of relevant claims
of the official human science. For example, in
[1#F5] television news broadcasted
in NZ at 6:20 pm in channel TV1 on 6 April
2014, was stated that amongst NZ farmers
suicides represent now the third greatest
cause of deaths - after illnesses and after the
old age. Reasons for such a development of
situation is many, e.g. the increasingly more
difficult life as adult in present New Zealand
(the fact which I already explained e.g. in items
#A2 and #D1 from this web page), combined
with the escalation in "overprotective" way
of upbringing children implemented by New
Zealand hyper-cautious females - e.g. see the
article [2#F5] "Parents too scared to
let kids ride bikes", from page A2 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 16, 2014), or
see that "anti-smacking law" discussed previously
on this web page. As a result, when a child of
such "overprotected" upbringing reaches
adulthood and experiences the harsh treatments
of real life, then he or she is NOT able to withstand
it and either falls in depression or commits a suicide.
(Perhaps it would be worth that New Zealand
mothers learned also about various beneficial
outcomes of the method of upbringing people
by God, which under the name
"principle of reversals"
is described in item #F3 from the web page
wszewilki_uk.htm.)
I already put a lot of effort and research in attempts
to develop a method based on moral energy, for
our defence from depression-related problems.
Already a long time ago I described such a
method in my publications - e.g. see item
#D1 on the web page named
nirvana.htm,
or even better see subsection JE9 from
volume 8 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
In the version the work of which I tested
on myself, this method boils down to the
intense increase (rebuilding)
in ourselves the required level of moral energy
through the completion of such kinds of heavy
physical labour, about which principles of the
"totaliztic science" allowed me to establish that
it generates large amounts of moral energy.
In other words, this method increases in humans
the sense of personal happiness, satisfaction and
desire to live, by teaching people how they are to
perform very specific types of highly moral works
of physical nature, illustrated in part (a) from
"Fig. #I1", which "moral works" increase in them
fast the level of moral energy necessary for their
happiness. Unfortunately, so far NO official support
was given to this method, although I received private
emails in which other people claimed that the following
of my method boosted their moral energy up to the level of
totaliztic nirvana.
However, my financial constrains, lack of access
to research facilities, lack of conditions for the
development of an instrument which would
measure the level of someone's moral energy,
official disapproval of my research, etc., cause
that so-far I am unable to objectively and scientifically
confirm or verify the work of this method on
people other than myself. This is pity. After all,
when for some ideological reasons the policy
makers of official science turn their backs to the truths
which my "hobby" research and publications are
trying to disclose to people, in the meantime thousands
of sons, daughters, husbands, wives, mothers and
fathers fall for depression or commit suicides. But,
while ignoring my method of treating depression
and preventing suicides, simultaneously those policy
makers of official science are NOT able to offer
to people any other method, that would be really
effective - not mentioning the requiring from it to
be more effective than the described here method
based on moral energy, and thus which official method
could effectively help those countless victims of the
deficiency of moral energy, and to restore these victims
to their relatives who love them and need them in own
lives. Thus, the situation with my method for generating
moral energy to prevent depressions and suicides,
begins to copy the situation with the ancient
Zhang Heng Seismograph,
which could save thousands of lives from the deaths
in earthquakes, but which no-one wants to build
because its principle of operation is based on the use of
telepathic waves,
for the remote detection of incoming earthquakes,
the existence of which waves
for some ideological reasons is stubbornly denied
by the policy makers of the present official human
science. So it appears, that in order to stop the
current pushing of mankind toward the abyss by already
ideologically corrupted
the official science to-date, there is NO other option,
than the official establishment of yet another science
(competitive to the current one), which under the name
of the "new totaliztic science"
is described more comprehensively in items #C1 to
#C6 from the web page named
telekinetics.htm.
Part #G:
What benefits voters of my electorate "Hutt South",
as well as all people of New Zealand, would obtain
through voting in the election for my candidacy:
#G1.
God is exceptionally fair - to each person He gives NOT
only certain imperfections, but also various unique talents:
God is always extremely fair. Hence, any
shortcomings in one area, always are rewarded
with additional gifts in another area - as a drastic,
although the illustrative example of this, consider
blind people - whom God always gives excellent
hearing and nose, or consider the fate of desert
countries - to which God have given crude oil.
Therefore, the social life always benefits, if
everyone has the opportunity to contribute
to the society, whatever God has given to
him or to her in the most abundant manner.
On this web page, I just suggest to use for the
good of other people of those of my attributes,
in the formation of which God was for me the
most generous.
#G2.
New Zealand is NOT bypassed by cataclysms - however, the
question is whether our decision makers have shown that they
are suitably prepared to deal properly with a large-scale cataclysm?
If one watches television news, then he or she
starts to be shocked by the number of social
problems, unrests, revolutions, changes of
governments and political systems, etc., that are
taking place in today's world. New Zealanders typically
watch all this with a philosophical complacency.
After all, for now they still have full stomachs,
and the law and order still prevail in their country.
However, I have seen and experienced in Poland
an illustration, how dramatically and suddenly
the situation may change. After all, to start such
a change it just suffices that food disappears
from the shop shelves, and that the government
will be forced to take drastic actions - as long
ago has been foretold in an old Polish prophecy
described in item #H3 from the web page named
prophecies.htm.
And just such a change is NOT far from New Zealand,
i.e. distant by only a single big cataclysm of a national
level, such as for example a sharper than usual winter
or drought, which would decimate the food supply.
But as we see it around, natural disasters, droughts,
floods, devastating winters, etc., are becoming increasingly
frequent phenomena.
A cataclysm fatal for New Zealand can also arrive
from outside. But it does NOT need to be a killer
illness (e.g. the African Ebola or Asian bird flu). It
simply can be an outcome of anything that disturbs
the order and economic stability. An example can
be here almost ready to emerge the future effects
of a large-scale money printing, about which it is
known that it is going on in the economically most
crucial country already for many years - see the
Polish-language article from the web page
prisonplanet.pl/ekonomia/ entitled
nie_tylko_rosja_ucieka_od,p2070308788.
After all, such large-scale money printing displays all
attributes of the "immoral decision and implementation"
described in item #J1 from this web page. For example,
in a short-term it is easy, free of effort, it gains instant
appeal and support, and it provides instant benefits.
Thus, according to the work of the moral field, in its
long-term outcomes it must bring about the contradiction
of itself, means the financial crash. Actually the history
confirms for certain, that every previous case of large-scale
money printing inevitably ended up with the destructive
financial crash. A good example for it could be the fate
of the Minister of Finance of France named
John Law -
whose massive printing of money in years 1716 to 1720
caused a financial crash, and some time later became
one of the causes of the Great French Revolution. The
same happened in the Republic of Weimar (now Germany),
which in years 1918 to 1923 also been printing money on
a massive scale, causing a financial crash and subsequent
Hitler's rise to power - thus, consequently, also the 2nd
World's War. In fact, first signs of the just started
arrival of a destructive world-wide financial crash to
the present-day humanity, started to be noticed by
even the more insightful bankers - for an example
see the article [1#G2] entitled "New global
crash looming: bank boss", from page B12 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Monday, August 11, 2014).
Another example of a cataclysm that may arrive
to New Zealand from the outside, are fundamental
changes to the technology of food production which
are coming soon - which kind of changes is described
in the article [2#G2] entitled "Milk made
in laboratories to hit shelves", from page A1 of the
New Zealand newspaper named
The Dominion Post Weekend
(the issue dated on Saturday-Sunday, July 12-13,
2014). This article describes plans of American
company (with Indian connections - thus probably
infuenced by holy-cows) to use genetically modified
yeast for producing milk almost identical to cow's
milk. Already in 2016 it plans to undertake mass
production of such synthetic milk in a manner
very similar to the current production of beer.
This milk becomes so cheap, that it will lead to
bankruptcy all over the world of these farmers,
who graze milk producing cows and sell dairy
products. But in New Zealand the milk production
is the basis for the economy of the country - in
2016 it plans to bring about $ 17 billions of income.
Apart from grazing animals, New Zealand has NO
other industry that would provide the basis for the
economy. After all, it does NOT try to neutralize
effects of the moral mechanisms of the kind of
the "curse of inventors" or
"inventive impotency"
described, among others, in item #N2 from this
web page, which persecute and destroy its inventors
and discoverers. In turn the prevalence of these
mechanisms in NZ means, that it is doomed
to live only from the ancient technologies, such
as the production of milk, meat, wool, skins, etc.
There is also insufficient amount of lowland plains
in NZ, where the grazing animals could be replaced,
for example, by the growing of cereals or sugar
plants. So when products supplied from animals
to humans since ancient times, such as milk, meat,
wool, leather, etc., are to be replaced by their much
better synthetic counterparts, the entire NZ economy
collapses. This in turn will initiate economic cataclysm
on the scale which NZ never anticipated and for the
dealing with which is NOT prepared at all.
So the question which we should be asking is whether
expertise represented by the current decision-makers
of New Zealand will allow it to manage the situation
after the arrival of any large-scale cataclysm? A partial
answer to this question gives the situation which still
prevails in Christchurch - although it has elapsed more
than 3 years from the time when Christchurch was destroyed by the
earthquake of 2011.
One of reasons: the decision-making processes typically
ignores new ideas of people, who think in a different
way from the usual - which kind of (lateral) thinking is
my specialty. So in my opinion, actually New Zealand
would benefit if in the composition of the parliament
is included someone with so unconventional (lateral)
way of thinking, as mine. After all, NOT
in every life situation people who think differently
(laterally) are of a worse category, as they frequently
are able to make an unique contribution through
coming up with an idea, the inventing of which
these typically thinking people are almost never
able to come up.
#G3.
Other benefits that would create my joining the
group of members of the New Zealand parliament:
Here are my most important qualities that also
cause, that I would be able to contribute a lot
to parliament:
1.
I am an immigrant - so I do NOT carry an emotional
obligation to consider in other people anything other
than their actual merit and the real fruit of their actions.
I mean, because I did NOT graduate from the high
school, college, nor I served in the army with other
people who surround me, I am NOT connected with
them by any informal relationships or emotional
ties. Thus, in everything that I do I can be absolutely
objective and factual, and guided exclusively by
values that other people really represent. Such
objectiveness, in turn, can turn very important
for a country where existed situations when all
members of government were classmates from
the same school.
2.
I am a scientist with a high technical knowledge and
with a huge baggage of life experience. The
real life confirmed the usefulness of a number of
methods and principles that so far I scientifically
worked out. It is therefore a good chance that the
same methods and principles bear fruit if they
are used for the purpose of attaining goals stated
on this web page.
3.
As a former activist of Polish "Solidarity", I am
psychologically used to the idea of far-reaching
reforms - which New Zealand urgently needs.
In other words, I am used to idea of investing
efforts in implementing reforms that may lead to
the achievement of general goals which I try to
emphasize in my campaign, and which are listed
in item #D1 from this web page, i.e. I am ready
to consider even methods so unconventional,
as those described in item #D4 from this web
page.
Part #H:
General methods with the use of which I intend
to make my contribution to achievement of goals
and intentions described on this web page:
#H1.
The continuation of my research to date and
the simultaneous standing in election in 2014:
Progress must be earned in a laborious manner.
So in order to do so, in my spare time I am to continue
my research described in item #F4 of this web
page. In addition, for a number of reasons which
I explained on this web page, I decided to put
forward my candidacy to voting for parliament
in 2014. In the case of a success in this field,
I could try, along with other MPs, to which the
future and the good of New Zealand is at heart,
whether we can push through the parliament
some positive changes that are described
in item #D1 of this web page.
Part #I:
How it happened that I decided to stand for this election:
#I1.
"Good intentions" plus "bear's favour" equals
to the "life problems for a lot of people":
Motto:
"The hell is paved with 'good intentions'."
In Poland we have the idiom
"bear's favour".
It originates from the folk fable in which a huge and
a powerful bear had good intentions towards the man
with whom the bear was friendly. So when a fly sat
on the forehead of the man, the bear wanted to give
him a favour and to kill the fly. But when the bear hit
the fly with his paw, its blow was so powerful, that
it shattered the skull of the friend. So if we would define
the Polish folk expression "bear's favour", then we
would state something along the lines:
the "bear's favour" is an
activity carried out with good intentions of helping,
but without the required consensus of people being
helped, which activity, however, due to commitment
of the various mistakes or over-simplification of the
analysis of its actual consequences, in practice turns
out to be highly destructive for those to whom it supposed
to serve and help. Unfortunately, all
of us are only humans, while committing mistakes
is a human thing. Therefore, the art of living does
NOT depend on total avoidance of giving "bear's
favours", but on the skills of repairing such disservice
when we discover, that what we are doing turns
out to be undesirable - that is, depend on the ability
of changing "bear's favours" into
"true favours".
Unfortunately, in the real life, many people unintentionally
give to others just such a "bear's favour". As an
example, consider this "anti-smacking law"
described in item #B5.1 from the web page named
will.htm -
the "good intention" of which was to prevent the
abuse of children, but which actually deprived
decent parents of the right to discipline their
own children.
I scientifically researched why so many actions
of decision-makers and politicians turn out later
to be "bear's favours". As I determined, the main
reason is, that such actions are NOT checked
whether they meet all the criteria of being "moral".
It turns out that if something is NOT "moral" (in
the sense of the definition of "morality" provided
in item #B5 from my web page named
morals.htm),
then in the long-term effects it causes undesirable
so-called "side effects", which NOT only that eliminate,
but also exceed, the short-term beneficial consequences
of it. This is because only acting which meets
the criteria of being "moral" in the long-term consequences
does NOT introduce various undesirable side effects
that invalidate the short-term desirable effects of it.
Unfortunately, most people do NOT know about
these facts. After all, the direct link between
morality and side effects was revealed only
through the research of the new "totaliztic
science" carried out in compliance with the
philosophy of totalizm -
so still only a few people knows about this link.
In turn, people who do not know about results
of such research of totalizm, make a lot of
decisions that have NOT been verified whether
they meet the criteria of morality. Many of these
decisions were NOT consulted with people whom
later they affect, thus have a character of "forcing
happiness onto someone" accordingly to the
belief of many politicians and decision makers,
that "I know the best what they need to be happy".
The implementation of such decisions turns
out later to be a kind of "bear's favours".
So in order to indicate here what kinds of
checking with moral criteria is required in
all human actions, in the next "Part #J" I
summarised what such checking should
be all about.
Subsections JA4.1 and JA13 from volume 6 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
explain broadly reasons for which all decisions
and actions, that have NOT been confirmed as
meeting the criteria of morality, after completing
and elapsing a certain
time of return
turn out to trigger various unwanted "side effects" which
turn them into the "bear's favours". This explanation
reveals, that every human action (and every decision)
is a kind of three-dimensional process performed in
the human mind first, and only later being projected
to the physical world. On "Fig. #I1" this process
is illustrated as vector P. This process shows a kind of
"mirror similarities" to the three-dimensional process
of "physical work" that is already well described for us
by sciences of physics and mechanics. Namely, these
human actions and decisions that occur in our mind,
also are kinds of displacements Px, Py and Pz carried
out in three-dimensional force field formed by three
forces of environmental oppositions aligned perpendicularly
to each other (i.e. at 90 degree angles) - i.e. aligned similarly
to the set of three coordinate axes X, Y and Z in a three-dimensional
physical space. Onto these displacements Px, Py and Pz
taking place in our minds, act the following three kinds of
opposing forces of this three-dimensional force field, namely:
(X) forces F=ma formed by the so-called "moral field"
(i.e. external pressures and forces formed by our conscience,
by intellectually learned requirements of God given to us by
religions, by the content of the Bible, by the methods and effects
of God's actions, etc.), (Y) opposing forces and commands
of feelings and judgments of other people (i.e. human prejudices,
dislikes, habits, emotional needs of egos, etc.), and (Z)
opposing physical forces (i.e. resistances of our body, consequences
of fatigue, physical needs of the body, etc.). Out of these three forces
the most primary is the "moral field" (F=ma). In turn forces of feelings
(Y) and physical forces (Z) are secondary towards the "moral field"
and depend on it in many ways - some of which still require
researching. It is for that reason that we can state, that forces
of feelings and physical forces are "effects related" to the moral field.
For example, we already know, that actions Px which are "moral"
(means which run uphill of the axis X), in people who act morally
generate positive feelings Py (i.e. feelings which also run uphill
of the axis Y, as it is indicated in parts (a) and (c) from "Fig. #I1").
But in people who act immorally (e.g. in criminals) someone's
moral acting Px generates negative feelings -Py (i.e. feelings
which run downhill of the axis Y, as it is indicated in parts (c)
and (d) from "Fig. #I1"). Similarly we already know, that every
effective "good deed" (such as the one illustrated in part (a)
from "Fig. #I1) always requires contributing into it a significant
physical effort (e.g. lifting a load, pulling someone from water,
completing a work for someone, etc.). Of course,
every human action (or decision) P can be arbitrarily inclined
relatively to these three force coordinate axes X, Y and Z.
With such an inclining, the action (or decision) P itself becomes
the physical "action" which induces secondary "reactions"
of not only a moral, but also an emotional Py and physical Pz
character. These secondary "reactions" of the emotional
or physical kind, the source of which is the action (or
decision) P inclined at some angle to the emotional and
physical axes, after elapsing a specific
time of return
are manifested in our physical world just as the abovementioned
"side effects" Py and Pz of whatever has been
done or decided. For this reason, only the actions
and decisions that run exactly upward of every axis of the
coordinate system described here, do NOT induce reactions
in the form of unwanted "side effects". Therefore, in order to
carry out actions and make decisions that will NOT bring to
us punishments -Px for breaking "moral laws", that will NOT
stimulate later other people neither to the strong negative
feelings -Py, nor plague us with unpleasant physical
consequences -Pz, it is necessary to carry out routine
checking of each of our action and decision that it
actually fulfils the criteria of being moral, i.e. checking
whether it actually climbs exactly upward in the "moral field"
and also upward along the axis of feelings and physical work.
Only such actions that meet strict criteria of morality do NOT
turn out to be later kinds of the "bear's favour" described here.
In the above explanation I often use the name
"moral field".
Although this field is partially described in a number
of items of this web page (e.g. in items #D5, #F5,
#J2, #N2, and (2014/4/19) from #M2), to be sure
I explain precisely at this point what it actually is.
Well, the so-called "totaliztic science" (i.e. the
science described already in item #F4 of this
web page) discovered that people are constantly
subjected to two different kinds of invisible primary
fields with characteristics very similar to each other.
The first of these two fields, identified already relatively
long time ago by the official science, is the well known
to us "gravity field". It acts only on the "physical
masses" (e.g. on our bodies), and its action most
clearly we experience e.g. when we climb up the
stairs or along a slope. In contrast, the second of
these two primary fields has NOT yet been detected
by the official science, while the author of this web
page is the first scientist who discovered and described
it. The author named it the "moral field" - because
it creates force interactions with only "moral masses"
(i.e. with human minds). On the illustrations from
"Fig. #I1", this "moral field" is shown as a yellow
arrow exerting the force "F=ma". Its action also can be noticed
relatively clearly when it comes to doing something
that is morally correct, and thus that in the future will
bring many benefits "a" for a large number of people
"m" - for example, when we carry out actions described
on this web page. In such cases, the short-term reaction
of moral field typically manifests itself to us as something
that induces in us various intellectual resistances, threats,
discouragements, attitudes, etc., felt in our minds
as they discourage us to take such moral actions
and that we need to consciously overcome by yielding
a significant effort in the realization of our intentions.
(Notice, however, that the long-term work of the moral
field is always opposite to its short-term reaction.)
Examples of various short-term manifestations of the reaction of
"moral field", which so far have already revealed themselves
during the completion of my intentions described
on this web page, are reported below in item #N3.
If we tried to provide here a formal definition of the
moral field, then the field could be defined, for example,
as follows. "Moral field"
is a primary force-field very similar to gravity, which, however,
instead of the "physical masses" acts on the "moral masses"
(m) represented by our minds, with the force (F=ma),
which is proportional to the number of human minds
(m) that are affected by the consequences of a given
action, and proportional to the amount of the benefits
(a) of progress (or to the amount of suffering (-a) of a
degeneration) caused by this action.
But notice here, that although
the moral field is the more advanced relative of gravity field,
and e.g. is also a primary field, it displays several attributes
which make it different from gravity. For example,
the moral field (1) is superior in relationship to gravity,
(2) in its long-term consequences it acts oppositely
than in its short-term consequences, (3) it displays
a high intellegence on every of its actions, as well as
has several further differentiating attributes that are
described in item #H2 from the web page named
totalizm.htm.
It is also worth to emphasize here, that in order to
effectively educate people for "soldiers of God" (as
described in item #B1 from the web page
antichrist.htm),
God in his infinite wisdom so programmed work of the
"moral field", that everything that is "moral" in a short-term must
with a significant effort climb uphill of this field (i.e. in the direction
+Px, like it is indicated in parts (a) and (b) from "Fig. #I1").
In turn everything that is "immoral" slides down in this
field, in short-term generating for us some kind of pleasure
(i.e. slides down in the direction -Px, like it is indicated in
parts (c) and (d) from "Fig. #I1"). As a result, in the sense
of short-term (immediate) effects, the "moral field" F=ma
always immediately hinders every our activity which is
morally correct, while it immediately makes easy and
pleasant every our action that is "immoral". (Note that
such short-term effects of the moral field allow for a very
simple and quick identification of actions and decisions
that have the potential to turn "bear's favours" in the future.
Namely, if a given action or decision comes easily and/or
gives pleasure for us, in fact it means that in the future
it will probably be just a "bear's favour".) Fortunately
for the humanity, the "moral field" has also its long-term
operation, which is the multiplied reversal of its short-term
action. In this long-term operation, the moral field
abundantly rewards morally correct actions, and
severely punishes actions that have qualified
themselves as immoral.
So in order that any action (or decision) is NOT
turning out later to be a "bear's favour", before its
implementation we have the duty to verify whether
it meets the criteria of morality, means whether it
climbs possibly the most steeply up in this invisible
"moral field" - following along the so-called "line
of the highest intellectual resistance". Only such
action does NOT form later the "moral reactions"
in the form of various punishments served to us
due to actions of "moral laws". In turn making sure,
whether the action (or decision) is actually progressing
uphill in the "moral field", and along this required
"line of the highest intellectual resistance", is obtained
by analyzing whether it fulfils the already known to us
criteria of morality described in "part #J" of this web page.
Giving of "bear's favours" can be easily avoided in
practice, if only in our decisions and actions we
respect the three basic rules that should be included
in every human process and every decision. Because
the political decisions affect the largest number
of people, so it is extremely important that the
complying with these rules is automatically assigned
(and required) to every political decision - including
every decision of parliament. These rules impose
the following requirements:
(1)
After the initial decision, but before taking any action,
you need to consult carefully your intentions with
people who will be exposed to their consequences.
Although many democracies, including that of New Zealand,
makes broad gestures that supposedly uses pre-acting
consultation, but over time these consultations were
typically deviated due to the habit of their facilitation
through conducting them with the wrong people -
i.e. usually with local authorities and with institutions
which will later implement given decision, and hence
with which only negotiations of the final quality and
price should be carried out, NOT the type and nature
of the action. It is known that these local authorities
and institutions will later implement these actions and
decisions, means that their participants and representatives
will later distribute lucrative contracts or will be drawing
profits arising from such implementation. Thus, in their
business lies NOT to change anything, only because it
does NOT meet the criteria of morality and hence later
it turns to be a "bear's favour". Thus, such improperly
addressed consultation can be compared to the conduct
of a husband, who is going to buy a car for his wife,
but instead of the wife he consults for this purpose
a car dealer - of course, landing with the model which
is the most expensive, least comfortable, and the most
unwanted by his wife. (As a result of such a "bear's favour",
typically he is later punished by the adverse "side effects"
of his decision, throughout the entire period of ownership
of this car, and sometimes even through the rest of his life.)
(2)
If the people who will be exposed to the consequences of
the given action, in their majority begin to protest and urge
the abandonment of it, "do NOT force them to be happy",
but rather change your intentions into a different action
that will better serve these people. However, do NOT
proceed hastily with finding out what should replace the
unwanted action, but put a lot of thought into whatever you choose.
For this, you should start by examining what was the true
goal to be achieved by the original (abandoned) action,
then prepare a list of other possible actions that also can
accomplish the same, or very similar, goals.
(3)
From the list of possible actions that can accomplish
the true goals intended by you, select the one that best
meets the criteria of morality, then again repeat for it the
consultation process from the item (1) above.
How you should then check whether that action fulfils
the criteria of morality, I will indicate for you in more detail
in "part #J" of this web page. This process shall be repeated
until a vast majority of people affected by the intended
action is pleased to approve its completion. Note here that
although it is known in advance that in a large group of
people always some individuals are present who are to
protest against virtually everything, typically there is very
few such individuals - hence always can be found an action
(or a decision) so moral, that it will content a majority of
people that will be affected by its consequences. Only
after obtaining the approval of the vast majority of people
affected by it, you can start negotiations with contractors
who will implement them in real life. This is because
contractors will accept everything what is presented
to them, only that negotiated with them will require
the form, quality and price of their final product.
Politicians and decision makers are NOT the only
people, who in every their proceedings, the outcomes
of which are to affect other people, should comply
with the above rules. In fact, everyone of us has a
moral duty to work out for own use, and then systematically
deploy in the actions, a version of these rules.
Especially item (1) - i.e. the "pre-acting consultation",
and item (2) - i.e. the "change of unwanted actions
into moral and wanted actions that will be accepted
by the great majority of people affected by their consequences".
In other words, in whatever we do, we should:
avoid making "surprises" (surprises by
definition are immoral - unless they were proceeded
by a discrete checking of their recipients, whether
whatever is to be served to them is agreeable with
their wishes), consult everything we intend to do,
and be ready to make changes - if these are
suggested to us. Of course, such a procedure
of action goes against whatever the fuelled by "egos"
philosophy of parasitism
tells us vociferously that we should do on daily
basis - as an example consider numerous advertisements
and announcements of the type "make your loved one
a surprise and buy for her a diamond ring", or
"organize for him a surprise party". But we must
remember that these advertisements are developed
and disseminated by the companies and institutions
that in item (1) above are indicated as "inappropriate"
to consult with them our decisions. If we will consult
our plans with the right person, for example, with the
beloved one, then it may turn out, for example, that
instead of drowning our savings in a diamond ring,
she would rather prefer we purchase a table that we
need in a shared flat, while e.g. the consulting the person
for which is to be organized a surprise party may for
example reveal that this person has on that day an
urgent need to go to another town. So there is about
the time that we understand that whatever is
advertised noisily and imposes itself upon us, according
to the iron rule of morality always runs down in the
moral field - as such, in long-term consequences
it introduces more adverse "side effects" than
it brings short-term benefits. If we do NOT want
that such thing later turns out later a "bear's favour",
then it must be designed wisely and in consultation
with the majority of people who will be affected by it,
so that it runs "uphill", NOT "downhill", in the moral
field!
* * *
One amongst such "bear's favours" implemented accordingly
to the model of "making happy by force" and only after
consulting inappropriate people, was ubtil recently (i.e.
until 12 June 2014) developing in Petone in which I live.
It involved the proposal of an unfortunate project to build
a stadium in Petone. Potential problems and unhappiness
that the building of this stadium would place on shoulders
of almost all residents of the electorate "Hutt South", caused
just that after the discovery that there are NO normal ways
of transforming this "bear's favour" into a "true favour",
I decided to stand for elections in that electorate. If I
would become elected to parliament, then my first and
most important priority would be given to doing everything
in my power to change this project of the construction
of stadium in Petone, which does NOT fulfil the criteria
of morality, into any other construction project, which,
however, fulfils the criteria of morality - for example,
into the project of construction of "inventors' workshop"
described in items #D1 and #D5 of this web page. After all,
the construction of the stadium in Petone would have
the potential to ruin lives of most people affected by
this project. I believe, that if the creators of this project
have made the required analysis and determined what
will be the true impact of building this stadium, then
even them would be happy to exchange it for the
project of something else, e.g. the construction of
the abovementioned "inventors' workshop". After all,
no one intentionally wants
to place oneself and one's name in the memory of
people, and in God's registers, as a "villain" who
brought to other people a long strand of various
sufferings and troubles. Unfortunately,
in typical cases consequences of our actions
become clear only when it is too late to change the
project - because this project is already implemented
(which situation in New Zealand is best illustrated
by the government's project today called "Novopay" -
i.e. that is to calculate wages for teachers). So let
us now look at explanations why this stadium was so
big problem for Petone, while the construction of it
would be a "bear's favour" given to residents of this
township and to other people associated with this project.
(Note, however, what is written in item #I5 below.)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. #I1. Here are four drawings so pre-planned,
that they illustrate to the reader the short-term
action of "moral field" in four most common life
situations - as the mechanism of action of this
field onto people is explained to us by discoveries
of the so-called "Totaliztic Mechanics" described,
among others, in chapter JG from volume
8 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
In addition to the "moral field", these drawings
also illustrate the most important cases of "effects
related" to the work of "moral field", such as "feelings"
Py (and/or "karma" - which is a relative of feelings)
and "physical work" Pz. In addition, they also explain
the action of moral entities which depend on the
"moral field" - such as generating or dispersion
of "moral energy", performing "moral work" and
"moral good deeds", the action of "moral laws"
(especially the so-called "Boomerang Principle"),
etc. After all, for all of them the "moral field" is the
overriding factor, which typically governs them,
and from which they are typically dependent.
For example, only actions that run uphill in the
moral field belong to the category of "moral good
deeds" which are NOT penalized by the "moral
laws", and which under normal circumstances
shown in part (a) generate a lot of "moral energy".
Typically also a result of almost every "moral good
deed" is dependent on the positive orientation of
the "side effects" Py and Pz of work of moral field.
Thus, for example, good deeds require the completion
of specific physical work Pz (e.g. in a "good deed"
of helping an old lady to move some weights, or
in a good deed of digging garden for parents), and
the ensuring that outside observers had also positive
feelings towards a given action. (Unfortunately
these feelings Py of outsiders are subject to relatively
complex moral laws. For example, strong feelings
can be projected to other people and they are re-induced
(repeated) in them. Also, e.g. only moral and objective
persons generate positive feelings +Py while seeing
someone acting morally. On the other hand, for
example immoral people generate negative feelings
-Py at the sight of someone acting morally. In contrast,
people in love or in a state of adoration generate
positive feelings +Py even when they see immoral
behaviours of the person that they love or admire.
Moreover, both genders in love or admiration react
differently. For example, morally behaving males
typically try to correct the immoral behaviours of
loved or admired person. But morally acting females
typically accept moral deviations of loved or admired
person without taking any action.)
Notice that the above drawings show only the most
common situations in life, when both so-called "side
effects" of our behaviour, depicted above by component
vectors Py and Pz, have the same turns + or - (i.e. are
both running towards the growth +, or towards the decline -,
of the values of the coordinates Y or Z). However,
in real life there may also be 4 rare special cases
in which one of vectors Py and Pz takes a direction
opposite to the second of these vectors. In addition,
there may be also 4 less frequent special cases when a person
is acting in such a way, that he or she is NOT seen by
other people in whom his or her actions would generate
positive or negative feelings Py, and thus when the
vector Py is equal to zero - that is, when the feelings
of other people do NOT generate, nor dissipate the
moral energy (nor generate karma) in the person performing
these actions. In addition, further 6 cases describe
situations, when someone sitting comfortably in his or
her office-armchair decides what is to be implemented
by other people, and thus when his or her vector of the
contribution of physical work Pz is equal to zero. Dynamic
"moral field" also turns into "immoral" every life situation,
when our conscience and moral laws expect us to do
something, but we do nothing (that is, the situation
when our Px=0, Py=0 and Pz=0) - for details see
item #E3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
In total, in addition to shown above 4 most typical cases,
in real life there are further 15 of such less frequent special
cases, which are NOT shown here to avoid their meddling
and confusing our explanations. (Click on a selected
drawing if you wish to see it enlarged. After clicking on
drawing "a", is to appear an enlargement of the different
drawing prepared to the same convention as remaining
three drawings of this illustration.)
In the
philosophy of totalizm,
or more precisely in its quantitative sub-discipline called the
"Totaliztic Mechanics", every human action is a kind of
movement in the force field. By a "human action"
one needs to understand everything that people do in their
minds, and that then is manifested in the physical world,
including intellectual work such as "decision making".
This movement either overcomes pressure of forces from
the three-dimensional force field, or is giving up to this
pressure and is driven by it. For example, the doing of
everything that is "moral" (e.g. carrying out "good deeds")
overcomes the pressure forces of the "moral field" F=ma.
In turn indulging in all kinds of pleasures, is effortless,
because it is driven by the thrust of this "moral field".
In the above illustrations the movement of any human
action is visualized as vector P (the symbol P of it is
derived from the Polish word meaning "Moral Work").
In turn, the three kinds of opposition forces that this
vector P must overcome, are actually ambient resistances,
which act in opposition to arrows of three coordinate
axes marked above as the axes X, Y and Z. These
resistances always oppose the components: moral
(X), feelings (Y), and physical (Z), that are almost
always present in practically every human action.
Out of the three ambient resistances, the most
important is the resistance of so-called "moral field" -
on the above illustrations shown as a yellow arrow,
which onto the human minds (m) acts with the force F=ma
in a manner very similar to that one which on physical
masses (e.g. on our bodies) acts the gravity field well-known
to all of us. The importance of the "moral field"
stems from the fact, that it defines whether the action
that someone just tries to carry out is "moral" or is
"immoral". However, practically along each of three
axes visible above an ambient resistance is
working. For example, along the Y axis works the
ambient resistance of feelings resulting from
the fact, that virtually everything what we do and
about what other people somehow learn, is to
stimulate in other people the generation of some kind
of feelings towards us. In turn, along the Z axis runs
a physical ambient resistance which forces us to contribute
a significant physical effort in a noticeable proportion
of our actions. If the vector of our actions P is directed
as in part (a) of this illustration, that is, if it overcomes
the ambient resistance opposing the componential
movements Px, Py and Pz directed towards the positive
arrows of each axis X, Y and Z, then each component
Px, Py and Pz of this movement P generates a
proportional amount of the so-called "moral energy"
(i.e. the energy which is absolutely necessary for us
to life - as this is explained in item #F5 from this web
page). However, in every case when a component Px,
Py and/or Pz is directed toward the negative values
of the axes X, Y and Z, this "moral energy", instead
of being generated, is dissipated. In other words,
when for example, we put the required effort F and
motivations "s" in our actions, and in this way we cause,
that our actions generate positive feelings +Py in people
who know about them, then these feelings add us
"moral energy". However, if these actions generate
negative feelings -Py in other people, then such actions
deprive us specific amount of "moral energy". Similarly
is with the Z-axis, means with the physical work. If in
our physical work we put a certain effort "F" and motivation
"s", then it also generates us a specific amount of "moral
energy". However, if such an action is effortless, or
even generates a physical pleasure for us, then it will
deprive us a specific portion of our "moral energy".
This is why the components Py and Pz of our actions
P popularly are called "side effects". What is even
worse, feelings Y which by our actions we generate
in other people, after a certain time return to us in
accordance with the "moral law" that the philosophy
of totalizm calls the "Boomerang Principle" and that
some Eastern cultures call
"karma".
Thus, if in other people we generated a pleasant feeling,
the Boomerang Principle also returns to us a pleasant
feeling. However, if the feelings of other people were
unpleasant, this law also returns to us a similar unpleasantness.
Fig. #I1a:
The most desirable situation of doing "moral work",
which, however, is also the most difficult for accomplishing, because
it imposes onto the doer the biggest number of requirements.
In this situation, the person doing the work P managed to design
it so intelligently, that the component vector Px of this work is
climbing uphill in the "moral field", and thus that this work meets
the criteria of being a "moral work" +Px, and also that it generates
to its doer a significant increase of "moral energy" equal to the
potential energy of overcoming the force F=ma of this field.
In addition, components Py and Pz also have positive values,
and thus each one of them also generates a proportional amount
of "moral energy". Unfortunately, due to the tendency of many
people with deviated morality to generate negative feelings (-Py)
even when someone does good for them, the above situation
occurs only very rarely - for example, typically during the
professional work of positively motivated nurses with very
sick people that are in need of assistance (for more details
see items #B3 and #D1 from the web page named
nirvana.htm),
or e.g. during the work of former grass cutters (hard working
with hands). It is just to avoid dispersion of our "moral energy"
by the negative feelings of biased other people, that totalizm
recommends that "moral work" should be carried out anonymously
(i.e. when Py=0) - so that other people do NOT know who is the
doer and thus do NOT send us negative feelings (-Py).
The above drawing from part (a) documents a big
sense of humour of God in the illustrating to us the
work of so-called "Murphy Laws". (I.e. laws described,
amongst others, in item #C6 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.)
This Figure, similarly like all the drawings from this
illustration, is in fact the result of coordinated voluntarily
efforts of one of the readers of this web page - having
access to the required graphic tools, with the efforts
of the remote consultation (by emails) of the author
of this web page - having a vision of how this illustration
should look like, but deprived of graphical tools required
to prepare it by himself. As a result, "everything that could
go wrong during the consulting and coordination of the
appearance of this illustration, actually went wrong" -
hence the drawing shown above in part (a) is already
10th version of itself, adding a highly humorous aspect
to the serious task of helping the reader to understand
the ideas that this Figure is trying to reflect, and also
multiplying by a factor of 10 the amount of work required
for the preparation of it. Of course, everything that God
does or inspires, serves an important purpose. So if the
consulting of the above drawing from part (a) required the
initial preparation of as many as 10 its versions, and it is
still not the way it should be, apparently with the help of
it God tried to make us realize vital truths regarding principles
of consultation and coordination of relevant team efforts.
I wonder whether the reader spots in that part (a) of the
Figure, what still differs from the conventions adopted for
the preparation of this type of illustrations? Let me add
here, that after the 10th version of this drawing, the
method of consultation and coordination of our activities
has been improved, while the remaining drawings are
already the product of this new method. (Click on the
above green "Fig. #I1a" to see an enlargement of
different version of the same moral situation drawn
in identical convention as the remaining three drawings
of this illustration.)
Fig. #I1b:
A typical situation which deviates the today's attempts to implement
"moral works" of a "good deed" type - professionally
appearing, for example, during the work of today's teachers (and
university lecturers) typically teaching students deprived of respect,
or e.g. in activities of some today's New Zealand farmers and some
professional sportsmen. Note, that in this situation the person
performing a given action puts the intellectual effort Px, so that this
action is "moral", means that it climbs uphill in the "moral field".
However, he or she do NOT put in there neither the physical effort
Pz required (e.g. in the case of teachers, their assistants or students
carry for them and prepare the required facilities, equipment, and
experiments, clean boards, etc.), nor the required emotional effort Py
(e.g. in the case of teachers their students are deprived of respect,
or rebel against their teaching methods, or do NOT like them, etc. -
which situation generates negative feelings -Py that deprive lecturers
of "moral energy" and that generate "bad karma" for them). As a result,
in spite that the action is a "good deed" because it progresses uphill
in the moral field, still in total it disperses rather than generates the "moral
energy" of the person undertaking it, and also generates a bad karma.
This type of situation often also takes a place for some New Zealand
farmers, for which the negative feelings and karma generate e.g. jealous
neighbours and badly treated animals, while in addition which complete
everything with machines or with hands of hired workers, putting into
their work almost zero of physical effort. As a result, amongst these
farmers prevails a low level of "moral energy" - which evokes in them
an "epidemic of suicides", described, among others, in item #F5 of
this web page.
Fig. #I1c:
Sometimes appearing situation, when a given action produces
pleasure, means it runs downhill in the moral field, but it still
generates a bit of "moral energy" and positive feelings -
encountered e.g. in a noticeable number of political decisions,
in the life of popular actors and personalities, in the actions of
very loved children, etc. In this situation, the person making
a given action is so admired and loved, that no matter how
immorally he or she acts, still other people send to it positive feelings
Py - thereby continually increasing the level of his or her moral energy.
If, in addition, this person puts a substantial physical effort Pz
into whatever is doing, then his or her "moral energy" can be
maintained at a high level. Unfortunately, when for some reasons
(e.g. actors getting old, or loved children leaving home) the
popularity of this person passes, the habits of immoral conduct,
which typically he or she is NOT able to get rid of quickly, turn
his or her situation into the one shown in part (d) of this Figure.
As a result, after the exhaustion of his or her "moral energy",
that person may end up committing a suicide (see item #F5
of this web page).
Fig. #I1d:
The worst (but most frequently appearing today) moral situation,
when someone's actions do not meet the criteria of morality and are
further aggravated by adverse "side effects" - e.g. as
this is the case in described on this web page situation with the stadium
in Petone. In the situation shown here, virtually every component
(-Px), (-Py) and (-Pz) of the action taken by the person executing it,
passively slides down under the pressure of ambient forces,
causing the loss of the necessary for life "moral energy" of that person.
The reason is that the person does NOT make the moral effort Px -
which situation in short term disseminates his or her moral energy,
while in long term exposes him or her to a severe punishments
by "moral laws". He or she also does not put any effort neither
in the physical component Pz of his or her actions, nor in the
inducing of favourable feelings Py of other people - thus
generating an unpleasant karma. As a result, if a given person
regularly takes this type of actions, then he or she quickly ends
up either committing a suicide - as this is explained in item #F5
of this web page, or even God intentionally eliminates him or her
in some other way in a relatively young age, so that this avoids
giving by him or by her a bad example to other people (as it is
explained in item #G1 from the web page named
will.htm.)
* * *
In caption under the above illustration I referred
to fates of individual people, because such fates
are best known to the reader, and thus allow the
reader to most easily understand the ideas presented
here. However, independently from individual
people, our civilisation is composed of so-called
"group intellects"
defined more precisely in item #E2 from the web page
totalizm.htm -
means whole families, institutions, cities, nations,
countries, etc. These "group intellects" also lead
their own lives, and thus also are subjected to the
work of "moral laws", "moral field", action of
karma, etc. -
the same as subjected to them are individual
people. Thus everything that I explained above,
independently from individual people applies also
to these "group intellects", including e.g. the actions
of parliament of every country and the actions of
every country as a whole. (Several examples of
returns of karma for "group intellects" are presented
in item #A2 from the web page named
petone.htm.)
#I2.
The family of philanthropists that New Zealand
is lucky to have, but who gives a "bear's favour"
through the stadium project for Petone:
New Zealand has been blessed by God with
the family consisting of a father and a son,
in which the son has the gift of turning into
money practically everything that he touches -
so he works as king Midas from the Greek
mythology. The reader can read about this
family from the article [1#I2] entitled
"He made $227m selling Trade Me, now ... ",
from page A1 of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post Weekend
(issue dated on Saturday - Sunday, March 22-23, 2014).
(Please note that this newspaper and the article
can be found, among others, on the Internet
newspaper service [2#I2] existing at the address
pressdisplay.com/pressdisplay/viewer.aspx,
while described in item #D9 from my web page named
faq.htm.
In the service [2#I2] that article [1#I2] can be even
read for free, because it is on the first (title) page,
while the first pages this service [2#I2] allows
to read for free.) To this family of dedicated
philanthropists is also devoted the article
[3#I2]
from pages #C1 and #C2 of the same number
and the same newspaper [1#I2]. The family
described here uses the earned funds in a
number of extremely valuable ways - for example,
significantly contributing to the protection
of New Zealand 's unique wildlife and nature.
However, most probably this family is too busy
to check their projects, whether they fulfil
the moral criteria required for avoiding
undesirable side effects, or is unaware of
the need for such checking, because some
of their projects
seem to divide people instead of connecting
people. As such, these projects
raise waves of anger among potential recipients -
as an example see the brief article [4#I2]
"I refuse to put my cats on a leash", from page A12 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Thursday, March 27, 2014).
One of the projects of this family, is the
stadium in Petone which is to be constructed
in the area shown in "Fig. #I2" below.
Unfortunately, the implementing of this stadium
project turns out to be a kind of the "bear's favour".
Fig. #I2. Here is a kind of small green football-field/park from
the center of Petone township, called the "Petone Recreation
Ground". It is here that the stadium is to be built which just
rumbles the battle described on this web page. Originally this
area was built for horse racing. It is from these races that remains
this building with rows of seats for spectators visible in the centre
of the photo. However, recently I spoke with a Petone resident
born here 71 years ago. He assured me that for the last 71 years
in the football-field/park shown here has NOT been even a single
horse race. This makes even more surprising that striking on the
green field the relatively strong smell that me resembles of the
smell of horse urine mixed with muddy smell like of water from
geysers. This smell was clearly felt when I took the above
photograph on Wednesday, 16th of April 2014. Because exactly
under that particular field passes the famous seismic "fault",
I personally suspect that this smell can come from gases
escaping underground from that "fault". If my suspicion
proves to be true, then constructing in this place a closed
bowl of the stadium would result in the gradual inflating it
with underground gases which now are dispelled by strong
winds that constantly blow in this area. This in turn would
mean a threat to the life of the people coming to the stadium -
as is explained in (8) from item #I3 below.
Notice also the captured on the above
image a fragment of stationary "window in the sky" in the shape
of an ellipse, which repetitively appears above Petone, which
I had seen over Petone (and only over Petone) many times,
and which I describe more extensively in (15) from item #I3
while illustrate on "Fig. #I3ab" from the web page named
petone.htm.
The above football-field/park is the only publicly
accessible large walking area located in the middle
of low-riser buildings of Petone town. It is also
the only area well lit at night and on all sides
surrounded by windows of surrounding buildings -
which makes it relatively safe even at night. Hence
teoretically speaking the neighboring inhabitants,
including single women, should NOT be afraid to
go to this park for a walk or for jogging even after
dark - which is NOT possible in other green areas
flanking Petone. (But I must add here, that although
in times of living in my previous flat I frequently shortened
my way home in late eveneings through just this park,
I never saw in it after darkness a single woman taking
a walk, or jogging - as this is a typical picture in parks of e.g. the
South Korea.)
So leaving this area as it currently is, would NOT deprive
Petone the most important of its parks, and at the same
time would NOT stop its use as a field for all possible
games - in which character it is used since a
relatively old times. However, closing it by building
of the stadium, takes away all of its current functions
and deprive a safe access to it by local residents.
In addition, such a stadium would tower over the
surrounding low-level houses, forming a kind of
architectural oddity that would spoil the present
charm of the town of Petone.
#I3.
What the problem with building
the stadium in Petone is all about:
Motto:
"The art of doing good deeds which is taught by the
philosophy of totalizm
depends on making such decisions and actions which
consequences unite and bring people together, not
divide them and expand the gaps between them."
The project to build a stadium in Petone is
highly unfortunate. Almost immediately after
the proposing of it, the project raised mainly
criticism and opposition - as an example see
the article [1#I3] entitled "Caution
advised on new stadium plan", from page 1
of the newspaper
The Hutt News
(issue dated on Tuesday, February 25, 2014),
or see the article [2#I3] entitled "More
details called for in Petone Arena discussions",
from page 2 of the newspaper
The Petone Chronicle
(issue 6, dated on March 8, 2014). Actually, I personally
never have met anyone who would really support
this project. It has been criticized by almost all the
inhabitants of Petone. Diplomatically "wrapped into
cotton wool" criticism of it is contained also in virtually
every newspaper article about it - as an example see
the article [3#I3] entitled "Don't hurry decision
on Petone stadium", from page A10 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Thursday, March 20, 2014), or the article
[4#I3] entitled "New stadium neither wanted nor
needed", from page C4 of the same newspaper and number,
as previously indicated articles [1#I2] and [3#I2].
There are dozens of reasons for which the stadium
should NOT be built. It is because of these reasons,
if indeed a miracle happens and I won the election
described here, then I intend to do everything in my
power to prevent the problems that would induce
the eventual completion of this unfortunate project.
(For example, I would try then to replace this unfortunate
project of the stadium, with some other project that
would be more needed by the people of Petone and
the Hutt Valley, for example by the project of the
"workshop for inventors" described in item #D1
from this web page. Also, I would make sure then,
that the financing of this
one, or any other project, is NOT impoverishing further
the residents of the Hutt Valley - means, that this
financing will NOT depend on the increase of rates
and rents, but either receives government funding,
or will be paid entirely by the volunteers-philanthropists).
Let us list here at least several amongst the most
important of these reasons:
1.
Only around 8 km from Petone is located a huge stadium
in Wellington, which potential remains untapped.
(See "Fig. #I3" which shows it.)
So after the construction of the stadium in Petone, both
these stadiums would be so close together that each of
them would be seen from the other one. That Wellington
stadium is much better than what the people of Petone
(who must pay for the most of construction and maintenance
costs of their stadium), will be able to ever afford. It has
all the infrastructure required from the stadium, I mean
it has parking, proximity to public transport - including
transport coming from Petone, toilets, customer buffets,
proximity to shops, etc. It is also used only in a small part -
hence it can be used by these activities for which the stadium
in Petone supposed to serve. In practice, therefore, if it
starts to compete for clients with the stadium in Petone,
then almost no-one chooses to arrive at the events in
Petone - so the stadium in Petone becomes a kind of
"bankrupt" artificially kept alive with the money forced
out of the inhabitants of small surrounding towns.
2.
Already is announced the offloading the construction costs
of this stadium onto the shoulders of residents of Petone
and Hutt Valley. Along with their neighbours, Petonians
have to pay the amount already estimated at $25 million.
All this when many inhabitants of Petone claim that they
still are paying for the previous building of the huge stadium
in nearby Wellington (I do NOT know how to check this
claim). We also must remember, that New Zealand has
a long tradition of exceeding significantly the preliminary
estimates of the costs of public projects - sometimes
even in the range of more than 10 times more. Bearing
in mind, that the total population of
Petone
is only about 6600 people (including children and the elderly),
the cost of this construction is really "the last straw that can
break the camel's back". After all, a number of Petone's residents
already now struggles to make ends meet, and already many of
them cannot even afford to purchase all the food they need -
for details see the article from item #A2 from this web page
(i.e. the article labelled [1#A2]). How these people, since 2008
continuously troubled by lack of employment and by high
prices increases still supposed to find the money to build
another costly stadium.
3.
The stadium is supposed to be built in the only green area
which Petone has in the central area. This area is now
a kind of "green lungs" for the town. However, after the
construction of the stadium it will change its role. In the
article [3#I3] the change of these "green lungs" from the
centre of Petone, in a concrete freak, is described as "the
rape on the recreational area" of the town.
4.
Petone is a quiet suburb in which live people in need
of peace. Meanwhile, some inhabitants believe that the
stadium located in the center of town will only bring to
them loud noise, alcohol, excited game fans, prospect of
street fighting between militant supporters of opposite
teams of players, squealing of tyres of excited teenagers,
drunken fans wandering into local homes, gardens, and
yards, etc., etc.
5.
Petone does NOT have the infrastructure required by the
presence of the stadium. I mean, it does NOT have
the required number of public car parks, toilets, nearby
cafeterias, public transport stations, etc. In turn, this lack
of infrastructure, on the one hand may cause numerous
problems of the kind of match fans emptying their bellies
in doorways of buildings and on thresholds of shops.
On the other hand, most probably it will force the town
authorities to impose further increases of rates and
rents for starting to create the required infrastructure.
6.
Every game in this stadium can leave piles of rubbish in
Petone. After all, it cannot be guaranteed that tipsy
match fans will not drop at random packing from sandwiches
eaten, will NOT smash beer bottles on streets, will NOT
pour urine in gates and at doors of houses and shops,
etc. In such cases, the cleaning and tidying up this junk
is to fall on the heads of the people of Petone - which
means increased payments for rates and rents, the need
to purchase expensive cleaning equipment and the
employment of many cleaners, damaging cars on the
glass broken on streets, lack of hygiene, the new kinds
of risks to children, etc., etc.
7.
The stadium will spoil the charm of Petone. At the
moment, Petone has an unique charm of the former
colonial small town. There is an important reason
why it is described as a boutique township. However,
if in the very centre of this low-rising town starts to
tower a bizarre and ugly stadium, the entire charm
is to disappear. Of course, the stadium in Petone
almost certainly will be ugly - for the simple reason
that the inhabitants of Petone cannot afford an
expensive stadium, while our lives are ruled by the
regularity, that everything cheap almost by definition
must also be ugly. (Malaysian Chinese express this
regularity with a cheeky proverb "you pay peanuts,
you get monkeys".) In addition, New Zealand has
a long tradition of building ugly stadiums - as an
example it is worth it to see the stadium in nearby
Wellington, which has the shape of a metal tin of
canned cat food, and is probably the ugliest
architectural structure in the entire Southern
Hemisphere which has become the architectural symbol
of the capital city of a country - see "Fig. #I3"
below.
8.
Stadium in Petone may bring various unrecognized yet
threats to human lives. After all, it will be built exactly
over the seismic "fault" (infamous "ring of fire" from Pacific)
that runs just under the centre of Petone. In turn, these
seismic "faults" are known that, amongst others, sometimes
they can also emit various toxic gases. For example, from
newspaper articles indicated in item #K1.3 of the web page named
newzealand.htm,
it transpires that not far from Petone in the town of Rotorua,
from poisoning by toxic gases carried by water from undergrounds,
just since 2000 already at least 4 people have died. At present,
such toxic gases, if they are emitted in Petone, are blown away
by strong Wellington's winds. But if a stadium is build, they
will be trapped and accumulated inside of the large structure.
So it cannot be excluded, that gases escaping from the
underground someday are to fill up the stadium and kill
everyone who would be unlucky to enter it. Especially,
that already now the area on which the stadium is to be
built emits some strange smells, which I described in
item #B3 of the web page named
petone.htm,
that for me remind a strong smell of horse urine (ammonia).
So the question that would be worth to ask at this stage, is
whether the people who push
the building of stadium in Petone, are also prepared to take
later the responsibility for a possible loss of human lives -
if such a loss of lives takes place in their structure?
On Monday, March 17, 2014 in Petone was held the
public discussion of this stadium project. For this
discussion come around 200 people - almost all of
whom expressed their opposition and protest against
the construction of this stadium. Echoes of these
protests were later repeated in articles from the local
newspapers, such as the one indicated in [1#I1]. I could
NOT come to this meeting, because at that time I had
another meeting already agreed several days earlier.
That is why I sent only to the authorities organizing
this meeting my email which expressed the protest
on behalf of myself and the people to whom I spoke
earlier. My email also described 13 important reasons
why in Petone NO stadium should be built. Some of
these reasons I repeated above. In spite of all these
protests and opposition, the council of Hutt City still
decided to include the construction of the stadium
in Petone into their plans. The disappointment of
people by this inclusion is indescribably strong.
From it originates also my decisions and actions
that are described on this web page.
Fig. #I3. This giant "tin" with a huge red advertising
letter "W", is the stadium in Wellington. Sydney has
its opera, Rio de Janeiro has its Statue of Jesus, while
the capitol of New Zealand managed to erect this "tin"
for its architectural symbol. To make sure that tourists
to NOT overlook it, the "tin" was erected on the visiting
part of waterfront, just by the passenger port where
exclusive "cruise" ships with overseas tourists are docking,
and where is located the major sea-ferry terminal which
links both most important islands of New Zealand.
Many Hutt Valley voters complained to me that they still
have NOT stopped paying for this stadium in Wellington,
and soon they may have to pay also for the construction
of a probably equally eye-catching relative in the centre
of nearby Petone.
From the writing that appears in the above "tin"
it is easy to notice that officially it is called the
"Westpac Stadium". The name "Wespac" is a
name of an Australian bank having its branches
also in New Zealand. The bank supposedly paid
the highest amount of money out of all donations
to build this stadium. So as a return of gratefullness
for this donation, the stadium was named after the
bank - thus giving to the bank a free advertising
which will extend for the lifetime of this stadium.
However, the bank has rather unfavorable opinion
among the New Zealanders. It is known, inter
alia, for low interest paid to owners of term deposit
accounts, for stingy wages paid to its employees,
for one of the highest in the country payments to
its directors, for the "user unfriendliness"
expressed, amongst others, by ignoring appeals
of users to keep the branches of this bank open
in towns that need to have a bank, but which are
too small to generate for these branches the level
of profit required by the management of the bank,
and for a few further reasons - e.g. for the financing
in Brazil a sugar corporation known because of the
"land-grab" from native Indians to industrially plant
sugar cane on this land - for details see a part of
the program "60 minutes" broadcasted in NZ TV
on channel "Prime" on Tuesday, 16 December
2014, around 20:15. During my conversations
with voters surprisingly many of them stated that
this bank is NOT deserving to have "Westpac Stadium"
named after it. In addition to reasons mentioned above,
the unsuitability of this name was justified, among
others, by pointing out that if the amount of donations
given by Westpac for the construction of the stadium
is compared to the size of the income which Westpac
draws from New Zealand, and after that it is compared
to the unitary amount similarly calculated for payments
of the entire population of the Wellington region which
each year must now pay back the cost of the construction
of the stadium in their rates, then it turns out that Westpac
donated for the construction of this stadium smallest
proportion of its earnings when compared to the inhabitants
of the whole Wellington region who also pay for this stadium.
Thus, according to the opinion of some voters, the stadium
should be named the "stadium of ratepayers from the Wellington
region", NOT the "Westapc Stadium". In addition, voters
believe that everything that bears the name of an existing
institution is actually an advertising of this institution, for
which advertising this institution should pay additionally
and constantly. But these voters are NOT aware that
the Westpac bank continuously pays anything for the
advertising visible from a great distance around the
perimeter of this stadium.
#I4.
The method of "steamroller" with which that project of stadium
in Petone ignored the democratic process, the opposition and
the free will of majority of population, caused that to be able to
transform this "bear's favours" kind of project into a "true favour",
I decided to put my candidacy for the elections discussed here:
The insensitivity with which, in spite of fierce
opposition and criticism, the project of this
stadium is pushed forward at the expense of
thousands of people - some of which do NOT
have enough money even for bread and electricity,
have become the proverbial "last straw".
The only other option which still remains
for turning this project into another
project that meets the criteria of morality, is
an use of political influence. However, since
the current MP (Member of Parliament) somehow
is NOT eager to fight out this project, I decided
that I will volunteer my candidacy for the elections,
and if a miracle happens and I actually become
elected to the parliament, then I will use everything
in my power to turn the stadium project into
another project, funded on different principles
(NOT through the increase of rates and rents),
which actually meets all the criteria of morality
(e.g. into the described in item #D1 project of
the "workshop for inventors").
#I5.
Quashing the project of Petone stadium: the victory of reason or a political manoeuvre?
After my return from 2014 vacation, as usual
I began to carefully study the local newspapers.
Soon my attention was attracted by two articles
seemingly looking as if they DO NOT have any
relationship, but actually together preparing
people to what is about to happen. The first
one [1#I5], entitled "A roof won't resolve
stadium issues", was published on page A10 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, June 11, 2014). It informed
readers that those who manage the stadium "Westpac"
in Wellington (i.e. the stadium shown in "Fig. #I3" from
this web page) are considering adding a roof to their
stadium. This roof is to cost around $60 to $100 million,
while the cost of stadium itself was $130 million. Of course,
the paying for the construction of the roof will lie on shoulders
of the inhabitants of the entire Wellington region, including
residents of the Hutt South electorate, whose rates are
to be additionally increased for this purpose. (Notice that
according to information repeated by many voters with
which I discussed this matter, ratepayers of the entire
Wellington region still have NOT finished repaying
the construction of this stadium advertising "Westpac".)
The second (very short) of these articles [2#I5]
had the title " 'Overwhelming negativity' quashes Petone
Arena plan" and was published on page A3 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Thursday, June 12, 2014).
This strangely short article reported that a
day earlier the voting results were announced
on the matter of continuing preparation for the
construction of the stadium in Petone, and that
this voting unanimously decided to cease the
further implementation of the project of stadium
in Petone - because supposedly 73% of the
population is opposed to this project. (My own
conversations with voters seemed to indicate that
almost 100% of voters were opposed to this project.)
The message from this second article [2#I5]
was later repeated in the article [3#I5]
entitled "Backlash leads to red card for arena",
from page 6 of newspaper
The Hutt News
(issue dated on Tuesday, June 17, 2014). That
article [3#I5] provides an intriguing information.
For example, that the council already spend
$120,000 for "investigating" this proposal, and
that for this purpose a part-timer contractor was
employed. Another intriguing information is that
the council has set aside $50,000 "to look at the
options for Petone Sportsville". This makes me
wonder whether the saga of Petone arena is
really finished, or is only temporally suspended
in a clever "political manoeuvre" aimed at preventing
persons like myself from winning the election only
because ratepayers from the Hutt South need
someone who would defend them from the
increases of rates, while soon after the election
the matter of building of Petone stadium is
somehow going to be revived again.
To summarise the above two articles, the meaning
of information contained therein is very simple.
Namely, someone out there decided e.g., that instead
of tormenting residents Hutt South electorate by
increasing their rates in order to build a stadium
in Petone, these ratepayers will be tormented by
increasing their rates to finance the roof over the
stadium in Wellington - credit and advertising from
which stadium will continue to benefit the wealthy
bank called "Westpac". Expressing this in other
words, apart of the name of the stadium towards
which the inhabitants of the Hutt South electorate
are to pay extra in their rates, as for now almost
nothing has changed in their struggle for freedom
from additional charges for someone else's pleasures.
Therefore, the most important election postulate from
item #D1 of this web page still remains valid, namely
in case of being elected
to the NZ parliament, I still consider as my highest
priority the release of the ratepayers of the Hutt South
electorate from additional charges inscribed into their
rates and designated for the construction of any stadium,
or for the construction of a roof in any stadium,
and to ensure that the stadium will either fund itself,
or its financing will actually originate either from the
sponsors, or from the institution which benefits from
its name.
Part #J:
Important decisions-making should be carried
out in accordance with principles of the
philosophy of totalizm -
i.e. with special consideration to moral requirements and criteria:
The official human science, i.e. that monopolistic
science which numerous erroneous claims still
today we have to learn in schools and at universities,
teaches us to believe in a misconception that every
problem has only a single correct solution, and
that this correct solution is the one which brings
the most of financial profits. On the other hand,
the
philosophy of totalizm
and the "totaliztic science" which is based on it,
determined that every real problem has many
solutions which differ amongst themselves by
the level of fulfillment of moral criteria, and that
the most correct one amongst these solutions is
that one which climbs most steeply uphill in the
"moral field" - i.e. in the field already described
in items #D5, #F5 and #I1 from this web page.
In turn the most vital attribute of that moral field
is described by the moral principle which can be
called the "principle of contradiction
between the short-term and the long-term
effects of work of the 'moral field' ". This
is because according to it,
moral field always provides two mutually opposite
"responses" to every our action - namely a short-term
one and a long-term one. In the long-term work of
the moral field only the solutions of a given problem
that climb uphill in the moral field actually solve
that problem. (The solutions which slide downhill
in the moral field only postpone to a later time
the need for an effective solving a given problem,
because their undesirable side effects change them
into contradictions of goals for which originally they
were taken - as an example consider pesticides
which kill beneficial insects, but spare pests which
already become pesticide-resistant, or consider
antibiotics which kill beneficial micro-organisms
while spare antibiotics-resistant bacteria of deadly
diseases.) In turn, amongst these morally correct
solutions, the smallest number of adverse side
effects generate these ones that climb the most
steeply uphill in the moral field.
#J1.
The guaranteed by totalizm method of making correct
decisions that truly solve human problems - means what the
philosophy of totalizm
explained to us about decisions and solving human problems:
Motto:
"The main goal of
totalizm
is to teach how to overcome human imperfections
in order to live morally, happily, peacefully, in prosperity,
and in harmony with God, nature and other people."
Before anything we do physically, always
beforehand we undertake a number of
decisions and choices in our mind. Only
that most of them are made automatically,
so that many of us are NOT aware of this
fact - in the same way as most of time we
are unaware of our breathing. For example,
whether we should sit on a chair or on the
couch, or use a spoon or a fork, etc. However,
even if a majority of decisions come to us
automatically and in an unaware manner, still
a human life actually
turns out to be one long string of decisions.
In turn, on the outcomes of these decisions
depends the quality, result and course
of our life.
All decisions are made in our minds. Therefore,
their results always are governed by the principles
of operation of that "moral field" already
described in items #D5, #F5 and #I1 from this web
page. Amongst these principles, the most important
one is that "principle of contradiction
between the short-term and the long-term effects
of work of the 'moral field' " - the existence
and work of which I already emphasized in the introduction
to this "part #J". The work of this principle is so
repetitive and so decisive, that it can be used as
another so-called "indicator of moral correctness"
described in item #C4.2.1 from my web page named
morals.htm.
Unfortunately, still only a few people know how
this moral field works and what principles and
laws govern over it. After all, for the first time
in the world the moral field was discovered and
thoroughly described only by the
philosophy of totalizm.
But this philosophy come to know so far only a
relatively few people. Hence, only those few people
know how to make correct decisions. The rest of
the people still act as the outcomes of education
supervised by our official science dictate it to them.
But this science erroneously insists to teach us in
schools and at universities, that every problem has
only one correct solution, and that this solution is the
one which provides us with the maximum of financial
gains - as I indicated this to the reader already at
the beginning of the introduction to this web page
and in the first lines of this "part #J". So instead of
wisely choosing in their decisions a really correct
solution to a given problem, most of people blindly
implement whatever brings to them the highest
financial benefits - although typically it is NOT the
correct solution for their problem. As a result of these
erroneous beliefs etched in us by the official science,
most of people make the wrong decisions that are
immoral because they slide down in the moral field.
But for making such immoral decisions the moral field
imposes severe penalties. Of course, if someone
makes such decisions only for his or her private use,
then these penalties typically affect only him or her.
However, if the government or the parliament of a
country makes wrong (immoral) decisions, which
affect all the people from this country, and sometimes
even people from abroad, then the penalty for taking
immoral decisions adversely spoil the life of every
citizen of that country, while sometimes even the
life of every inhabitant of Earth. For this reason,
it is vital that governments and parliaments have
learned how to make decisions in accordance
with principles and criteria of morality revealed to
us by the Bible and by the philosophy of totalizm.
The great thing about methods developed by the
philosophy of totalizm is that the principle of
making correct decisions remain exactly the
same, no matter who and what decision is making.
Thus totalizm provides us with an excellent
tool that works equally reliably both in our private
decision-making, as well as in decision-making
at a governmental or a parliamentary level.
This means that to the decisions on very significant
matters from our private everyday life, and to the
decisions of which results are to affect the whole
country, apply the same methods and principles.
Namely, to NOT be transformed during a long-acting
into a denial of the purpose for which a decision
was originally made, and to NOT generate the
undesirable side effects which would invalidate
the goal of this decision, each decision must be
pedantically moral - means it must climb possibly
most steeply uphill in the moral field. This requirement
is in fact the source of only request which the philosophy
of totalizm imposes on us, and which states that
"whatever you do, always
do it pedantically morally - that is, in a manner
that is climbing the most steeply uphill in the
moral field".
That request of totalizm, to do everything in a
pedantically moral manner, causes that totalizm
distinguishes only two types of decisions, namely
(1) morally correct decisions,
the implementation of which lifts the doer uphill
in the moral field, and (2)
immoral decisions, the implementation
of which pushes the doer downhill in the moral field.
Furthermore, the findings of totalizm also provide
us with the tools that allow an easy and quick
distinguishing of a morally correct decision from
an immoral decision. Descriptions of these tools
are indicated in item #J2 below. One of the principles
of such a fast distinguishing between both these
kinds of decisions, is based on the previously
explained in items #D5, #F5 and #I1 of this web
page differences between short-term (immediate)
and long-term consequences of the implementation
of the morally correct decisions, and immoral
decisions - expressed by the previously described
"principle of of contradiction
between the short-term and the long-term effects
of work of the moral field". Namely,
the implementation of morally correct decisions
immediately is always hampered by the moral field,
and hence it is difficult, requiring insertion of a
substantial effort, encountering criticism and opposition
from many other people, while the beneficial consequences
of such morally correct decisions become apparent
only in the long-term work. In turn the implementation
of immoral decision in short-term is facilitated by the
moral field, and thus instantly these decisions are
easy to make, effortless, and bringing pleasures,
immediate recognition of many other people, as well
as bringing a whole range of immediate benefits.
However, in the long-term the work of immoral decisions
release such a large amount of unwanted side-effects
that these side effects transform immoral decisions
into the denial of the purposes for which they were
originally taken, and in addition they transform
their beneficial consequences into undesirable
consequences. As a result, these side effects
only intensify the need to re-find a morally correct
solution to the problems that originally these
immoral decisions intended to solve. In total,
immoral decisions
do NOT solve human problems, but only
escalate these problems and postpone to a
later date the need for their solving in morally
correct manner.
At this point it is worth to note, that what totalizm
determined about making decisions, is the exact
opposite of what many people believe and practice.
Namely, totalizm recommends
to insist on decisions that are morally correct, and
thus for which during their making and implementation
the moral field generates an immediate resistance that
originates from humans - that is, which making and
implementation in a short-term is difficult and requires
a significant amount of mental work, because
it runs along the so-called "line of the greatest
intellectual resistance", but is realistic
and possible for us to implement, while do NOT
meet resistance originating from God
(for examples see descriptions from items #N2 and #N3
of this web page and compare these with what is explained
in item #J3 of this web page). This is because only
such morally-correct decisions in the long-term
actually solve the problem for which they were made.
On the other hand, many
people believe that confronting immediate (short-term)
difficulties and intellectual effort in making and later
implementing decisions, is a kind of "bad omen", or
a bad investment of their time and resources, and
thus that one should NOT insist on such decisions,
but best is to quickly abandon their implementation.
Of course, every decision after being taken in
our minds, awaits its implementation in the
physical world. This implementation can also be
made in a morally correct manner, or in an immoral
way. Fortunately for us, principles of physical
implementations of decisions in a way that meets
the strict criteria of morality, are already understood
by people much better than principles of mental
making morally correct decisions. (This is why only
principles of mental making morally correct decisions
are described so thoroughly in this item). After all,
these physical implementations require only the
use of commonly known principles of pedantically
moral behaviours. In turn moral behaviours are
explained to us exactly by the Bible, Christianity,
karma, philosophy of totalizm, etc. So, I do
NOT need to repeat here these explanations.
I should only remind here, that the final results
of even the morally most correct decisions may
be undermined by immoral implementations of
these decisions. However, if
a decision is morally correct, and if then
it is implemented in the physical world in a
morally correct manner, then totalizm guarantees,
that the long-term consequences of this decision
are to solve permanently the human problem for
solving of which this decision was made.
In the explanations from this item I tried to emphasize,
that the philosophy of totalizm stresses for us
this quite shocking fact, namely that
immoral decisions which
try to solve any real problem, actually never
solve that problem, but only escalate and move
(postpone) to a later date the need to find a
morally correct solution for that problem.
This is because immoral decisions only provide
a short-term substitute for solving the
problem, or the impression of solving
the problem, but then in the long-term action
of their unwanted "side effects" they restore
again and further escalate the situation that was
prevailing prior to the implementation of such immoral
solution to this problem. As a result, if someone decides
to solve a problem in an immoral manner, i.e. in a manner
that effortlessly slides down in the moral field, then
after the long-term, the side effects of this solving
are to appear, thus this someone faces again the problem
of finding a morally correct solution to the same problem,
and in addition he or she has yet to solve a whole range
of additional problems caused by the undesirable
side effects of the implementation of the immoral
solution to this problem. So in fact, the only
truly final solving of any
real problem in life, is to solve it according to the
criteria of morality, means to solve it in a manner
that climbs uphill in the moral field.
Let us indicate now several well-known examples
of immoral decisions, taken from the real life.
They prove the truth of the above findings of totalizm -
especially the finding that the immoral decisions
do NOT solve problems for which they were originally
made, but only postpone to a later date the need
to find morally correct solutions to these problems.
At the same time, due to the commonly prevailing
lack of knowledge about the work of the moral field,
these decisions are NOT considered to be incorrect
(immoral) by most of people today -
and this in spite that in the obvious way they reveal
their long-term adverse side-effects that transform
them into denials of the goals for which they were
originally taken. And so, a perfect example of an
immoral decision that supposed to solve a problem
confronted often by individual people, and depending
on finding a companion for life (a soul mate),
is to marry someone with whom we are joined,
for example, by a physical lust, but NOT by an
actual kinship of souls. After such a marriage
a quick divorce usually comes - unless someone
deliberately avoids a divorce at the expense of
the suffering for the rest of his or her life. In case
of divorce one again needs to find someone for
the rest of life, and also typically one must also
somehow solve problems of "side effects" in the
form of fates of children or the losses and division
of life achievements. In turn excellent examples
of immoral decisions that supposed to solve
massive problems confronted by our entire civilization,
which, however, have NOT solved these problems,
are decisions implemented so far by people in
matters of territorial disputes, harmful insects,
dangerous germs, and also cases of massive printing
of money as well as consequences of the implementation
of the theory of relativity. After all, for example the
territorial disputes people typically try to resolve
through the aggression and wars - that is, in an
obviously immoral way (as it is explained in item
#I2 from the web page named
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm).
However, after these wars are finished, people
still have to sit at the table and negotiate a real
solution to the territorial dispute, and in addition
they must somehow solve also the numerous
further problems caused just by these wars. The
problem of harmful insects people have attempted
to solve through the immoral decision to implement
pesticides - the first of which was DDT. Unfortunately,
the ability of insects to acquire resistance to pesticides
caused that now people still have to find a morally
correct solution to the same problem of harmful
insects, and in addition they must also solve many
problems from the side effects of prolonged use of
pesticides (e.g. destruction of beneficial insects,
soil saturation with pesticides inducing cancer,
allergies, etc.). A similar situation as with the
harmful insects, is also with pathogenic bacteria.
An immoral solution to this problem were antibiotics -
the first of which was penicillin. Unfortunately,
most of malignant bacteria have acquired resistance
to antibiotics, so that now people confront once
again the need to find a moral solution to the
same problem of harmful bacteria (hopefully,
this time it will be a morally correct solution),
and in addition people must also solve many
problems resulting from undesirable side effects
of the broad use of antibiotics. From history we
also know that the printing of money (already
described in item #G2 of this web page) always
in a long-term brings a denial of itself, that is,
brings a financial crash. Quite disturbing are
also long-term consequences of the decision
to implement the theory of relativity to teaching
and to canons of physics. Already now this
decision to implement the theory of relativity
turns out to be a denial of the purposes for
which it was made, i.e. the theory of relativity
quite openly blocks already (rather than supports)
the progress of the human knowledge in a whole
range of areas - for example, by preventing the
official recognition and popularization of discoveries
of particles faster than light, by blocking the official
recognition of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and
all consequences of this concept (e.g. official
recognition of the philosophy of totalizm), by
preventing scientists from even just considering
the possibility that our physical world is ageing
accordingly to two different times (irreversible
and reversible) described in item #F4 from this web
page, and it blocks progress in many further ways.
All the above features are in turn characteristic
for taking and for implementing of all kinds of
immoral decisions - as this is explained in more
detail in item #H3 from the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm.
A curiosity, about which it is worth to mention here,
is that the making of immoral decisions on matters
vital for the humanity, does NOT limit itself to our
past only. Actually even now the moral criteria
of totalizm allow us to identify clearly numerous
rather vital decisions, which also display all the
attributes of highly immoral decisions. Thus, at
the moment they do NOT solve problems for which
they are made, but only escalate these problems
and postpone for a later date the need to solve
them in a morally correct manner. Also, in their
long-term action these decisions are to cause
a lot of suffering, disappointments and evil for
people whom they are to affect. One amongst
examples of such immoral decisions, which
I explained relatively comprehensively in items
#A1, #B5 and #F3 from my web page named
solar.htm,
are currently made decisions of building the battery
deprived (grid tie) domestic systems for solar generation
of electricity (i.e. from the energy of sun directly to
the grid via PV panels but without the use of batteries).
Of course, some readers may doubt whether the
indicated above examples of human actions are
outcomes of immoral decisions and implementations.
In the case of marriages caused by desires rather
than by kinships of souls, and in the case of wars,
their immorality is obvious. This fact is confirmed
NOT only by the content of the Bible, but practically
almost every indicator of moral correctness presented
in this item and in item #J2 from this web page. Also
in matter of money printing, both the whispers of our
conscience, as well as the characteristics of such activities
described in item #G2 of this web page, confirm also that it
is an immoral decision and implementation. One can, however, still
have doubts as to whether decisions about the implementation
of pesticides and antibiotics were also immoral, or whether
it was immoral for example, to make the decision to implement
the theory of relativity to teaching and to canons of physics -
discussed in more detail in item #H3 from the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm.
It turns out that YES, indeed, all these decisions were immoral -
which fact in the best way is documented, among others, by the
described above differences between the short-term (immediate)
and long-term consequences of morally correct decisions and
immoral decisions. For example, if someone studies the history
of inventions and the first implementations of pesticides (DDT)
and antibiotics (penicillin), or the history of any other immoral
decision - for example, the history of the theory of relativity,
then he or she discovers that they came easily for their creators
and without the required work and effort - e.g. on the occasion of
some other research, or - as in the case of the theory of relativity,
because increasingly more facts seem to indicate that the
formulation and writing of this theory was made by Einstein's
first wife, NOT by Einstein himself - for details see e.g. the article
427621 in www.technologyreview.com entitled
427621/did einsteins first wife secretly coauthor his 1905 relativity paper/,
which I had pleasure to read in July 2014. (Einstein himself
was known as NOT belonging to "workoholics". For example,
his article of 1905 entitled "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend
Upon Its Energy Content?", discussing consequences of the
theory of relativity, had the length of ... almost 2 pages - see
the caption under "Fig. #G2c" from the web page named
evil.htm.
Also, until today the formal derivation of the famous equation
"E = m c square" cannot be found somehow in Einstein's
publications - is it possible that his first wife withhold this
key derivation as her proof who is the true author of the
theory of relativity?) In addition, all of these decisions brought
for their creators an immediate recognition, fame, and financial
benefits - in the examples described herein - including the
Nobel Prizes. Finally, in their long-term work, all of them already
today revealed consequences of adverse side effects that turned
them into the exact negation of the goals for which those decisions
were originally made (i.e. revealed, amongst others, consequences
of the work of side effects indicated in the previous paragraph).
The official science has this to itself, that it is very
stubborn in committing immorality, and already
absolutely unable to accept the lessons given to it
by the history - which attributes of the science I try to
emphasize in item #C4.7 from my web page named
morals.htm.
It is therefore a high probability, that similar immoralities
that it already has committed with antibiotics, pesticides
and with the theory of relativity, the official science is to
commit again in the future with human accomplishments
that in case of being implemented immorally also have
the potential to become similar "curses of mankind".
Therefore, I would like to warn here, that it is already
known "what" and "why" may also soon become the
next such "curses of mankind" - if these are treated
in as immoral and as messy way as antibiotics, pesticides
and the theory of relativity. And so, these are: (1)
Genetic engineering (GE) - which becomes a "curse
of humanity" if sloppy and careless scientists produce
and unleash a wind-pollinated GE organism, which turns
out to be highly harmful and which taking back under
control will turn out to be impossible. (Notice that such
careless release of GE organisms, including GE maize,
had already taken place on several occasions, eg. in NZ -
this is why I would recommend that NZ and Australia is to
be declared by UN the "GE free zone" before is too late.)
(2) Telekinesis - it has the potential to become a
serious problem if the humanity does not appoint an explicit
"telekinesis free zone" (TFZ) prior to the introduction
telekinesis into general use. This is because in the event
of the spread of telekinesis all over the Earth, there will
be no comparative area with which one could compare
the consequences of its widespread use. Therefore, as
the discoverer of "telekinesis" I have decided to declare
the "telekinesis free zone", as described on the web page
tfz.htm -
after all, virtually everything can be done in a moral or
in an immoral way. However, from the resistance which
the "moral field" has been creating for the completion of
telekinetic devices, it can be deduced that in typical cases
the implementation of telekinesis is to be the morally correct
decision and action - although probably in the future there
will be also cases that someone starts to use telekinesis
in immoral ways (the irreparable harmfulness of which use
is to prevent the precise laying down my "telekinesis free
zone"). (3) Time vehicles - their construction on
Earth opens for people the opportunity to realize the so-called
"imprisoned immortality", involving the repetitive shifting
of people to the days of their youth as soon as they reach
their old age. Unfortunately, if there is NOT introduced
the requirement which will be implemented with the "iron
consequence", that every shifting back in time to years of
one's youth can only be done to people who already have
accomplished a continuous state of the so-called
"totaliztic nirvana",
then the cumulative increase on Earth numbers of
"grumpy old people" entered into bodies of young humans
will create a social climate on Earth which under the name
of "everlasting hell" is described in item #H3 from
my web page named
immortality.htm.
In that social climate, practically all the inhabitants of the
Earth would agonize each other and constantly make
themselves as unhappy as if they lived in the real hell.
Procedures for mental making morally correct decisions
are essential components of the recommendations
of totalizm. Therefore, they are well explained
in a number of totaliztic publications. For example,
a simple and fast method of making morally correct
decisions in our everyday activities, is also discussed
in item #A2.1 from the web page named
totalizm.htm.
In turn, e.g. the evaluation and prediction of consequences
of any human decision or action, through checking whether
the moral field helps or hampers its mental selecting and
later physical implementation, is explained in
item #F1 yet another web page named
rok_uk.htm.
Furthermore, an example of making one such a morally
correct decision, is discussed in item #N4 below on this
web page.
(a)
(b)
Fig. #J1ab: The symbol (seal) of morality and the
obedience to moral requirements - means the logo of the
philosophy of totalizm.
Totalizm is currently the most moral out of all modern,
human-formulated philosophies in existence on Earth.
(But notice that totalizm recognises the moral superiority of the
content of the Bible -
towards scientific explanation of which should strive the
findings of every human-formulated philosophy based
on empirical evidence and on logical deductions - see
the caption under "Fig. #A1" above on this web page.)
Everyone who willingly places this logo on his/her writing,
or who carries the logo of totalizm, has the moral duty
to maintain the pedantical obedience of own words,
attitudes and actions with the content of the Bible
and with scientific findings of the philosophy of totalizm.
(Of course, this moral duty is unable to scare fraudsters
of various kinds from abusing this logo - similarly like
institutions which print money, as well as human laws,
are unable to prevent these money from being
counterfeited e.g. by criminals.) It is this logo
(i.e. the symbol of morality and obedience
to moral requirements) that I wanted to print (stamp)
next to my name on the voting forms. After all, this symbol
(stamp) would let to know voters, that by voting for me, in fact they
would choose for their representative in parlament a person
who NOT only developed the most moral currently philosophy
on Earth, but who also strives to live by recommendations and
requirements of this philosophy. Unfortunately, I already have
learned, that according to the present electoral law of New
Zealand, on the election forms cannot appear any logo by
names of "independent" candidates. The right to place a
logo with their names have only candidates from political
parties - which fact in an obvious way gives an advantage
to the candidates from political parties over the "independent"
candidates. (Click on the above illustration or photograph
to see it enlarged.)
As perhaps the reader already knows, totalizm is currently
the most popular and the most fast growing and fast developing
modern philosophy. Some followers estimate, that only in Poland
totalizm already have more people practicing and sympathizing
with it, than the entire population of New Zealand. It is also
increasingly widely learned outside of Poland, in this number
also in NZ. Thus, a proportion of voters from the "Hutt
South", who are familiar with the philosophy
of totalizm, or who even practice this philosophy
in their lives, is already aware of the ideas that
this logo represents. After all, the logo of totalizm
occurs in almost all websites and publications
of totalizm. Thus, if someone types into a search
engine e.g. such keywords as
totalizm Jan Pajak,
then on most of web pages that will be indicated,
he or she finds this logo. However, the problem
lies in the fact, that in the world live many people
named Jan Pajak. Thus, seeing just the name Jan Pajak
on the ballot forms during the election, even those
voters who already practice totalizm, will NOT know
that the name they have in front of them, has a
direct relationship with the philosophy of totalizm.
Therefore, on March 26, 2014, I officially asked
the NZ Electoral Commission, whether under
the current electoral law, there is a possibility that
on ballot forms, by my name is also printed the
logo of totalizm. (About this my official inquiry,
and about NO answers that it received, I am
writing also in (2014/3/27) from item #M2 of this
web page.) After all, it can be perceived as a kind
of injustice and an open favouring of party candidates,
when the election commission cannot allow me
to print this logo on ballot forms next to my name,
while it is customary that on these forms are printed
party logos to which candidates from political parties
are belonging.
Fig. #J1a (top):
Here is how looks like the symbol (seal) of morality
and the obedience to moral requirements - means
looks the logo of totalizm. This logo displays many
rather extraordinary attributes - which I described
in subsection H1 from volume 5 of my
monograph [8] entitled "Totalizm".
Someone also carried out anonymous research on
attributes of this logo, while the obtained results are
published on the Polish web page from the address
logototalizm.w.interia.pl.
Notice, that in order to allow voters to visually link
my candidacy with the philosophy of totalizm - which
is based on the criteria of morality, the flyers (posters)
from "Fig. #A1" and "Fig. #M1" are stamped with this symbol of morality.
From what I have heard, it was up to elections of 2011,
that independent candidates were allowed to use logos
under which they conducted their campaigns and
which then were printed on the ballot forms for voting.
I planned that in my current campaign I will stamp with
the above logo of totalizm. Unfortunately, during the
registration of my interest I discovered, that a law
is just being prepared, that in 2014 election "independent"
candidates are NOT going to be assigned to any logo
printed by their name on ballot forms for voting -
which would assist voters in identifying candidates
visually and in associating them with the election
campaign that they carried out under given logo.
From 2014 the visual identifying on the form
for voting, via a logo, will be allowed in NZ only
to candidates nominated by political parties.
As, according to my research on the so-called
"omniplan"
described in items #C3, #C4 and #C4.1 from the web page
immortality.htm,
virtually everything that happens on Earth actually
comes from God, I try to work out the meaning that
has this convergence of the ban on the use of logos by
"independent", with my decision to put my candidacy
for vote, and also to work out what relationship this
convergence has with the divine educational method,
which under the name of the
"principle of reversals"
is described in item #F3 from my web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm.
Fig. #J1b (down):
Here is one amongst numerous illustrations which someone
other than myself disseminated in the Internet, and
which documents, that in minds
of people who practice totalizm, who sympathize with
this philosophy, or who try to criticise it, logo of totalizm is
inseparately linked to me. The above illustration
shows my photograph, which some anonymous "artist"
additionally altered and then published in the Internet.
He composed it in such a manner, that it added
me attributes of a television or movie-film "hero".
Amongst others, this "artist" added to my photograph
the logo of totalizm visible on my chest. (In the real
life, so far I tried to behave humbly, thus I did NOT
wear the logo of totalizm on my chest - however,
I may reconsider this matter for the purpose of my
election campaign.)
It is worth to add here, that the work of "moral field",
described, amongst others, in item #J1 and in "part #N"
of this web page, causes that someone other than
myself published in Internet a number of my images
laboriously composed in the manner similar to the
above. So in order these laboriously composed
pieces of art of this anonymous "artist" do NOT get
lost and forgotten, the most interesting amongst them
I decided to reproduce in my web pages and publications
(after all, they had NO "copyrights" attached to them).
Thus, if the reader wishes, then reproductions of
so altered my images can view, e.g. on "Fig. #J3" from
god_proof.htm,
on "Fig. #M1" from the web page named
telekinesis.htm,
or on "Fig. #A4" from volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
#J2.
Procedures, methods and criteria of totalizm that help to make morally correct decisions and implementations:
The
philosophy of totalizm
imposes on people who practice it just one requirement,
namely "whatever you do, always
do it in a pedantically moral manner". The point
is, that if our choices and decisions fulfil the strict moral
requirements and criteria, then the long-term consequences
of these decisions and actions really solve the problems
for the solving of which they were originally taken.
(But notice from the previous item #J1, that immoral
decisions and actions newer truly solve any problem.)
Thus, if e.g. a person which practices totalizm gives a
favour to someone, then in reality this favour really turns
out to be a "true favour", NOT just a "bear's favour".
The general procedure recommended by totalizm
for making and implementing morally correct decisions,
is illustrated on the example from item #N4 of this
web page. It depends on (1) finding all possible
decisions that lie in our capabilities and that allow
to solve the problem that we currently confront,
and then (2) selecting from all these decisions
just the one, which is characterized by the steepest
climbing uphill in the moral field. Of course, the
whole art of implementing this procedure, and
thus acting as a totalizt, involves skills of determining
as early as possible whether this one decision
that we have chosen for the implementation, actually
fulfils the strict criteria of morality - while if it does
NOT fulfil these moral criteria, then it involves skills
of such transforming this decision that it is to fulfil
the criteria of morality.
Totalizm
is quite a well developed philosophy, which indicates
to users a number of tools and methods of action,
that allow them to verify fast whether an intended
decision and its implementation fulfils the criteria
of morality, while if it does NOT fulfil these criteria,
then these tools and methods allow to change the
decision and its implementation into a different one
that is to fulfil the criteria. I am NOT going to repeat
here these tools and methods, but just indicate where
they are described well. After all, if the reader wishes
so, then he or she can look in there and learn these
tools and methods. So here are links to descriptions
of most important amongst them:
(A)
The so-called "indicators of moral correctness".
Similarly as religions use ideas of "sins" and "good deeds",
also totalizm uses a number of so-called "indicators
of moral correctness". These indicators quite quickly
and clearly indicate whether given intended actions
meet the criteria of morality. Briefly these indicators are
described in items #C4 to #C4.6 from my web page named
morals.htm,
while some of them are also discussed in item #B1 of the web page
changelings.htm.
Examples of these indicators include "text of the Bible",
"our organ of conscience", "moral field", "moral energy",
"moral laws", "karma", and several others.
(B)
Principles of totaliztic acting in specific life situations.
These are described in items #A2 to #A2.10 from my web page named
totalizm.htm.
Their example can be the only request of totalizm, that
in everything that we do, especially in the decisive life
situations, we should always act pedantically moral and
thus always climb uphill in the "moral field" - means we
should choose solutions which runs opposite to the
so-called "line of the least intellectual resistance".
In turn, this line is very easy to find in real life situations.
After all, the location of it is indicated by immediate benefits
from immoral acting - means the lack of effort, instant
pleasures, the instant recognition of other people, "saving
the face", etc. So this "line of the least intellectual resistance"
persuades us to do whatever is least troublesome in a
given situation, what consumes the least of our effort,
what is the most pleasant, what brings to us the instant
recognition of other people, etc. - means everything that
is illustrated by most promoted and fashionable modern
films, by television advertisements, by actions of wealthy
people and politicians, etc.
The philosophy of totalizm recommends also, that
if as late as during implementation of a given decision,
we discover that this decision is immoral, than we
should "abandon the implementation of the
decision which turned out to be immoral because
it is bringing to us instant benefits, then change
this decision into a decision which is to bring us
long-term benefits". After all, immoral decisions
never solve any real problem - as this is explained
in previous item #J1 from this web page. They only
postpone the solving of this problem for a future time,
at the cost of additional need to solve a number of
other problems that are to appear later because of
the undesirable side effects of these immoral decisions
are implementations. This recommendation of abandoning
such immoral decisions stems from the mutual contradiction
of short-term and long-term consequences of work of
moral field. Namely, if some of our acting already in
the process of its implementation turns out to be easy,
enjoyable, and bringing us immediate benefits, then
the principle on which the moral field works, makes
certain for us, that long-term consequences of
this acting are to reveal numerous undesirable
side-effects and will prove to be highly detrimental
for us. Thus totalizm recommends to abandon such
short-term-beneficial acting and instead of it choose
acting which in short-term turns difficult, but which
promises various long-term benefits. For example,
if the described in #J1 and in (5) from item #D5 of
this web page (while commented more thoroughly
in #H3 from the web page
mozajski_uk.htm)
creators of the first atomic bomb and the inventor
of pesticides-DDT and antibiotic-penicillin,
abandoned their efforts and implementations -
as this is recommended by the web page named
tfz.htm,
then neither today, nor in the future, people should have
to live in a constant danger and fear caused by
long-term detrimental consequences of those efforts,
nor the humanity would have only now seek more
moral solutions, which after the abandoning of
those past efforts would probably have been found
a long time ago. In addition, the humanity would
be spared from the present need to repair damages
which the undesirable side effects of these decisions
caused, means would be released from e.g. the need
to heal illnesses caused by radioactive isotopes, pesticides,
and antibiotics-resistant bacteria. (Unfortunately, the
decision to implement this recommendation of totalizm
turns out to be extremely difficult for making in typical
life situations, as it requires extraordinary faith
and trust.)
(C)
Test for the fulfilment of criteria of morality. These
tests, utilising the so-called "categorising attributes",
are described, amongst others, in subsection JA5.3
from volume 6 of my newest
monograph [1/5],
while illustrated in action (on the example of logical analysis
of the duty to defend ourselves - e.g. in situations of "you or
me" type) in subsection JD11.1 from volume 7 of that
monograph [1/5]. They depend on answering "YES" or
"NO" to a series of questions concerning consequences
of the action that we are testing.
An extremely vital attribute of all indicated above
tools and methods for moral categorising of human
actions, is that they all are mutually consistent,
means that all of them fulfil the so-called
"principle of unanimity"
described briefly, amongst others,
in item #D5 from the web page named
morals.htm,
while explained more extensively in subsection
JA13 from volume 6 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
This principle causes, that all such tools and methods
unanimously qualify a given human action
always to the same category, i.e. always either all of
them indicate, that this action is "moral" (means that it
fulfils criteria of morality), or all of them indicate, that
this action is "immoral" (means that it breaks criteria
of morality). The existence and work of this "principle
of unanimity" for tools and methods of totalizm causes,
that every person who practices totalizm has a choice
of a number of tools and methods which can be used
in everyday life. So if for some reasons someone does
NOT feel confident in qualifying human actions with one
of them (e.g. in qualifying their fulfilment by matching
text of the Bible, because e.g. this person is NOT enough familiar
with the Bible to be able to use it in every place and in
every moment of time of the everyday life), then he or
she can with an equal accuracy use other amongst these
tools and methods - i.e. the one which is most handy
or convenient for him or her. In addition, whenever
someone is NOT sure whether he or she can rely on
outcome of checking of a given action with one of these
tools or methods, then he or she can additionally use
another of them, or even several of them, to get sure,
whether a given action is moral or immoral.
I personally believe, that in case I win elections, then
on one hand I would continually apply and test in situations
from the real life, and if necessary - also improve, the tools
and methods that totalizm already developed and already
relies on. On the other hand, I would probably develop a few
further such tools and methods, which would immediately
be checked and applied in action in circumstances of
parliamentary debates.
#J3.
What according to totalizm should be done when a single
obstacle is encountered that exceeds our capability to overcome:
Motto:
"Totalizm
recommends that when you encounter an obstacle
that is greater than your capability of overcoming,
then you should NOT try to overcome it, but behave
like water - i.e. circumnavigate around it."
One of the features of morally correct action
is that it always moves uphill in the so-called
"moral field". In turn this moral field causes,
that practically the
more moral is what we do, the greater the
resistance it encounters and the more effort
we need to put into the implementation of it.
Often this resistance of the moral field manifests
itself in e.g. the form of other people trying to
stop us from completing whatever we intend
to do. Of course, when these people are more
powerful than we are, then obstacles which
they place on our path can be impossible to
overcome. So should these obstacles stop
us? Totalizm say that NO. If we act morally,
and we notice that only people (i.e. NOT God)
are trying to stop us, then we should keep
going. In this item I am to explain what totalizm
recommend to us that we do when we encounter
a powerful obstruction that completely blocks
the further progress in our actions.
The best illustrative explanation of the recommendation
of totalizm for cases of encountering an obstacle
which is extremely difficult to overcome, is the
motto of this item. Namely, "when
you encounter an obstacle that exceeds your capability
to overcome, then encircle (circumnavigate) around it".
This is because if you tried to overcome it, then the
powerful people who placed this obstacle on your
path can destroy you, or you eventually destroy
yourself through your own fruitless efforts. However,
to help us in such cases, God has adopted a method
of action which can be described, that if
on someone's morally correct path a powerful obstacle
is placed, then God secretly prepares especially for
that someone a well-hidden morally correct road,
by following which it will be possible to walk around
this obstacle. Only that in order to find
this secret road around obstacles, one has to put
in a lot of own effort, thoughts, and searches.
But in searches for it, an additional clue is provided,
which allows for a faster discovery of it. Namely,
these roads around powerful obstacles always
meet all criteria of morality. Thus, when searching
for them, one should go (start) from these moral
criteria, means one should omit all own prejudices
held, habits, pride, old friends' networks, seeking
of profits, etc.
A good example of an obstacle and the moral road
to circumvent around it, are the "intentions" of the
designer of the stadium in Petone described
in "part #I" of this web page, and the project of
a "workshop for inventors" described in item #D1
from this web page. Namely, the "intentions" of
the designer of the stadium in Petone would be
met fuller, better, and more morally, if instead
of the stadium the same designer decided to
build in Petone such a "workshop for inventors".
(We should NOT confuse here the "intentions"
of the designer, with the "stadium", because
the "intentions" describe the goals that the
designer is trying to achieve, while the "stadium"
describes only one of many possible paths to
fulfil these intentions.) At the same time, in the
implementation of intentions of the designer,
this workshop would walk around obstacles,
means around people who are to do everything
in their power to NOT allow the stadium is built
in Petone.
Details of the method described here "to circumnavigate
around obstacles" are further discussed under the
name of the "law of
a highway through a sea" in (#6A)
from subsection I4.1.1 in volume 5 of my newest
monograph [1/5],
while briefly it is summarised in item #A2.4 from the web page
totalizm.htm.
(The reason for which I called the "law of a
highway through a sea" this creation by God
of secret roads for moral circumnavigating of obstacles,
is that these roads often turn out to be so unexpected,
that for me personally they resemble the described
in the Bible formation for Moses the dry pathway
through the Red Sea.)
Part #K:
What raises my greatest fears for the future:
#K1.
We need to protect New Zealand from
experiencing the fate of many other nations:
In item #G2 of this web page I explained, that
from a possible social problems, New Zealand
is only separated by just a significant disaster,
freak weather, year of crops failure, etc. This
is because the society which is already stretched,
have no room for further accommodating -
even if it is pushed by mechanisms of nature.
In turn, once any problems are started, then we all
are to suffer and all are to loose. Thus, much better
is to voluntarily initiate preventive reforms, than
to allow that events get out of hand. So in order
to protect the population of this wonderful country
against consequences of a disaster, it is
desirable to start appropriate precautionary
reforms already now. Unfortunately, as so
far, there is no sign of anyone who would be
willing to design and to implement reforms
that are needed. Simultaneously, time may
be running out.
My concern for the future of NZ is exacerbated by
the discovery which I made only during the election
campaign described on this web page. Namely,
this campaign has revealed to me the shocking truth that
the New Zealand MMP electoral system based on so-called "lists" and privileges of political parties,
destroyed the absolutely
indispensable mechanism for self-improvement, which
still existed up to 1993 in the previous FPP system
("first past the post"), and which (mechanism) drives
the long-term effectiveness of every democracy.
As a result of the absence of such a mechanism of
self-improvement, with the elapse of time the MMP
system in NZ becomes more and more entrenched,
detached from reality and avoiding satisfying of real
human needs. In other words, over time the work of
MMP system in New Zealand is increasingly more
conformed to the operation of political systems about
which the history has taught us that just because of
the lack of such mechanisms to improve themselves
and because of the lack of competition, they always
have fallen - typically destroying on the occasion of
these falls nearly all achievements of their nations.
In order the reader could note the absence in NZ
of such a mechanism of self-improvement, it is
sufficient to consider, for example: how effectively
NZ political parties cut themselves from communication
and from consultation with their members and voters,
who actually determines the policies and the course
of political parties - the whim of their leaders or the
needs of their members and voters, whom MPs
adopted from the so-called party "list" actually
serve - their party or the nation, what percentage
of the so-called "election promises" is actually
implemented by the political parties, how many
party MPs receive and listen to their constituents
in offices paid for this purpose by the taxpayers
and in days that they indicated on doors of those
offices, what is the opinion of a "typical passer-by
from NZ street" about the credibility and the good
intentions of their politicians, how difficult political
parties make the admission of non-party competitors
with different views to become MPs and to make
parliamentary decisions, or consider why all the
referendums conducted in NZ under MMP have
been ignored by the party governments, how many
"independent MPs" have a real influence on the
decisions of NZ parliament or government, etc., etc.
Part #L:
The report how progressed the implementation
of goals and intentions that I chose to achieve
in the elections of 2014 described on this web page:
#L1.
Dates of main stages completed during this election
(a detailed report from these stages and events
is provided in items #M2 and #N3 below):
On 10th March 2014 the NZ government announced
the date of elections. On 20th March 2014 I decided
to stand as an Independent candidate for this election.
An official application forms (M40-Nom) for qualifying
as an Independent candidate to elections has been
delivered to me by post on 17 June 2014. After the
completion of this form, and after collecting the
documents attached to the M40-Nom form, I filled
up officially the documents on August 21, 2014. I
was notified of an acceptance as an Independent
candidate on Friday, 29 August 2014. The official
elections for NZ parliament were held on 20th
September 2014 - although already around 2
weeks earlier there was also available a possibility
for an earlier voting.
#L2.
Results of 2014 elections:
Note: The numbers provided below in this item
so-far are the first preliminary data that I have
already managed to collect. These numbers
originate either from my personal watching in
TV of summaries of votes counting, or from the
website with preliminary results of the elections
available at the web page electionresults_2014/electorate-17.html
at the web site from the address
www.electionresults.govt.nz/.
This means that, after further searches and after
finding more accurate sources of data, these numbers
may be subjected to a slight change and clarification.
In the electorate Hutt South as many as 34,699
people have voted in 2014 elections to the NZ
parliament. (In 2011 this electorate had 42,139
registered voters - the number of voters in 2014
so far is NOT known to me.) In Hutt South the
election won Trevor Mallard (from the party
"Labour"). He received 15,049 votes - that is he
won with a majority of 373 votes over the next
candidate. He was re-elected in Hutt South for
the seventh time in turn, while he serves as a
member of the NZ parliament since 1984, means
for nine previous terms in office as a NZ MP -
but NOT always as a representative of Hutt
South. (The current term will be his 10th in
office - which number of three-year terms in
office also looks similar for a significant proportion
of other members of present NZ parliament
who won this election.)
Other candidates from Hutt South, who this time
have NOT been elected to NZ parliament by voters
(although some of them may be included into the
parliament by being adopted from the "list" by their
political parties), received the following numbers
of votes. Chris Bishop (representing the ruling
party "National" - and thus still adopted into the
NZ parliament from the "list" of his party) - received
14,671 votes. Holly Walker (representing the party
"Greens" - hence probably she also will be adopted
as an MP from the "list" of her party) - received
2,693 votes. Mataroa Paroro ("New Zealand First") -
received 912 votes. Gordon Copeland ("Conservative") -
received 776 votes. Grae O'Sullivan ("ACT") - received
161 votes. Jan Pajak ("Independent" - that is me) -
received 103 votes. Dave Stonyer ("United Future") -
received 96 votes.
Taking the opportunity of
this summary of results, on behalf of myself and
also on behalf of supporters of the philosophy of
totalizm, I would like to thank all these
voters from Hutt South, who trusted my knowledge,
experience and the programme of reforms,
and thus who persevered in their decision to
vote for me in this election. I would
also like to reassure them here that they can now
be confident that they did what was required and
right in the situation that occurred. I personally
believe that I spoke to the majority of them during
rounds of my campaign from a door to a door.
I still remember the content of these conversations
and highly appreciate their inspirational value.
(Notice, that to avoid
repeating twice the same work, I am awaiting
with the translation of the rest of this item from the
Polish language
into English util the time when the counting of special
votes is to be completed. Thus, for the complete
picture please visit this item again after some time.
In the meantime you may find some details that you need in the
Polish version of this web page.)
Fig. #L1. Here is an example of posters that advertised NZ
political parties participating in the elections of 2014 and
that advertised candidates from those parties. The print
and instalment of each of these posters, depending on
its size and quality, costs from about $NZ 500, to about
$NZ 1000. A long rows of such posters were placed
before the election along each entry and exit road in
practically all towns of Hutt South, and often also
on streets within these towns - what probably must cost
millions. In addition to these posters, political parties
and their candidates advertised themselves in paid
ads from newspapers, on television, and in meetings
and breakfasts with voters, as well as with the use of
flyers, leaflets and advertising materials distributed on
the streets, parkings, public areas and delivered to
mailboxes of all households of the electorate by
mail or by special advertising agencies, through
letters sent by mail to individual voters, and in many
other ways. In total, each political party could officially
spend for the campaign even over a million NZ dollars,
while each of their candidates could spend further
up to $NZ 25,700.
I personally spent zero dollars on this campaign -
as I declared it in item #D2 of this web page. So if
my expenses and my achievement of 103 votes
are compared with the expenditure and achievements
of other candidates for the election described here,
then my zero-dollar campaign
of 2014 proved to be a huge success.
This success would NOT be possible without the
determination of those 103 voters, that despite
of everything still voted for me - once again
I sincerely thank them for their vote.
#L3.
Conclusions that eventuated from my participation in 2014 elections:
(Sorry, but this item still awaits to be translated from Polish -
in the meantime you can read it in the
Polish version of this web page.)
Part #M:
Summary of already achieved empirical
experiences and achievements from the
election of 2014, that concern the democratic
process (for the summary of philosophical
findings - see "Part #P" below):
#M1.
Our experiences are like historic events - if they are
NOT written down, then they quickly are forgotten:
I hereby write down my experiences with the
election campaign of 2014. This allows on one
hand to NOT forget whatever turned out to be
most important out of events of this campaign.
On the other hand, this also gives chances
to other people to learn from my experiences
described here and available for everyone.
#M2.
Timeline of my efforts - i.e. what and when
in the matters described on this web page
I already managed to learn, to experience,
to try out, etc.:
This is the history of my efforts, with emphases
on listing from 20th March 2014 onwards, until
the present moment (i.e. until the date when I
most recently updated this web page), of what
I have learned, met, experienced empirically
(practically), etc.:
(2014/3/10)
Announcement of the election date in NZ. It is Monday evening
on 3rd March 2014, and in the news on TV the leader of NZ, i.e. the
New Zealand "Prime Minister" (PM), announces the date of elections
to NZ Parliament. This date of election is to be Saturday, 20th September
2014. Hearing this date I accept it indifferently - as if it is yet another
information, with streams which we are inundated recently. I do NOT
have yet even the slightest idea that the development of situation in
Petone described in "part #I" of this web page, after just 10 days is
to force me to make the decision to stand for this election and then
it is to keep me frantically busy for the period of next six months.
(2014/3/20)
The making of decision to stand for election and completing
preliminary checks - for example, the checking whether I fulfil
the requirements, estimation of costs, planning of activities, getting
to know the addresses of institutions related to elections , etc.
(2014/3/21)
The learning of formalities and dates, as well as registering as a
candidate in the Election Commission (just for forms-sending
purpose only). I mean, the learning of the kind of paperwork and
fees that are required to qualify as an "independent" candidate for
the elections. I also included my name to the list of persons wishing
to apply for eligibility to the list of election candidates - so that
appropriate application forms could be send to me when they
are printed. I also learned that, in accordance with New Zealand
law, from 20 August to 26 August 2014 will be open only a one-week
interval in which all applicants may submit applications and required
documents to be qualified to the list of candidates for the election.
So in order to complete the required formalities, everything that
is needed I must have prepared in advance, before the arrival of
that date.
(2014/3/22)
Initiation of the writing of the Polish language version of this web
page. This web page was a natural consequence of the
registration of my intention to stand in this election. The web
page was ready for publishing on 25th of March 2014.
(2014/3/22)
First conversations with prospective voters - concentrating on the
problem of stadium described in "part #I" of this web page. In these
conversations struck me several facts, the most important of which
in my opinion were manifestations of a special apathy, helplessness
and resignation in prospective voters. These were expressed to
me in various words but through the common belief that
"there is NO point to try to fix
or to change anything, because what people in power or
in money want to do, they will do it anyway - no matter
how hard we would try to remedy the situation". That
apathy and resignation regarding the effectiveness of the democratic
process in NZ requires my more thorough research, while the
conclusions from this my research I describe in item #P2 below
on this web page. After all, the validity of these conclusions goes
far beyond the realm of elections and has various philosophical
implications. In turn, for my election efforts the most important
implication of this finding is that in
fact I have quite a realistic chance of winning in these
(or in next) election with even an experienced and respected
politician, because the feeling of powerlessness and resignation
that voters demonstrate, is a proof that they do NOT believe
in good intentions and in clout of the Members of Parliament
who currently represent them, and thus these voters are willing
to vote for any candidate which is to empirically demonstrate
for them that he found the mechanism by which he can enforce
positive reforms which most people want. So the
only thing I need to do to win the election, is to empirically
demonstrate to voters that I found such a mechanism for the
effective implementation of their democratic wishes, and that
I am able to use this mechanism.
(2014/3/25)
The publication of the first Polish-language version of this web page,
and letting to know my followers about my intention to stand in
these elections. Please be noted, that in the first phase of my
actions, every spare moment I spent perfecting this web page, so
that the first version of it was NOT yet as informative as this one.
(2014/3/25-6)
The first response to this my web page - the proposal for myelection poster. I was touched
by the speed of the reaction. One reader volunteered to organize
an easy to remember domain for my election web page, and he
also designed for me an election poster. A version of the design
for this poster is shown on "Fig #A1" from the beginning of this
web page. I would be very obliged to readers who examine it,
for sending me their comments and opinions about this poster
(my email addresses are given item #R6 below) - for example,
whether they consider short slogans from this poster reflecting
well enough my electoral intentions that I listed in item #D1
of this web page, whether the poster is sufficiently informative
and convincing, what they would suggest to change or improve,
etc. Readers with artistic abilities I also encourage to design
their own poster for the election (gratis (for free) only - because
my campaign is to be a "zero-dollar" one, hence I will NOT be
able to pay anyone, or to return costs of anyone).
(2014/3/26)
A visit to the office of the current Member of Parliament (MP) from
our electorate "Hutt South". This MP has an office in Petone,
on the door of which is indicated that it is open every Wednesday
9:30 am to 4 pm. (According to information on the so-called "MP
signage", given in the brochure [1#M2] - which explains
the rights and responsibilities of candidates for the elections, the
cost of maintaining this office is covered from taxes. The brochure,
prepared in the safe PDF format, is available at the internet address
www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/final_handbook_-_candidate_feb_2014.pdf.
It is worth looking at, as it also includes all other important information
about the election for which I intend to put my candidacy.)
Since the date of 26th March 2014 just falls on Wednesday, I went
to his office in order to introduce myself to the current member, shake
his hand, give him the assurance of my respect, personally inform
him as the first that I am going to compete with him in the
upcoming elections, and to remind him that if
due to some miracle this MP has lost the election to me, then for
him this would NOT make any difference, as by being a high-ranking
on the list of activists of his political party, the MMP electoral system
prevailing in New Zealand, would ensure that he will be taken to
parliament by his party, even if he loses the election.
For some reason I have since childhood such a habit, a tradition,
or a compulsion, that I personally honour the opponent, the competing
with whom I face, and I give him the assurance of my respect,
as well as I try to be the first who personally informs him about
my intentions and reasons. (In the course of my university studies
occurred an event which seemed to explain the origin of this strange
habit. Namely, during the spiritual session, in which I participated
for fun as a student, one of the ghosts come and had claimed that
I was once the commander of the expedition of knights and I was
killed in a duel by him. A more detailed description of this ghost
calling session, is provided in item #J1 from my web page named
malbork_uk.htm.
In turn, it is known that the "knight
tradition of honourable conduct" caused, that before
knights' duel began, they firstly saluted each other and passed on
compliments to each other.) Unfortunately, my visit to the office
of our Member of Parliament once again proved to be a disappointment.
He was not in the office, and his very nice and accommodating
employee that was just there on duty informed me that a meeting
with the MP could be arranged for me only about the beginning
of September - because before this date the MP is very busy.
Because since the time when I arrived to Petone in 2001, it was
the third my visit to the office of the MP in the date and time
which according to the information on the door he supposed
to be present in his office, but during every of these three visits
he was NOT present there, it gives me a lot to think about. After
all, his chronic absence in days and times designated by him
to meet with his constituents in the office whose existence voters
pay and maintain with their taxes, means practically that the
MP has either NOT intend to, or is unable to, actually represent
their constituents and to consult their problems. So the question
which arises due to this fact, whether it is a sign of the syndrome
of the "old broom that has already stopped sweeping well",
or a sign of even a deeper problem of democracy - for example,
a sign that "democracy the accountability of which has ceased
to be continually tested by the voters, no longer is a democracy"?
(2014/3/26)
The discovery of the phenomenon, which introduces a serious
impediment to my plans for the election campaign. Namely a
phenomenon, that in spite in the window
I can see that someone is present at home, still in a significant
proportion of houses no-one opens the door when I knock to
talk with members of the household (probably because they
already noticed through the window that they do NOT know
the knocking person). I wonder whether this phenomenon
is a consequence of what is described in item #A2 of this web
page? For if YES, then this would mean that currently a "vicious
circle", has already closed, as without meeting with candidates
for elections these voters are unable to properly select and vote
for the candidate who wants to improve their situation, while
without a vote for the right candidate their situation will NOT improve.
(2014/3/27)
Emailing to the Election Commission my official inquiry, whether
due to the long-term relationship of my person and my name with
the "logo of totalizm" shown in "Fig #L1" above on this web page,
there is a possibility that this logo could be printed together with
my name on voting ballots forms - similarly as on these forms
are printed logos of political parties to which party candidates
belong. My inquiry was motivated by the fact, that since
for the candidates from political parties logos of their parties
are printed with their names, then it would be an injustice if
with my name is NOT printed the logo which for many years
is associated with my accomplishments in life and which,
because of the Internet, probably is also known visually to
a proportion of voters from the electorate "Hutt South".
The answer to this question arrived on 2014/4/1.
It was unsuccessful for me. It turns out that the new
law "The Electoral Amendment Act", approved by
the Queen on 24 March 2014, allows that only political
parties have approved logo, that is printed on the
voting ballots forms.
(2014/3/28)
The purchase from a New Zealand company 24/7 the hosting
for (this) my election campaign web page. (This purchase
was done and paid by the helpful reader who also designed
the flyers shown in "Fig. #A1" and "Fig. #M1"). To this
company 24/7 was also passed the Internet domain www.pajak.org.nz to
be implemented for use on their server. (This helpful reader
also bought and registered the domain www.pajak.org.nz
already sometime earlier, and he included this domain into
the flyers shown in "Fig. #A1" and "Fig. #M1".) For me, the
interesting question was how much time it is to take to
implement in NZ a newly purchased domain, because it is
known to me that in Europe and in US hosting plans typically
make such implementation in a matter of minutes,
and in the worst case, within a few hours of time.
Time, after all, is of an essence for me, because
on it depend the results of my election campaign.
The making available for my use of the already working
hosting with my election domain and with the Internet
address www.pajak.org.nz has occurred on 2014/4/1 -
that is, after four days. The hosting offered to me also
the election email of the address drjan@pajak.org.nz.
(2014/4/1)
Uploading my election web page (the Polish language
version only) onto the hosting with my election domain
www.pajak.org.nz,
and testing the operation of this domain and my email
drjan@pajak.org.nz. The testing yielded positive results.
Hence the domain organized for me by the reader supporting
my actions (i.e. by the author of poster from "Fig. #A1") is
already running and started to work for the good of election
described here.
(2014/4/1)
Starting the translation of this my election web page into
English. I finished this translation on Monday, 7th April 2014,
and immediately uploaded the web page on
www.pajak.org.nz.
Of course, my work on this web page has NOT finished at the
moment of publishing it, but it still is to continue, as I must
repetitively update and improve it.
(2014/4/15)
Designating almost the entire day for walking from house to
house, and for talking to voters. So far, for these home-calls
I spent casually just a few hours a day and only in the days and
hours when it was NOT raining too hard. For several last days the
entire New Zealand was in fact constantly poured by abundant
rains, which rains (as some people joke) supposedly came from
England with the royal couple that from 7 to 16 April 2014 visited
their former colony. But Tuesday, 15 April 2014, was the first
and the only day after the publication of the English version of
this web page, when in Petone rain stopped its recent continuous
pouring for the entire day. So it was also the first and only
day that I could devote almost entirely for talking to voters.
During my "rounds" from house to house, I confirmed a
lot of philosophical facts which I noted previously, and some
of which I summarised in (2014/4/15) from item #P2 on this web
page. Talks with voters also confirmed a lot of previous facts
to which voters drew my attention during my previous short
walks - for example, that they feel the burden of repayments
of the "Westpac Stadium" (the one from "Fig. #I1") still so
many years after the stadium was constructed, that if they
are forced to additionally pay for the construction of the
new stadium in Petone, then it will be an open injustice,
that the matter of rates payments is "unfair" as "tax on tax"
is imposed on people - i.e. an additional tax of GST (i.e. the
New Zealand equivalent of VAT - see item #T2 from the web page named
humanity.htm)
is imposed on rates, but rates themselves are also a kind
of tax - means that the tax in form of rates is additionally
increased due to imposing on it another tax in form of GST
(VAT). Voters also drew my attention to the fact that I was
the first candidate for a Member of Parliament since many
years, who actually visited them by waking from house to
house and who personally spoke with voters (which fact
made me very surprised, because such "rounds" and
conversations with voters really "open eyes" and each
candidate for elections should do them).
(2014/4/19)
The information from an article in the newspaper that the town
Naenae from which I started my campaigning has been removed
from the electorate Hutt South. In item #I1 and in "part #J"
of this web page is described the so-called "moral field" with
which God causes that only immoral activities are easy and fun,
while the completion of everything that is moral requires putting
in this completion an effort (F) which is proportional to the number
of people (m) who are to benefit from this moral action, and also
proportional to the amount (a) of these benefits. As I have already
experienced this during the described on this web page my attempts
to join Members of Parliament (MPs) for implementing reforms urgently
needed in NZ, the hindering of my intentions by the moral field
turned out to be extremely strong. Since the first moment of time
when I took my decision in this matter, the moral field started its
relentless pressures that I abandon my intentions. These pressures
are working until today, and they become increasingly powerful.
In fact, they caused that, for the purposes of later studies I began
even systematically report them in the dedicated to them, separate
"part #N" of this web page - after all, they can really teach us
a lot. Here, however, I mention only one of the forms of work
of the moral field, which was then revealed to me. Namely,
when I made the decision to put forward my candidacy for a vote,
none of official election workers could (or wanted) to give me a list
of the townships which belong to the electorate "Hutt South".
They just sent me back and forth for that list from the proverbial
Ajnasz to Caiaphas. I finally decided to laboriously drawn up
such a list by myself through the analyzing of addresses listed
on the prepared in 2013 list of voters from the "Hutt South".
In this way I drawn up my own list and published it in item
#C1 from this web page. Then, from that list I selected the
township of Naenae, to start in it my election campaign.
There was several reasons why I decided to launch my
campaign just in there. For example, because in there
live relatively poor voters, mostly of a working-class origin
(for which charges for the stadium in Petone will be a
serious problem), because it is located relatively far from
Petone, while the winter is coming, etc. My campaign in
this township finished on 15th April 2014. Two days later,
i.e. on 17th April 2014, while reviewing newspapers in the
Petone library I came across the article [2#M2]
entitled "Electoral shakeup could hurt Mallard", from
page A6 of newspaper
The Dominion Post Weekend
(edition from Saturday-Sunday, April 19-20, 2014).
From that article I have learned, that it has just been decided
to remove the town of Naenae from the Hutt South electorate,
and to include it to a different electorate. Thus, all my previous
campaigning went to a waste. Instead of Naenae, to the Hutt
South were incorporated two other localities previously belonging
to Wellington, namely Korokoro and Maungaraki. However,
they both are NOT located in the Hutt Valley, and are inhabited
by relatively wealthy people, hence their voters probably
are NOT going to be interested in problems that I want to
address in my reforms, and perhaps they even may be
against such reforms.
(2014/5/1)
A success in overcoming the illness and in the preparation and
publishing on my blog the information post number #244E with
the adaptation of item #I1 and "Fig. #I1" from this web page.
I run two blogs with mirroring contents, available at following addresses
totalizm.wordpress.com and
www.blox.pl/html.
On these blogs in first days of each month I traditionally
publish for people who follow my research the monthly
information reports explaining outcomes of new research
that I completed in the meantime. Unfortunately, as explained
in (2014/4/22-3) from item #N3 of this web page, on the
night of 22/23 April 2014 I caught a terrible illness (cold
with runny nose, or flu), so that in spite of applying all
healing methods and remedies which were in my disposal,
still until 17 May 2014 my head was spinning, I had runny
nose., I sneezed frequently, and I was coughing quite badly.
Under these conditions, it was rather difficult for me to
concentrate on the preparation of the next entry to my blogs.
However, I bent on myself and the entry was prepared on
time, the Polish version of it being published in both blogs
on 1st May 2014, while the English version being published
on my first blog on 8th May 2014, while on the second blog
it was published on 17th of May 2014. Shockingly, after it
was published, the most unpleasant symptoms of my illness
disappeared strangely fast - thus inducing even more uneasy
questions in my mind. Disappeared my headache, sneezing
and cold, and only a stubborn cough troubled me for another
week. I managed to get rid of this stubborn cough only on 24
May 2014 - by using a radical old-Indian healing recipe which
I described in item #C7 from my web page named
healing.htm.
Unfortunately, a short time after healing it I was infected with
another cough which troubles me practically until today.
Readers are probably wondering why I insisted to prepare
this entry, in spite of experiencing a terrible cold or flu. Well,
the reason are these "2 degrees of separation" which are
explained in "2b" from item #D1 of this web page. Namely,
if I lose in the upcoming elections, the main reason is probably
to be, that potential voters who might vote for me, will NOT
know about my existence. After all, for me it is extremely
difficult to reach with the message of reforms to each voter,
while having only $0 budget for the campaign (see item
#D2 from this web page). Meanwhile, these "2 degrees
of separation" make virtually every inhabitant of New Zealand
to know several people who live in my electorate (i.e. who
live in the area which includes townships listed in item #C1
from this web page). A lot of inhabitants of New Zealand
reads my blogs. So if they read from my blogs that
I am standing for this election, then even if they do
NOT live in my electorate, still on various occasions
they may accidentally hint to their friends from that
electorate, "hey, do you know that in your electorate
stands for this year election the creator of totalizm
about whom I mentioned you the other day".
(2014/6/1)
Publication of the June information post #245E for readers of my
blogs and web pages. That post is an adaptation of item #F5
from this web page. It addresses one of the biggest problems of
the present world, namely the rapid decrease in the level of "moral
energy", and the resulting increase in the number of suicides, mental
depression cases and mental illness. The Polish version of this post
was published on both my blogs on 29 May and 1 June. In turn the
first English version was published on 5 June 2014.
(2014/5/28)
The printing and sending me from Germany to NZ, a gift in the
form of 9,999 copies of election posters from "Fig. # A1", made
by a follower of totalizm who designed this poster. Due to
the large weight, the posters have been sent to me in two parcels.
The first parcel, containing 6000 posters of A5 format, was
posted on 28th May 2014. The second parcel, containing 3999
posters of the same A5 format, was posted to me on 10th June
2014. Unfortunately, the first parcel after arriving to NZ on 9th
June 2014, was stopped by customs officials, forcing me to
learn another lesson of morality described in (2014/6/19) from
item #N3 of this web page. Hence, it was delivered to me only
on 19th June 2014. The second parcel arrived without any obstacles
and I received it on 17th June 2014. As I discovered after receiving
these flyers, in every aspect they proved to be a superior quality
when compared to the flyers of other candidates for these elections,
which in the meantime arrived to my mailbox. These other flyers
actually looked like poor relatives of the flyer with my candidacy.
Perhaps the reason for this is that in New Zealand is NOT available
neither the paper of such a high quality, nor as good printing devices
and the professionalism of printing staff. The posters gifted to
me by a German sympathizer of totalizm were printed with a truly
German precision, diligence, and skill, on the best quality, thick,
slippery and pleasant to the touch, glossy paper "galaxi keramik",
means on a ceramic paper (which is "bio-degradable").
Their colours were vibrant and artistically chosen.
The print was clear and easy to read. Thus, in terms of
quality of the paper used and the printing excellence, artistry
of the design, and wording of the context, the posters have proved
to be impressively superior excellence. When I handed them to
potential voters, I often noted that that they took them to hands
with a kind of respect and admiration, whereupon first viewed
them from all sides like a little "works of art" and checked with
the touch, and only then read their content. Probably some of
potential voters are going to keep these posters as kinds of
unique collectors' items. (It is surprising what kinds of outcomes
may yield prayers of the kind provided in items #B1 and #M3
of this web page.) So I must admit here, that if by any chance
I loose in this election having posters of so excellent quality,
then the reason for this lost for sure would NOT be the posters.
(2014/6/17)
The starting of the personal delivery of election posters into hands
of potential voters. Of course, immediately after receiving such
superior quality election flyers, I undertook their personal delivery
to hands of potential voters from the Hutt South electorate. For
this purpose, I began my systematic rounds from house to house,
knocking to doors and handing my flyers, combined with a
short conversation with these voters who accepted my posters.
Also, inspired by an advice I received, at the end of each
conversation I placed a high importance to shake the hand
of every potential voter - in spite that shaking of hands does
NOT lie in the nature and habits of most of New Zealanders.
During delivery of these posters, I also discovered that the
physical fitness can become a key requirement of the success
in such a personal delivery of posters - which fact I described
more comprehensively in (2014/6/25) from item #N3, and in
item #N4, below on this web page.
(2014/6/27)
The meaningfulness of my statistics from the first 10 days of delivering
election flyers. On 27th June 2014 I finished in Petone the delivery
of the first thousand flyers. I know this because the flyers are packed
by a thousand in one stack, and I just finished for Petone the first stack.
In addition to Petone, one single day of delivering I managed to carry
out in Lower Hutt, Eastbourne and Wainuiomata (typically during one
day I deliver slightly more than 100 flyers). In total, the delivery goes
in line with the plan - see item #N4 from this web page, although
almost constant rains cause that I am forced to deliver the flyers
mainly in the vicinity of my flat. In the course of delivering I managed
to also count the statistical frequency of finding voters at home while
disseminating flyers in the middle of working day. This frequency turns out to be slightly lower
than 20%. My rough assessment indicates also that these 1000 flyers
delivered in Petone was enough to give them away in around one-third
of the area occupied by the township of Petone. This in turn means,
that in order to supply all households in Petone into a single flyer,
probably requires around 3,000 election flyers. As in Petone lives
slightly more than 6,000 people (see item #B1 from the web page
petone.htm),
the average population density in a single household from Petone
hardly exceeds 2 persons. But because the majority of couples live
together with their children, so low average population density
indicates that a significant number of households is occupied
by only one person. The consequence of this is NOT just a waste
of scarce housing resources of the country, but also, amongst others,
such a low level of moral energy as described in item #F5 of this web
page, a shocking number of depressions, mental illnesses and suicides,
as well as the growth of reclusive and antisocial habits in humans.
It would be worth to undertake a fight with factors that force such a
low average population density in households - probably starting
with the change of these unfortunate laws that make many people
to resort to solitary life, as these laws cause that if someone lives
together with another person, then after a time this someone
acquires the right, amongst others, for claiming a half of the
property of the person with which cohabitates (i.e. the laws that
tenants provide with almost similar benefits as spouses).
(2014/7/1)
Scientific project that impressed me in the competitor. On
Tuesday, 1st July, 2014, I was watching the evening news on
NZ television channels "Prime" and TV1. They broadcasted,
among others, interview with my competitor in the elections,
i.e. the current incumbent member of the parliament (MP) from
my electorate - about whom I already have written in (2014/3/26)
from this item. In this interview the MP proposed to undertake
a research project in which with the help of genetic engineering
restored to life would be super-birds called Moa (which are extinct
because of the
Tapanui explosion).
This project incredibly impressed me, because it is just of a type
"reach out where the eyes do NOT reach" recommended
by the Polish poet. The project also meets the criteria of morality,
climbing steeply uphill in the moral field - thus belonging to a group
of projects that I will be supporting regardless of who would be
implementing them. After all, as a highly moral project, it would
bring to NZ a number of long-term benefits, for example by inspiring
various discoveries of additional nature, which would induce a similar
progress in applications, as do e.g. space exploration projects. In
addition, it clearly distinguishes itself as a high calibre, when compared
to typical research projects carried out in NZ, which are usually
at the level of "distribution in NZ of a new type of genetically modified
corn developed by American scientists". Unfortunately, the moral
vector of this project also shows the slanting towards the "Y" axis
from "Fig. #I1", which was immediately illustrated by parliamentary
colleagues of this MP, which colleagues in TV cracked jokes about
him and about the living bird Moa. Let us hope that my electoral
competitor is NOT discouraged by the jokes of his colleagues, nor
that he treats his project only as a kind of pre-election "publicity
stunt", and that over time he actually starts implementing his project
for the good of New Zealand and the good of entire humanity.
(2014/7/7)
My "tripping" over the information about the existence of the already
drilled road tunnel
from Wainuiomata to Petone.
Next to the mountainous valley known as the Hutt Valey, in which
spread all towns of the Hutt South electorate, runs another parallel mountainous
valley in which is located the town of Wainuiomata - also belonging to
this electorate. However, it is separated from us by a high mountain
range. So the only road that currently leads there, climbs steeply to
the top of that mountain range, and after passing the top it abruptly
runs down. When driving through it, my car chocks and almost boils
water in its radiator, burning a lake of gasoline. Always when I need
to drive to Wainuiomata, I wonder why during so many years a tunnel
through this mountain range was NOT drilled yet. Thus, I experienced
a huge shock due to the discovery, which I made while searching on
the internet for data from "Table #C1" of this web page. Accidentally
I "stumbled" then on the information, that such
a road tunnel linking Wainuiomata with Petone
actually has been in existence since the 1930s. It is 8.08 m wide, 5.5 m
high, and have a length of 990 m - means it was designed for driving even busses through it.
It has been drilled and almost finished, but the global economic depression
prevented it then from opening to users. So authorities closed its entrance,
and do NOT rush now to remind people of its existence. Hence, I live in
Petone since 2001, and at the information about the existence of this road
tunnel I came across accidentally only for the first time. Is it possible
that someone wants that this tunnel remains forgotten, because the
inhabitants of Wainuiomata could begin to demand that it is open for
use by cars and busses? After all, its opening would save millions on
needlessly burned gasoline and on unnecessary wear of cars - only
that these savings would remain in pockets of ordinary people who
are commuting between Wainuiomata and the Hutt Valley, and would
NOT generate profits to the petrol cartel nor would yield taxes. I am not
going to even deliberate here beneficial consequences for the natural
environment that the opening of this tunnel would have.
(2014/8/1)
Redesigning of the election poster. Conversations with voters
revealed that, to the printed version of my election poster (that one
shown in "Fig. #A1"), would be beneficial to add several additional
items of information about whcih voters typically ask. Also the
person who designed this poster volunteered again to add this
information. In this way, the enhanced version of election poster
shown below in "Fig. #M1" was created. However, this version is
NOT printed in form of paper flyers, but only available in electronic
format for viewing on this web page.
(2014/8/15)
The honour of being invited to a meeting of voters with candidates.
Yesterday, i.e. on 14th August 2014, at 7 pm, the Lions Club of
Eastbourne organized a meeting of the inhabitants of the township
of Eastbourne with the candidates to elections. Although similar
meetings of inhabitants of various towns in the Hutt South electorate
with candidates for these elections are organized recently on a
frequent basis (e.g. see the article [3#M2] entitled "Candidates
agree" from pages 12-13 of the newspaper
The Hutt News
(issue dated on Tuesday, July 15, 2014), typically at these meetings
are NOT invited "independent" candidates like me who DO NOT belong
to any political party. Hence that meeting in Eastbourne was the first
(and probably the only one) for which I experienced the honour to be
invited. I must also admit that impressed me the course of that meeting -
which was designed and carried out with the precision of a Swiss watch.
It had the length of exactly two hours, the first of which was devoted to
short, because to only around 5 minutes long, presentations of each of the
candidates for the election (the order of these presentations was earlier
"drawn out of a hat"), and the second hour was for questions from the
audience. This meeting was attended (according to my approximate
estimates - because I was too busy to count) about 150 residents of
Eastbourne and exactly 7 candidates for the election (I suspect that
these were all the candidates who stand for the election in the Hutt
South electorate). My presentation was drawn as the fourth, and its
around 5 minutes of length I devoted to a diplomatic letting the audience
know, that in order the country is to prosper, its politicians should display
a high knowledge, experience and life wisdom, as well as the courage
to insist on whatever is important for the nation - even if it is controversial,
runs against the "political correctness" of given times, or is contrary
to the prevailing opinions of party leaders. Unfortunately, I got the
impression that the audience has NOT understand my allusion, that
New Zealanders have a too long, and already too devastating, tradition
of voting for politicians, who are characterized mainly by a large
"political muscle" (e.g. by the size of party that they belong to and
by funds which they spend on their campaign). This is because in
the questions' part of the meeting NO question was directed to me,
while all questions were addressed to those representatives of
parties with big "political muscles". So if I was ever invited again to a
similar meeting, probably I should be in my presentation more direct and more
explicitly calling a spade a spade. But even though my political message
has NOT been understood, still the participation in this meeting was for
me immensely teaching and beneficial. After all, I got to know our candidates
from all political parties, and I had the opportunity to learn their methods
of argumentation and their ways of thinking - while for a scientist and a
philosopher like me this is already a lot to start with.
The matter that most intrigued me at that meeting
and in the subsequent discussion, is that presentations
of all the other candidates, and also the entire discussion,
revolved around priorities and amounts of funding.
In NO statement there was even a trace of awareness
of what I am trying to explain and emphasize in item
#J1 and in the introduction from this web page. Namely,
the fact that since the writing by Karl Marx of his famous
book "Capital", everyone should already be aware, that
the money and the size of financing
are only measures of the amount of human work which they
can buy, however, which work can also be squandered due
to immoral (erroneous) decisions and implementations - hence
the real indicator of how well someone will solve the problems
of the country and its population, is his or her morality,
knowledge, life experience, and the courage to decide
and to implement whatever is the most right and most needed.
So instead of discussing how much money and for what
should be thrown, for the good of country voters should
rather check out their candidates for the opinion what
should be done on a non-financial field to bring the country
out of the culture of resources wasting, decision-making
biases, lack of accountability of decision-makers, and
the powerlessness of ordinary people. In other words,
instead of looking at "with what muscles individual
candidates intend to operate", rather it would be worthwhile
to check "what moral and mental qualities they have".
(2014/8/21)
The official submission for the approval of my nomination from voters
as a candidate for the election. Today is the first day of candidates
registration for 2014 elections. Because a long time ago I already have
prepared the entire documentation required for registering as a candidate
(i.e. I prepared the nomination form completed by the voters, the
confirmations of enrolments as Electors for all my nominators, and
the proof of my NZ citizenship), I arranged already several days in
advance an appointment with the "Returning Officer for Hutt South",
to officially verify the legality of my nomination, to accept my deposit,
and to register me as a candidate for this elections. The whole
check of the legality of my documentation took the officer around
half an hour. After the checking, the documentation has been sent
to the election headquarters for the official approval. The answer
whether I am officially approved by the headquarters of the elections
as a candidate for Hutt South is to be given to me sometime next
week - i.e. already after the registration of all candidates is finished.
During the visit in the office of Returning Officer
I noticed a map with marked on it the new boundaries
of the Hutt South electorate. Although I could not
get a copy of this map, I took this opportunity and
compared with this map the prepared earlier with
my own effort a list of townships from Hutt South
described in item #C1 of this web page. It turned
out, that on my list is missed several townships
newly assigned to Hutt South, and that the township
Avalon is removed entirely from our electorate -
while I previously believed that the south part
of it still belongs to Hutt South. So now I can
correct the content of Table #C1 from this web
page, and also I can adjust my plan of campaigning.
(2014/8/29)
Training of candidates for the election. Today,
i.e. on Friday, 29 August 2014, was held a training
of candidates from Hutt South for the election. This
training repeated the most important information
contained in the brochure [1#M2] - especially that
concerning formalities which the candidates still
have to fulfil, as well as repeated some elements
of the electoral law which candidates are required
to observe. For me this training was, however, particularly
interesting for several other reasons. For example,
It formally confirmed that I was officially included
into the list of candidates for these elections.
In addition, it allowed me to learn various statistics
about which I was curious. And so, I learned that in
Hutt South to the election stands 8 candidates - in
this number 7 selected by political parties, and 1
independent, that is me. (The training was attended
by only 3 candidates, i.e. by myself, by the candidate
of the "National" party, and by the candidate of the
"NZ First" party.) The political parties, which have put
up here their candidates, are: National, Labour, NZ first,
Greens, Conservatives, Act, United Future. So NOT all
existing political parties have put their candidates in
Hutt South - e.g. there is NO candidate from the party
"Internet-Mana". Throughout the entire New Zealand
for this election stands only 20 "independent" candidates
(the total number of party candidates was NOT given
to us). This means that, since in NZ exists 64 General
electorates plus 7 Maori electorates, less than one such
"independent" candidate is for each over 3 electorates
(constituencies) - this statistic does NOT surprise me
in the light of various forms of discrimination that
independent candidates experience in NZ when
compared with party candidates (for details see
(2014/8/7) from item #N3). The training also revealed
to me (unintentionally) another example of discrimination
of independent candidates by the electoral law - namely
during the last day of the campaign this law allows
political parties to show publicly the emblem of their
party, but the same law prohibits to display names of
candidates for the election (which fact means that the
parties still can continue then to advertise themselves,
but independent candidates who do NOT belong to
any political party, do NOT have means to advertise
themselves - because according to the same law they
do NOT have their own emblem).
During the training discussed here I also received
a reply to my request made on (2014/8/21), during
the official receipt of my nomination for the election.
Namely, I issued then the official request to the election
authorities, that after the election they provided me
with a souveneer in form of a single clean, unused,
left-over voting form (i.e. one ballot paper) with my
name as a voting candidate appearing on it. This
form I would like to keep as a souvenir of my standing
for this election and as a souvenir of my unusual experiences
which were linked to this standing. Unfortunately,
the answer I received was that NO, such a clean,
unused, left-over voting form cannot be given to me.
This answer surprised me enormously, because on the
same training we were also informed that after the counting
of votes and after scanning the contents of all votes to
government computers, the used voting forms, together
with all unused voting forms, are being destroyed. Thus,
the unused voting forms are treated as if they contain in
themselves a strategic secret. Meanwhile, the only thing
they should contain are lists of the party names and
candidates put up to a vote. So the question which
here arises, is whether such a refusal to give me
an unused form which anyway will be subjected to a
destruction, is for example legal according to the content
of the "freedom of official information act".
(2014/9/8)
Confirmation of the accessibility of lists of candidates in Internet.
From one of voters I just learned, that lists of candidates to this
election are already available in Internet. (I myself seem to be
too busy with the campaign, to still have time for searching
the Internet.) So I checked this availability. In fact the list of all
8 candidates from Hutt South, including my name, is available
at the web page information-voters-hutt-south from
the web site at the address
elections.org.nz/events/2014-general-election/electorate-info/.
(2014/9/9)
The honour of being invited to a meeting with voters in the township
of Maungaraki. My ears frequently reached various news about
numerous meetings of voters with candidates, whose organizers
invited only party candidates, and completely ignored the inviting
of the "independent" candidate, means me. Examples of such
meetings for which I was NOT invited are indicated, amongst others,
in the article [7#M2] entitled "Meeting the candidates", from
page 5 of free newspaper
Wainuiomata news
(issue dated on Wednesday, 3 September 2014), as well as in the
article [3#M2] of (2014/8/15) from this item. Only organizers from
the township of Maungaraki, scenically located by the top of
Wellington mountain range, invited me also. Thus, after the
meeting in Eastbourne described above with the date (2014/8/15),
this meeting in Maungaraki on Tuesday, 9 September 2014, was
the second and the last one in which I had the honour to participate
during the current election campaign. The meeting began at 7 pm
and lasted one and half an hour. It was attended by all 8 candidates
from Hutt South. I estimate that participated in it the audience of around
150 voters. At the beginning, in the reverse alphabetical order, each
candidate received 5 minutes to present the key points of his/her election
program (i.e. to convince voters to vote for that particular candidate).
Then the audience-voters were invited to ask questions addressed
simultaneously to all candidates, for which questions each of the
candidates received his/her turn to answer - including me. I believe
that this system of questions addressed simultaneously to all
candidates, was much more favourable to voters and less discriminatory
to candidates, than the system of questions addressed directly
to individual candidates that was used at the meeting in Eastbourne.
After all, it included also me to the group responding to questions.
On the other hand, at the meeting in Eastbourne no-one addressed
a question directly to me - so in the questioning part in there I had
NO opportunity to even open my mouth. In addition, the system
of questioning used in Maungaraki allowed voters to immediately
compare the quality and depth of response of all individual
candidates, and thus allow voters to select in their minds on
which candidate they will vote - to represent them in NZ parliament.
I, as usual, came to this meeting with a detailed plan of what
I say in my introductory speech. In spite that I was already tired
and in pain, because at that day the weather was beautiful and
hence I previously done my tiring daily rounds around homes of
voters while my back was in pain - see (2014/9/9-11) from item #N3,
due to the inspiration and help from God my mind worked perfectly.
I noted that my initial speech managed to convince voters. In turn,
in the questions' part I even managed to shine. For each of 3 questions
asked at this meeting I provided an answer and a justification that
resulted from that described in item #J1 of this web page "method
of decision-making based on the criteria of morality". After one of
the questions, which checked "whether" and "how" the candidates
see the possibility of stopping that currently out of control increase of
electricity prices in NZ, I became the only candidate of that evening
whose answer the audience accepted with the applause. This is
because in my response I repeated the plan to create a real competition
for NZ electric cartel - which plan is described in (2b) from item #D1
of this web page.
Page 1
Page 2
Fig. #M1. Here is an enhanced, 2 pages long version of election flyer
from "Fig. #A1". This version contains additional information about
which voters typically ask. However, it is available only in the electronic
form - i.e. it was NOT printed. Notice that copying of the above
version of the flyer, prepared in a secure photographic format
"jpg", also is NOT blocked.
(Click on any page above to see it enlarged.)
Page 1:
The first page of the enhanced version of my election flyer.
It summarises my major goals for accomplishing in case if
I am elected to the NZ parliament.
Page 2
(still in the process of design and development):
The second page of the enhanced version of my election flyer.
It summarises major reasons for which the most beneficial
for the voters turns out to be voting for my "Independent"
candidacy. It also provides the second (spare) Internet address
of this election web page - to prevent situations described
in (2014/8/23) from item #N3 of this web page. So if the first
of these addresses fails to work, then the reader can find
the same web page on the second (spare) address.
#M3.
The prayer of thanking God - if you wish
to join me in repeating it with me, it is enough
that you just read it carefully with attentive
and spiritual attitude of thanksgiving:
Heavenly Father, please accept these sincere
thanks for everything that you have done so
that your servant, Dr Jan Pajak, could implement
whatever is described on this web page, and
whatever he carried out additionally in
connection with his goals and intentions,
that is, for the inspiration, for giving him
strength and motivation to do whatever he
have already done, or to accept impossibility
of doing whatever turned out to be impossible
to do, for inspiring help and cooperation of
those people who had helped him, and for
the limiting of actions of his opponents to
only whatever these opponents already did,
for Your help in the piecing together the
knowledge which has opened the actions
already completed by him to the notice
of Your servant, and for the inspiration
to correctly interpret and write down this
knowledge in order to share it with other
interested people, as well as for all other
forms of help and Your superior decisions
which do NOT have to even be perceptible
for us, but which in Your superior knowledge
and foresight You decided to make in
the matters described on this web page.
Amen.
Part #N:
Manifestations of impeding actions of the "moral field"
which I managed to notice during implementation of
activities described on this web page:
#N1.
My activities comparable to the "dentist
attempting to cure the shark with aching teeth":
From the first moment when I was making the
decision to put up my candidacy in the elections
described here, I was aware of the seriousness
of the problem that I am to take on my shoulders.
After all, still are alive in my memories the
times when after taking political action in
the Polish "Solidarity" I had to flee the
country in order to save my freedom and
perhaps even my life. If this situation now
also be repeated, I do NOT have the energy
to run again. Also, in today's world there
is no longer a place where a person disliked
by someone politically could feel safe. After
all, as everyone probably noticed this already
from the behaviour of the authorities and
decision-makers in today's world, people
who insist on reforms urgently needed
in the country in which they live, expose
themselves to a situation which can be
compared to the situation of a "dentist
attempting to cure in the sea a shark
with aching teeth".
Soon I discovered that my prediction of serious
problems on the path to implement the intentions
described in this web page began to fulfil. Just
after the publication of this web page I started to
feel as if the "hell opened up under my feet", and
practically everything that I attempted to do in this
case, encountered increasingly larger resistance.
Of course, being aware of the existence and
operation of the so-called moral field (i.e.
the gravity-like invisible field, that on this page is
described in items #D5, #F5, #I1, #J1, and (2014/4/19)
from #M2), I am well aware that
when trying to act morally
I must encounter resistance generated by the
moral field, the force (F) of which resistance must
be proportional to the benefits (a) that other
people could reap in the case if my actions
were successful, and also proportional to the
number (m) of people who then would benefit
from the results of my actions.
In the further item #N3 of this web page I am
describing the most important obstacles to overcome,
or factors that prevented progress in whatever
I did, the action of which I noted so-far. After all,
these are they that form the moral field which
I need to overcome in this case of my morally
correct actions. However, before I start reporting
them, firstly in next item #N2 of this web page
I am going to provide a few comments about
my previous experiences with the moral field,
and about conclusions to which these prior
experiences lead me (to which conclusions
it is worth to pay attention when the moral field
turns out to be too overwhelming for us).
#N2.
My previous experience with work of the "moral field",
and conclusions that arise from that experience:
In my life I encountered several times the action
of immensely powerful "moral field". It is because
of these encounters that I identified and described
in item #G1 from my web page named
eco_cars.htm,
the self-regulatory moral phenomena which I
named the "curse of inventors" and
the "inventive impotency".
Also in a number of cases, the difficulties and
obstacles formed by the moral field proved to be so huge
and so difficult to overcome, that in order to NOT
be completely destroyed by these obstacles,
and to stay alive, I was forced to give up and
abandon of whatever I tried to do then. Examples
of just such cases when the power of the "moral
field" proved to be so overwhelming, that it forced
me to abandon my efforts of implementing to the
end of whatever then I was doing, are all my
inventions (e.g. the
Magnocraft,
Oscillatory Chamber,
telekinetic devices, etc.),
as well as virtually every most important amongst
my scientific theories (e.g. the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity, the
based on morality methods of our defence against cataclysms, the
theory of time and time vehicles, etc.).
My experiences gathered during overcoming resistance of the
moral field during attempts to implement
my inventions and to disseminate my scientific theories,
differ from the experiences that affected me in 2014
during the election in NZ. Namely, that previous resistance
of moral field manifested itself mainly in opposition,
while sometimes even in malicious actions, of other
people, i.e. in denials, bans, scoffing, removals from
jobs, unjustified criticism, unfair treatment, contempt,
etc., served to me by numerous people practicing
questionable kinds of morality. On the other hand, in
the elections of 2014, to these obstacles from actions
of immoral people also were added further strong
obstacles in the form of events that only God could
deliberately form. But so happened, that I established
a long time ago, that the implementation of morally
correct human decisions can be blocked due to two
different reasons, namely either because (1) immoral
people insist that this action should be stopped (this is
from where the abovementioned "curse inventors" originates),
or because (2) it runs against the plans of God. I also
knew that God promises in the Bible that He will discreetly
inform morally acting people about every of His decision
that affects them. So I decided that during the elections
of 2014 I am to gather evidence which verifies whether
the inclusion into the obstructive
work of moral field also phenomena that can be caused
solely by God, is just this discreet sign that a given morally
correct action runs against the long-term plans of God.
Of course, all my defeated struggles with the
"moral field" forced me to think and to draw
various conclusions. So I am to summarize
here the most important conclusions drawn
on the subject of attributes displayed by the
short-term resistance of the moral field in cases
when we implement some morally correct action -
which conclusions I managed to establish due
to my previous experiences:
1.
The nature and the strength of short-term resistance of the
moral field, contain discreet hints as to whether we should
try to overcome these resistance, or rather we are permitted
to abandon a given morally correct action. For example,
if our morally correct action runs against the long-term plans
of God, then the nature of the resistance of moral field
that reveals itself to us, is such that this resistance clearly
indicates to us that it originates mainly from God (and
thus that we are permitted to abandon a given action) -
e.g. this resistance is mainly from the weather, health,
acts of nature, etc., as it is evident from examples listed
in item #N3 below, while it is summarised by the general
rule described in item #L3 above. But if our morally correct
action encounters resistance almost exclusively originating
from immoral actions of other people, then this is a sign
that we should insist on the continuation of it - unless
the strength of this resistance exceeds our ability to
overcome obstacles. Only that in order to accomplish
a success, with the elapse of time we should improve
our methods with the use of which we implement this
action.
2.
At the present level of our knowledge, the actual size
of the forces of short-term resistance (F=ma) from the "moral field"
that we are to encounter in carrying out given morally-correct activities,
is impossible to predict or estimate in a purely theoretical
manner - i.e. without the prior taking this activities.
Therefore, in order to learn how big is this force of
resistance, one must first take an action, and only
then the actual size of that force of resistance is to
reveal itself to us.
3.
The resistance force of the "moral field" (F=ma) can be
estimated relatively quickly after the taking an action.
Thus, relatively quickly we achieve the understanding
whether we have a sufficient supply of energy and tenacity
to continually break through the kinds of obstacles that
the "moral field" is to persistently place on our path.
We must remember, that when we overcome, or walk
around, of another amongst these obstacles,
the "moral field" is to place on our path a next one with
the same level of difficulty. Therefore, relatively quickly
after taking the action we are able to estimate what
cannot be estimated without an actual commencement
of a given kind of action - namely "whether we will be
able to bring this action to a successful end?".
4.
If, according to the will of God, a given kind of morally
correct action is to be implemented by us, but the kind
of this action requires that the force of resistance from
the "moral field" is greater than our capacity to overcome
it, then God sends us helpers and collaborators - who
together with us create a team which will bring this action
to a successful end. Therefore, when starting an
action that unleashes the overwhelming us power of moral
field, we should seek these helpers, and under any
circumstances do NOT repudiate the helping hands
that they extend to us.
5.
If the resistance force from the "moral field" far exceeds
our ability to overcome it, and in our struggle we notice
that we are NOT joined by any aides and allies sent to
us by God, or that there is too little of these allies and their capacities
are too low, then it actually means that we are on the side
destined to lose, and that we should give up, because the
doing of this action God intended for someone else or in
totally different circumstances. If, in spite of everything,
we will continue to insist with this action, then probably
fruitless efforts are to gradually destroy us. Meanwhile,
the philosophy of totalizm asks us that only
those ideas are worth of our support, which require from
us to live for them, NOT to die for them.
6.
The giving up in the face of overwhelming difficulties
is also in line with the morally correct rules of conduct.
After all, the giving up in one case, frees our forces and
allows us to embark on other morally correct action that
we could NOT take if we insist on the action for the
successful ending of which we begin to be sure we
run out of strength. Giving up is also consistent with
the widely accepted prayer popularly known as the
"Prayer of Anonymous Alcoholics",
which states, quote:
"God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference. (Reinhold Niebuhr).
#N3.
So-far noticed manifestations of the obstructive in short-term work of the "moral field":
Until now, I noticed a whole range of events,
the characteristics of which indicated, that
the "moral field" threw them under my feet,
so that whatever I was doing on the issues
described in this web page, forced me to
continuously overcome the resistance introduced
by these events, and that the insertion into
my actions a huge ongoing effort was required.
After all, according to the definition of "moral field"
provided in item #I1 from this web page,
these events, independently from causing
a kind of intellectual blockage (X), and
the introduction of difficulties of a physical
nature (Z), also induced in my mind, among
others, various feelings (Y) of kinds like a
resistance, fear, feeling of danger, reflection,
doubt, resentment, etc., and in this way they
hindered or held back my actions towards
all three axes X, Y and Z illustrated in "Fig.
#I1". Below I am describing these events.
An intriguing attribute of the moral field, is that it
has a continuous character, in spite that events
which form it in our minds have a jumping (discrete)
character. This is because our mind acts as a kind
of processor of such individual events which form
the moral field, into a continuous pressure of this
field onto our intellect. As a result, I noted during
my vacation from 22 April till 7 June 2014, that
in spite during these vacations individual events
that initiated in my mind the pressure of the moral
field happened rarely and in significant distances
from each other, still the pressure of this field that
I felt with my intellect was continuous, constant,
and practically always of the same force of pushing
(although with the elapse of time it should decrease).
Most clearly the moral field acts in a similar manner
as the discrete elapses of that "reversible software
time" described in item #F4 from this web page -
which discrete elapses are subjectively perceived
by people (who age in that time) as a continuous
passage of time.
Of course, in accordance with the principles of operation
of the "moral field" explained, amongst others, in items
#J1 and #I1 from this web page, none of the disturbing
events described here would appear, if what I
am doing is intended as an "immoral" action.
On the contrary, for the actions of an immoral
character, the "moral field" actually "helps" in
their implementation. That is why, when "everything
goes smoothly" we should have a second thought
about it, because whatever we are intending and
doing is probably highly "immoral".
While reading the following descriptions of hindering
actions from the "moral field", which so far manifested
themselves to me, it is worth noting, however, that
the impression experienced during the reading
depends on the quality and accuracy of the description,
NOT on the kind of phenomena that is reported (i.e.
tiring or scary phenomenon described incorrectly
may, for example, be appearing as fun or harmless).
But actually all phenomena which I report below,
no matter how accurately and faithfully I managed
to describe them, for me personally generated a
whole range of difficulties and serious obstacles
in the implementation of intentions described here,
all of which act in an obstructive manner on
several different planes (ways) at once.
(2014/3/25)
The night alarm in my flat. In my float I installed a "smoke
alarm". Near the morning of the day in which I was going to
publish for the first time a Polish version of this web page,
this smoke-alarm began to howl like crazy, putting on the
feet all the inhabitants of the house. I, of course, knew perfectly
well this type of alarms since before 2007, means since I still
believed that the planet Earth is under a secretive occupation
of UFOnauts with the parasitic morality. In these old times such
alarms sometimes used to woke me up even several times every
week. At that time I used to think that these alarms are caused
by the penetration of the shell of an invisible UFO vehicle covered
with the so-called "onion charcoal" into the alarm's sensor, so
that this sensor treated the charcoal like smoke (this "onion
charcoal" that frequently covers shells of UFO vehicles is
described in item #B3 from my web page named
evidence.htm).
After 2007 the frequency of these alarms gradually kept
decreasing, but never disappeared completely, and even
now still keeps waking me up several times each year.
Of course, also this time there was NO fire nor smoke in
the house, which would explain what caused the alarm.
However, I was aware of the importance of what I just
started to do, so for me that alarm has become a kind
of a "gentle hint" and "letting me know". It is worth to
notice, that this alarm, like every other manifestation
of the work of moral field, interfered with my activities
in all three possible manners simultaneously. For example,
by waking me up at night and preventing me from having
a good sleep, it introduced a feeling of physical fatigue, which
later lowered my ability for an effective work. Moreover, in my
mind it stimulated various thoughts, which in turn induced
feelings, the end result of which was the weakening of my
emotional ability to implement whatever I intended. It also
introduced a kind of mental blocking thoughts to my
intellectual eagerness of carrying out of what I intended.
(2014/4/1-7)
The impossibility to start the campaign, before the English
version of this web page is available to voters at the address
pajak.org.nz.
After all, to be able to campaign, I had to have something which
describes my goals and intentions, and to which I could direct
the potential voters when they wanted to learn more about my
intentions.
(2014/4/3)
The blocking of Wi-Fi in my computer. Clearly some malicious
program that got into my computer, blocked in it the access to the
Internet via Wi-Fi. In spite of long and frequently repeated attempts,
this blockade of Wi-Fi I was unable to remove. As a result, it greatly
hinders my actions, because I am forced to either use a "Cyber
Cafe", or to connect my computer to the Internet in a different way
than via a Wi-Fi (which is very annoying and uncomfortable).
That use of Wi-Fi my computer still had blocked when I carried
out the most recent update of this web page.
(2014/4/3)
The warning passed to me by the "Man in Black" (MIB).
In the caption under "Fig. #G1c" from the web page named
sw_andrzej_bobola_uk.htm
I described one of the most obvious of my encounters with
mysterious beings described in the literature as the "Men
in Black" or "MIB" (in old times they would be called "devils").
In my life I have had a number of meetings with these
terrifying beings - hence I know their appearance, capabilities,
and exceptional seriousness of whatever they have to say.
Another of these MIBs showed himself to me on 3rd April 2014,
in order to give me a warning and to encourage me for even
greater precautions in the matters of elections and reforms
described here. Neither the appearance of this MIB, nor a
sinister warning that I received from him, spurred in me
pleasurable sensations. The intensified by the meeting
with this MIB need for extremely prudent operation, has
also introduced a further serious impediment to the
implementation of the activities described on this web
page. After all, the mere intention to introduce reforms
in NZ is already a kind of political "carelessness" on
my part - so how immensely difficult turns out to be
the effort of introducing reforms, while simultaneously
maintaining a safe level of being careful.
For a number of days following the meeting with
that MIB, I had nightmares during which I woke
up drenched in sweat and feeling attacks of strong
panic. What even more interesting, these had to
be externally induced in my mind during sleep,
as never after waking up from them I remembered
what actually I dreamed about (typically, after
waking from a dream, I still remember what kind
of dreaming preceded my wake up). Fortunately,
these nightmares ceased by themselves around
Easter - after all, just by themselves they were
sufficiently debilitating my health to cause the
abandonment of the continuation of my election
efforts.
(2014/4/7-17)
Almost incessant torrential rains, which hampered
my campaigning. In the conjunction with the
powerful storm winds that constantly tormented
Hutt Valley and that prevented me from the use
of an umbrella, these rains meant that during the
trial campaigning I was soaked several times "to
every last thread". As it turned out, these rains were
the remains of a tropical cyclone "Ita" - for details
see the article [1#N3] entitled "Storm
wreaks havoc through the south", from page A3 of the newspaper
Weekend Herald
(issue dated on Saturday-Sunday, April 19-20, 2014).
(2014/4/18-20)
The first indication, that an access to the domain
pajak.org.nz
is repetitively, though secretly, blocked. Starting from
the first day of installing both language versions of this
web page (i.e. the Polish language version and the
English version) on the 24/7 host, I tested daily whether these
two versions work OK. However, during the Easter holidays,
when I was expecting the most intense viewing of this
web page, suddenly I noticed that the counters of visits
installed in them stopped to move. It looked as if no
one else, but me, looked at these web pages over the
entire period of Easter. The case quickly explained
itself, when one of my readers wrote to me an email,
that these web pages are impossible to open, and
that instead of them shows a message "Service
Unavailable". After receiving this email, counters
on both web pages suddenly moved forward again -
as if someone reads my emails. When I was
test-visiting in 24/7 both of these web pages at the
time of that message, they kept opening smoothly and
NO messages appeared. This means, that both web
pages were intentionally and selectively sabotaged
by someone, so that to me they seemed to be working,
but for other people they were no longer available.
After Easter this situation with the sudden stopping
of the counters of visits began to be repeated more
frequently. The conclusion from this experience can
be drawn, that if the reader intends to open a web
page or a domain, which is NOT to be welcomed by
someone in power or in money, then the reader should
make sure that this web page is NOT open in the country
over which such unwelcoming someone has the power
or influence - because the reader soon discovers
that the page quickly ceases to function as it should.
(2014/4/19)
The removal of the township of Naenae from the electorate
Hutt South. Previously I concentrated my campaign just
on this township. The removal of this township I have described
in (2014/4/19) from item #M2. It annulled all previous
accomplishments in my campaign.
(2014/4/22)
My departure on a 7-week long vacation, planned long before
the matter of stadium in Petone forced me into action described
here. My wife has long deserved a rest and holidays.
So already in mid-January 2014 we planned our vacation,
we purchased tickets, we notified the family and friends, etc.
When it became necessary to take actions described here,
these vacation removed further 7 consecutive weeks from
the action on the election. After all, during the holidays
I can do nothing, except precarious planning and writing.
An interesting aspect of this departure was that
at night, just a few hours earlier, the local airline
called "Jetstar Airways" (a subsidiary of "Qantas")
decided to cancel the flight of the plane for which
my wife and I purchased a ticket - of course NOT
bothering with such thing as e.g. a notification
of us that the flight has been cancelled (although in
their computers with our tickets, they had our phone
number). So when on the day of departure myself
and my wife arrived at the airport by a relatively
expensive "Shuttle" (in NZ almost everything is
several times more expensive than in other countries),
it turned out that our plane is NOT flying, while
another aircraft of the same "Jetstar Airways"
has NO vacant sits. So the situation forced us
to purchase yet another pair of tickets to a
completely different airline "Air New Zealand",
which seeing our desperation asked the price
of $NZ 458 for a flight of about 600 km long
between Wellington and Auckland - i.e. a price
higher than one-third of the current price of
the ticket (of $NZ 1,300) for two people for a
foreign airline "Malaysia Airlines System" at
the trip of about 9,000 km separating Auckland
from Kuala Lumpur (in which price is included
also drinks and two meals during the flight,
which Air New Zealand does not offer to its
passengers, as well as the cost of hotel
accommodation upon arrival to Kuala Lumpur
and the cost of transportation from the airport
to this hotel). Of course, going through such
an experience and at the same time remembering
how responsibly, professionally and affordably
airlines of NZ behaved in 1982 (described
in item #A1 of this web page), one cannot be
surprised that more and more urgent becomes
the need of deep reforms in the country visibly
sagging in marshes of the philosophy which is the
inverse of totalizm.
The only doubt which may still rankle regarding
these reforms, is whether God will allow to carry
them out painlessly and democratically, or rather
NZ awaits the fate and the turmoil that we are
already seeing in many other countries whose
rulers made sure to NOT make the necessary
reforms on time.
(2014/4/22-3)
A night in a hotel with "air-con" and catching a flu
or a cold. The first night of our holidays we
spent in a hotel-room that had "air-condition" working
which I could NOT turn off, and which the whole
night flooded the room with frosty air. As a result,
from the cold air I caught a kind of flu or a cold,
which meant that until around 17 August 2014
I still was constantly coughing, sneezing, and I
had all the symptoms of a flu or a severe cold -
that were diminishing extremely slowly. So
initially I could NOT focus even on such
simple activities as writing or planning.
(2014/4/24)
Thanks to the internet and systems of reporting on
progress in the delivery of parcels, I managed to
notice that two days after our departure on vacation
a parcel with a consignment of 70 flyers size A4, printed
out on a computer (these shown in "Fig. #A1") has finally
been delivered. The totalizt who helps me printed out
these flyers on his own printer, and them posted them
to me through couriers on 3rd April 2014. He was informed
that typically to NZ a shipment arrives after around
8 days. However, the Internet tracking of progress
of that parcel showed that it has NOT reached NZ
until 22 April (i.e. after 19 days), and that it was
delivered on April 24, 2014, i.e. after the next
2 days. (It was delivered to my neighbour - she
gave it to me after my return from vacation.)
Thus, these flyers, which could start working
for the elections even before I left for vacation,
were available for an use only some time after
my return - a shorthly before already available were
also these 9999 superiorly printed election flyers
size A5 about which I am writing in (2014/5/28)
from item #M2 of this web page. At the same time,
such over 20 days waiting for their delivery adds
an argument to my previous assertions from the
introduction to this web page, that every country
in the world gradually is overgrown with difficulties
in proper completion of the normal duties for which
its inhabitants draw salaries that they deserve.
Only around 10 computer printouts of the flyer size
A4 I delivered to voters between 9 and 16 June 2014,
i.e. before the parcels with 9999 printed flyers of
size A5 arrived to my hands. Remaining around
60 flyers A4 size I delivered to voters on Monday,
15 September 2014 - i.e. a day after I finished
the delivery of these 9999 flyers size A5. (I.e.
around 50 flyers A4 I delivered in person to
households in Lowry Bay, further around
10 I delivered to households of York Bay.)
(2014/6/8)
The "tearful" welcome in NZ. From our vacation we returned
to NZ just after the noon on Sunday, June 8, 2014. I still had a bit
of cough after health problems that I described in item #C7 from the web page
healing.htm.
When we left the building of Auckland's International Airport,
a part of the sky which we could see between the buildings
was blue and the sun was shining. But to complete the last
phase of our journey to Wellington, we had to get to another
building of the local airport in Auckland, which was located
about 10 minutes of walk along the fences of airport. We had
a choice, either go in there on foot, or ride a bus. Since the
sun was shining and it was warm (17 degrees C), I decided
that it was better to walk in there. After all, it will allow us to
stretch our legs after a long flight and also allow the breathing
with fresh air of NZ. After a few minutes of walking, when we
were about a half our brief way, the sky suddenly went black
and poured a thick rain. Of course, in spite that this walkway
between the buildings of international and local airports in Auckland
is used every day by hundreds of passengers, in spite of that
the airport annually boasts huge profits taken from these
passengers, in spite that the sidewalk in there exists since
almost immemorial time, in spite that the weather in Auckland
has a bad habit to change dramatically within just a few minutes,
and in spite that this pavement is relatively short - because just
a few hundred-meter long, the airport authorities have not dropped
onto the idea of constructing a protective roof above this sidewalk.
As a result, a minute later we were both wet. My wife scolded
me for the decision to walk on foot, reminding me that the further
travel in wet clothes is NOT going to help me in the rapid cure
of my cough. She also repeated my frequent statement, that in
New Zealand weather can change drastically within a few minutes.
Of course, my wife was right. I just thought to myself, that with
this "tearful" greeting and with emphasis on my cough, we begin
the post-holiday phase of my preparations for the elections.
The next day we learned with a horror from TV
news, that this sudden rain which soaked us
between buildings of the airport in Auckland,
was actually a harbinger of a powerful storm
which the day later hit all of New Zealand,
causing flooding in several areas of the country
(e.g. Canterbury, vicinity of Nelson, and of course
parts of Auckland) - for details see the article [2#N3]
entitled "A month of rain in a few days - look what's next",
from pages A4 and A5 of the newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Wednesday, June 11, 2014).
In Auckland this strom turned out to be the
most powerful and most destructive since
around 70 years. According to forecasts, this
storm and heavy rains supposed to last until
Saturday, 14 June 2014 - probably to again rebuild
the pressure of "moral field" on my decisions,
when after the return from holiday I am to decide
about the recommencing my rounds from a home
to home for a personal meetings and talks with
potential voters.
(2014/6/19)
Caused by customs of NZ about 10-day delay in the delivery of
election flyers. DHL boasts about the speed of its shipments.
Typically a parcel go from Germany to New Zealand in about 8 days.
The second of the two parcels with my election flyers, as described
in (2014/5/28) from item #M2 of this web page, reached me in just
7 days. Unfortunately, the first parcel, containing 6000 election flyers,
sent from Germany on 28 May 2014, arrived to New Zealand customs
officers on 9 June 2014 and got stuck in there. To cause its delivery
I was forced to overcome a series of nerves breaking formalities.
Firstly, on Friday, June 13, in the evening I received a letter from
customs stating. that my parcel requires a "clearance". Because
the offices are closed on Saturdays and Sundays, on Monday 16
June I went to the customs office to explain that the parcel contains
only election flyers (or "printed matter") which do NOT have any
commercial value, because they are a gift and they will be distributed
for free. Unfortunately, the customs officers refused to do for what
doing their office was established, means they refused to do the
"clearance" of my parcel. They ordered me to hire a special agent,
"custom broker", which will do this "clearance" for them. But services
of such a "custom broker" typically cost about $150 - the payment
of which a sum would break my principle of "zero-dollar" election
campaign. When I started to look for a "custom broker" to hire, it
turned out that there is a lot of them, but with the postal parcels
are willing to deal only post office brokers - who, however, are so
busy with work and customers, that almost it is impossible a direct
meeting or telephone conversation with them. Fortunately, their
answering machine gave me their email address at which I could
write to contact them. So on 17 June 2014 I wrote a long email at
this address, in which I explained why the election flyers contained
in my parcel have no commercial value and are merely "printed matter".
In response, the next day I received a short email that to the parcel
with my flyers has been applied "concession" and it is "cleared".
I received it on 19 June 2014 - that is with about 10 days unnecessary
dalay, which could have been avoided if the customs officers x-rayed
the parcel and realized that it actually contains what is written in
its declaration, namely the posters/flyers.
(2014/6/25)
Overcoming the resistance of the moral field, versus the physical
fitness, mental and emotional strength, and long-term benefits of
delivering in person election flyers. The resistance of the moral
field during my personal delivering election flyers and giving them
directly into the hands of voters, revealed itself to me, among others,
in the form of requirement of a high physical fitness and also mental
and emotional strength. As I experienced this in practice, the delivery
of flyers directly into hands of voters turns out to be so exhausting
physically, mentally and emotionally, that in the initial phase of my
campaign I was able to deliver in one day of only around 100 flyers.
At the same time, however, from all solutions for the problem of
flyers delivering to voters that I know of, such personal distribution
of flyers climbs most steeply uphill in the moral field. Therefore,
according to the findings of totalizm, in the long-term it has to
generate the most of benefit and the least undesirable side effects.
For this reason, it is also the most educational from all activities
related to the election. This educational value of the delivering
flyers in person, caused that to this "part #N" I decided to add
below an extra item #N4, in which I described in more detail
everything that is connected with the delivery of flyers, means
e.g. the procedure of choosing the most moral solution for the
problem of delivering (i.e. the solution that climbs most steeply
uphill in the moral field), the physical, mental and emotional
pressures that the resistance of the moral field imposes onto
the personal distribution of election flyers, examples of long-term
benefits that stems from using this most moral procedure of
delivering flyers, etc. I suggest to have also a look at that
item #N4 below.
(2014/7/22)
Almost three weeks of continuous rain. The Tuesday, July 22
2014, was for us the first day in about last three weeks, when the
winter rain stopped for almost a whole day, and thus when I could
normally deliver the daily portion of election flyers. In around last
three weeks rain poured almost continuously during days, so that
during that period only two and a half times I managed to find a
sufficiently long break in the cold rain to go and to deliver election
flyers - but to do this only near my flat, so that I could quickly return
to the flat when the cold rain again started to pour. What is worse,
the weather forecasts predict that after this one-day break, such
continuous winter rains are going to return for the duration of at
least another full week.
(2014/8/23)
Another trouble with the internet hosting 24/7 - i.e. another
case of multi-day lack of access to my election website
www.pajak.org.nz.
The capability of moral field to impede the access to the
Internet, also induced a number of problems for my election
campaign. For example, quite promising advertising of the
New Zealand web hosting named 24/7 (incidentally, the location of which is
Christchurch - a city of earthquakes),
caused that for my domain and for my election web page was
selected just that "24/7" hosting. Unfortunately, from the first
moment this host was entrusted with my election web page and
domain, various problems started. For example, the instalment
and activation took four days - see (2014/3/28) from item #M2.
Server with this web page often experienced failures - see
(2014/4/18-20) above in item #N3. These failures in turn meant
that both, the election web page, as well as my email address
associated with the election web page, become unavailable
for interested readers and for myself. Also, the more close was
to the election date, the hosting services of 24/7 become worse.
Complaints of clients of this hosting caused that 24/7 was even
criticized in the New Zealand TV news around a month ago.
A sharp criticism of 24/7 was also provided in the article
[4#N3] entitled "Website woes haunt business
owners", from page B5 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, August 27, 2014). Finally, on 20 August
2014, the parent institution of 24/7 hosting ordered customers
to transfer their domains and web pages to other web hosts,
giving for it the deadline of 20 September 2014 (i.e. the date of
NZ elections). Since such a transfer involves the immobilization
of websites for unpredictable period of time, I would prefer to
be able to make it during the last day before the election, i.e.
on 2014/8/19 - when according to NZ election law the viewing
of my election web page, I would anyway have to voluntarily
immobilize. Unfortunately, over 5-day long loss of access to
my web page and my election email, started around 11 am
on Friday 2014/8/22, while lasting practically till afternoon on
Wednesday, 2014/8/27 (with a few-hours long break on late
afternoon of Monday 2014/8/25), causes that probably an
earlier transfer of my election web page becomes necessary -
and thus also an earlier endurance of the long lack of access
to this web page and email associated with this transfer. Of
course, experiences from my previous cases of failures of web
pages, caused that I prepared also another (spare) addresses
at which my election web pages are available, e.g. the address
pajak.org.nz/pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
Unfortunately, all of them could NOT be printed on my
election flyers from "Fig. #A1", and also it is quite difficult to find
them in Google (i.e. similarly like everything that works for morality
and for progress, and thus is subjected to the action of the moral
field). Thus voters do NOT know about the existence of this spare
address and probably they will NOT be able to find it. So, if you
are interested in regular checking of the content of this web page,
then I would suggest to write down the above address and use
it each time when the access to the domain www.pajak.org.nz
is cutt off. Alternatively you can copy to your computer the second
page of new version of my election flyer shown in "Fig. #M1",
on which the above address is already provided.
(2014/9/2)
Another failure of the 24/7 server hosting the domain www.pajak.org.nz.
On Tuesday morning, September 2, 2014, the access to my election
domain was cut off again. It exhausted my patience. So I asked
the person which finances for me this domain (and thus which has
all the parameters and passwords of this domain) to NOT wait until the
last day of the election campaign - as previously explained in (2014/8/24)
from this item, but to transfer immediately this domain onto a new server.
The transfer took place surprisingly quickly. The next morning the domain
already started to work on a new (different) server.
(2014/9/8)
Pictures of naked actresses which extinguished "Spark", and
with it also extinguished access to my election domain.
Unfortunately, an easy and massive access to my election domain
lasted only briefly. Already on Friday (2014/9/5) the number of
readers of my web page again fell sharply, while in the weekend
following that Friday only a few single persons managed to break
to it somehow. The reason was explained in the evening news from
TVNZ1 on Sunday (2014/9/7). It turned out that apparently a "hacker"
put on the internet photographs of naked Hollywood actresses, and
supposedly the stampede of New Zealand males to see these photos,
completely chocked the New Zealand largest telephone company
which now calls itself a "Spark", while formerly was called "Telecom".
The company connects to the Internet the majority of computers in
New Zealand - including the link to my election domain. So when
this "Spark" was extinguished, also extinguished was the possibility
to view my election web page. An interesting puzzle associated with
this extinguishing, which additionally reveals to us the power and
the capability of "moral field" action, was contained in the commentary
of TVNZ1 added to this news about the collapse of "Spark" services
under the onslaught of images of naked actresses bodies. Namely,
how did it happen that only the customers that "Spark" rushed to
see these pictures of naked actresses, while users of several other
companies that in NZ also provide computers with Internet connections,
did NOT cause at that time any interference to the operation of these
other companies? This puzzle reveals, that the "moral field" displays
an enormous sense of humour in some of its actions.
(2014/9/9-11)
The back pain. Beginning from Tuesday, 9 September 2014,
for the last three days (this entry was written on Thursday, 11
September 2014), every morning I wake up with a nasty back pain.
The pain arrived without any medical
reasons that would be known to me. It lasts entire days, causing
that my every move is a torment. NO heavy objects I lifted recently -
which lifting could explain the origin of this pain. Also the weather
is relatively warm lately, so that it cannot be responsible for the
origin of it. Thus, the only explanation for this pain is the obstructive
work of the "moral field". After all, because every my movement
intensifies the pain, it turns the distribution of leaflets virtually into
a torture. In addition, the pain causes that my posture is twisted
and my body is leaning, while when walking I must support the
back with my hands to ease the pain. The pain began on Tuesday,
when I just started the distribution of initial leaflets from the last
thousand of them. From my past experience I know that once
the pain starts in my back, then usually it lasts for many days.
In this case, it is sure that it will last at least until the day of election.
That is, it is to persist during the entire period of delivering the
last thousand of election flyers and also during that important
day, when I am to go to the ballot box to vote.
* * *
When I myself start to consider from a distance
that constant stream of "bad luck" and "troubles"
that flooded me from the moment when I decided
to stand to the election, then even for myself this
stream seems to simply be incredible and sometimes
even funny. However, according to my previous
research, it actually represents the action of
the "moral field" which aims to ensure that
every morally correct
action requires putting an effort (F) into it, which
is proportional to benefits (a) that will accrue to
the people (m) using the results of this action,
and also proportional to the number of people
(m) who would benefit from the success of this
action. In turn the fact, that these my
experiences with such enormously potent moral
field, allow me to get to know (and describe)
our God better and faster, and also the fact
that I fully understand and appreciate the need
for the existence and operation of the moral field,
does NOT eliminate the feeling in me, that the
moral field was completely overwhelming and
that it induced a feeling like a "hell opened up
beneath my feet". So now I am beginning to
understand why the intention of a peaceful
implementation of the required reforms is so
difficult and why people
who take up this intention can be equated to
"dentists who volunteered to dive into the ocean
to drill and to heal painful teeth of an irritated
powerful shark".
There is one aspect of the above events, which
stimulates me to philosophical thoughts and to
intensification of my research. It is the fact, that
in spite since 2007 I am equally sure that UFOnauts
are simulated by God only temporarily, as I am
also sure of the existence of one omnipotent God,
still God uses on me these simulations of UFOnauts
to form sections of the moral field. Because God does
not do anything without an important reason, I feel
that I have a duty to investigate why a sole awareness
that UFOnauts are divine simulations, does NOT
protect us against their harmful actions. As so far,
the most important thing that come on this issue
to my mind, is that by using simulations of UFOnauts
God tries to direct my attention to the fact, that the
majority of resistance of the moral field aimed at my
2014 election efforts does NOT originate from people,
but from what is solely under God's control (and
thus what - according to explanations from items
#J1, #L3 and #N2 of this web page, is a discreet
way of confirming for me which kinds of attributes
of the moral field allow us to recognise that a given
action runs against God's plans). Also, perhaps, in
this way God lets me understand, that He treats exactly
the same all people - regardless of their knowledge or
attitudes. Probably such a treatment is also to warn us,
that knowledge alone NOT supported by taking real
actions of defence, is NOT enough to protect against
evil. One can also guess, that by the rough treatment
of even those who know and respect, God is trying
to emphasize to us that at the time of judgement
of our behaviours (e.g. during the so-called "final
judgment") are NOT taken into account any of
our excuses or "mitigation circumstances", such
as "I wanted to do well while it just came out wrongly",
but judged are the bare facts of the moral consequences
of whatever we do.
#N4.
An example of personal delivering of election flyers, used as
illustration for choosing this solution, which climbs the most
steeply uphill in the "moral field" and thus generates the most
of long-term benefits but the least of undesirable "side effects":
Motto:
"The moral field is an indicator for these moral mechanisms
which cause that short-term hardship of the steep climbing
uphill in this field always generates the most of long-term
benefits and the least of undesirable side effects, while
momentary convenience of an easy and pleasant slipping
down in this field always cause long-term problems."
Prayers described in items #B1 and #M3 from
this web page most clearly have worked.
The first miracle
had already happen. After all,
in spite that I still maintain my "zero-dollar"
level of spending for the campaign, declared
and described in item #D2 from this web page,
starting from 19th June 2014 I have available
9999 election flyers of a superior quality,
described in (2014/5/28) from item #M2 of this
web page - in comparison to which the local
flyers of even candidates from a rich party look
like a very poor relatives. Imagine A5 size flyers
with particularly vibrant colours, on which the
set of my political goals of action that emotionally
moves almost every voter from the Hutt South,
was dressed in a wonderful graphical layout
shown in "Fig. #A1" and reproduced in "Fig. #M1",
then printed with a peak German printing technology
on chalk white ceramic paper "galaxi keramik"
of the world's best quality. The result is that I have
election flyers which attract the eye with their appearance
and vivid colours, offer an emotionally moving
content to the Hutt South voters, are very
pleasant to the touch, are not afraid of rain or
water, and in addition save our forests because
they are NOT printed on the paper from organic
matter, but on flexible ceramic leafs. If I myself
ordered the design and production of such flyers,
it would cost me a fortune - and of course, I would
NOT be able to afford it. So what particularly
captivated my heart, is that these flyers were designed,
printed in Germany, and sent me to New Zealand
as a gift, by a humble follower of totalizm who
meticulously pursues a command from the Bible,
to perform good deeds anonymously, so that
"do not let your left hand know, what your
right is doing" (The Bible, Matthew 6:3).
Therefore, this totalizt does NOT agree to even
reveal who he is and how he can be contacted. (The
philosophy of totalizm
explained "why" the Bible and totalizm recommend
such an anonymous carrying out good deeds - this
explanation is repeated, amongst others, in item #I1
and in the caption under "Fig. #I1" from this web page.
Namely, immoral persons
learning that someone known to them carried out a
good deed, or seeing someone doing a moral good
deed, generate in themselves so much envy and
other negative feelings, that the loss of "moral energy"
caused by these negative feelings can ruin a whole
goodness that these good deeds could bring.)
Having to my disposal the election flyers of so superior
quality, gives to me almost equal chances of winning
the upcoming elections, as the chances that have
candidates proposed by political parties. After all, the
flyers have the potential that from a scientist and a creator of the
philosophy of totalizm,
who remains almost unknown in the Hutt South electorate,
they transform me into a person whose existence and
goals are known to a sufficient number of voters. However,
a moral requirement is imposed onto this transforming.
Namely, I must now deliver these flyers to voters in the
most moral way - that is in the way which most steeply
climbs uphill in the so-called "moral field" (i.e. in the
invisible primary field similar to gravity, which is described
in items #D5, #F5, #I1, #J1, as well as in "part #N",
from this web page). As it is explained, among others, in the
introduction to this web page, the new "totaliztic science"
has determined that every real
problem, including the problem of dissemination of election
flyers, has a number of different solutions, while the
solution that brings the most of long-term benefits
and the least of undesirable side effects, is that one
which climbs the most steeply uphill in the "moral field".
In order to find that solution to a given problem,
which most steeply climbs uphill in the moral field,
we need to start from creating a list of known to
us, or possible, solutions for this problem. So in
the case of the problem discussed here, we should
use e.g. "brainstorming", our own analyses, or
research of behaviours of other politicians or countries,
to carry out a review of the ways in which election
flyers can be distributed to voters. Let us list here
the most common such ways. (1) Walking from
a house to a house and giving personally the election
flyers to hands of the voters. (2) Dropping
in person the flyers to mailboxes existing by homes
of New Zealand voters (in NZ mailboxes easily accessible
from the street are placed by footpaths on the
fence of the garden of each residential house).
(3) Hiring a special service that for a fee
delivers flyers to mailboxes from each house
in a given electorate. (4) Standing in areas
frequented by large numbers of people, e.g. at gates
of factories or on the main streets of the city, and
handing flyers to passers-by. (5) Sticking
flyers under windscreen wipers from cars in public
car parkings and at supermarkets. Etc., etc.
The next step is to select this solution which most steeply
climbs uphill in the moral field. The most easily such
choosing can done by matching all known solutions
that are available for us, with the so-called "indicators of the moral
correctness" discussed in item #J2 from this web page.
In the case of delivery of flyers, that most steeply climbing
solution turns out to be the way (1) of delivery - i.e. the
personal delivery of flyers directly to the hands of voters.
For example, it is the most difficult, while the so-called
"line of the least intellectual resistance" runs exactly
opposite to it. So it is that way (1) which provides the
largest number of long-term benefits and introduces
the smallest number of "side effects" - although in the
short term it is to require the largest contribution of the
intellectual, emotional, and physical work. Other ways
are less compatible with the criteria of morality. For example,
if I myself place flyers in mailboxes of voters according to
the way (2), then these flyers would met a fate similar to
any advertising material which is massively thrown into
these mailboxes. Namely, the majority of voters instead
of reading them, after removing them from mailboxes would
immediately throw them out with the trash - thus wasting
materials, human labour, and their own chances to gain
useful information. Of course, the candidates backed
by large political parties can afford such treatment of their
flyers - routinely disseminated for them throughout the
electorate according to the way (3) by appropriately paid
post office, or by company that delivers advertisements,
which place these flyers in mailboxes by homes of voters.
After all, when elections are already close, their political
parties will organize and pay additional televised debates,
newspaper advertisements and public meetings that will
remind the voters who are these party candidates. In contrast,
as an "Independent" candidate, behind who stands NO
political party, I cannot afford to pay additional television
appearances and newspaper advertisements. Thus, election
flyers are for me the only way to draw attention of the voters
to my candidacy and to goals that I would try to achieve in
the case of being elected to NZ parliament.
Theoretically speaking, it should NOT be difficult
to personally hand out 9999 flyers within 93 days
that are to pass from the date of receiving these
flyers until the date of election. After all, it would
be enough for me to deliver each day into the hands
of the voters about 108 flyers. Even while taking
into account the fact that I am still troubled by the
cough which stays from times of my vacation (see
(2014/5/1) in item #M2 from this web page), and
that in the current winter a cold rain falls during
more than a half of days in New Zealand, still I should
be able to distribute these flyers even while going
to deliver them only during every second day
(i.e. while there are breaks in the rain) and handing
out then around 216 flyers a day. From a childhood
in the rural Poland I remember that every rural
postman everyday distributed several times more
letters, and he also delivered them personally
directly into the hands of addressees.
In practice, however, the requirement of overcoming
the resistance of the moral field considerably complicates
such a personal distribution of flyers. It does NOT help
the knowledge that, as I am to explain it in this item, the
complication of delivery brings long-term benefits for
both me and for all other interested parties. This is because
the short-term resistance of the moral field is so large,
that it makes the personal distribution of flyers extremely
difficult. Thus, in our electorate this resistance makes
virtually impossible the personal distribution of flyers
by other candidates - thus giving me the chances to
effectively compete even with candidates from rich
political parties. Moreover, as I am to explain this later,
it makes voting results independent from the amount
of money that someone is to spend on the campaign,
and makes these results compatible with the state of
philosophy and morality of the community doing the
election. So in fact, the existence of this resistance of the
moral field makes me happy. Nevertheless, although
in my case this resistance evens my chances of winning
the election, at the same time because of it practically
only with a great difficulty I am able to deliver these
required about 108 flyers per day. In spite of the fact
that the delivery of these around 108 flyers per day takes
me only about three hours of time, it still leaves me
completely exhausted physically, mentally and emotionally.
Of course, I am very intrigued by the manner in which
the moral field turns so seemingly simple action, as the
personal delivery of election flyers, to become so immensely
difficult and exhausting. After all, in addition to being a
candidate to NZ parliament, I am still also the creator of the
philosophy of totalizm,
and a scientist seeking truths and popularizing truths.
Therefore, in this item I am going to try to objectively
identify and describe the mechanisms and tools by
means of which the moral field creates so much resistance
to people personally delivering election flyers, while at
the end of the description I am to try to summarize examples
of long-term benefits that arise from the existence of this
resistance. While reading these descriptions, however,
please note that the impartial describing of the complex
resistance of the moral field is quite difficult. Hence my
expressions may clumsily reflect a phenomenon, which
God has designed with the infinite genius, and which
outcome in the long-term actually works in favour of the
morally acting people. So if I reveal below the difficulties
with which I have to deal during the personal delivery of
these flyers, please do NOT take these descriptions for
my complaint or criticism. For I am delighted that such
difficulties exist, and thus that they are putting off other
candidates, that they level my chances, and that they are working
for justice. It is just that in order to enable the reader
to learn the truth about the mechanisms of work of
the moral field, in the following descriptions I tried to
reflect as faithfully and accurately the difficulties of
the delivery of election flyers, as only allowed me
my rather imperfect writing skills.
There is a whole set of complex reasons, why resistance
of the moral field can become so high that the seemingly
so simple action as a personal delivery of flyers directly to hands
of the voters may turn out to be so difficult and so demanding
on the contribution of all knowledge, all the energy, the whole
time, as well as the entire physical, mental and emotional
capabilities, that remain in my disposal. These reasons
cause, that after each delivery of flyers I am left completely
exhausted physically, mentally and emotionally. I will try to
systematically explain these reasons. The most important one
in my opinion, is the high consumption of actual physical
work required for such delivery, combined with my rather
NOT very high current physical fitness. The point is that
in order to be a scientist, almost automatically one have to
turn into a person once called a "bookworm". (Today, perhaps,
this name should include the word "computer".) After all,
the scientific research is tracking ideas and premises, analysing
them, drawing conclusions, writing down, transforming, etc.
All this is typically done while sitting. No wonder that my
muscles are NOT accustomed to long-term physical activity,
while the body is unused to rough treatment. Until the time,
however, of the receipt of flyers, I did NOT know about this.
In addition to such a NOT very high physical fitness, in action
are also other forms of resistance of the moral field, for
example a high level of intellectual contribution and constant
attention required during the delivery of flyers, while manifesting
itself NOT only in what one should say when delivering flyers
and in a kind of reactions of the recipients that one should
be prepared, but also in the organizing of this delivery, in
the choice of locations and streets receiving flyers, etc.
(After all, I do NOT have neither a sufficient number of
flyers, nor enough time to be able to deliver these flyers
to every household from the entire Hutt South electorate.)
In addition, the delivery is accompanied by a high mental
and emotional tension, and by physical readiness, reasons
for which will become clear after reading the rest of this item.
In a typical case of delivery of flyers to hands of
another voter, everything goes relatively easy and
should NOT induce exhaustion. This is because
typically one goes to the fence of a next house,
opens the gate which leads to the backyard patio,
walks along a sidewalk up to the door of the house,
knocks on the door or rings the doorbell (if there is
a doorbell), then, after the door is opened by a member
of the household one introduces himself to the voter,
handles out a flyer, politely discusses briefly the most
important election ideas with this household member,
explains the election goals and listening to his/her opinion
on the topics that the voter is interested in, shakes hands,
speaks farewell courtesies, leaves the garden, closes
the gate behind, and goes to the next house. But in
addition to these typical cases, there are exceptions.
These are they that exhaust physically, mentally and
emotionally the most. Probably also these exceptions
caused, that when I got these 9999 superiorly printed
election flyers described in (2014/5/28) from item #M2
of this web page, and when I started with hooves their
personal delivery, then, to my surprise, the first day I
discovered that my legs, muscles, mind and feelings
refused to obey me already after the delivery of only
about 100 flyers. So let us learn now how looks-like
the delivery of flyers in such exceptional cases.
While delivering flyers, these typical cases of going
from house to house, that I described in the previous
paragraph, from time to time are intertwined with
exceptional cases which require additional completion
of a wide range of various physically, mentally and
emotionally exhausting activities, and which are
implemented in a context of strong physical, mental
and nervous tension. For example, when one goes
to a next house typically firstly one needs to open
and then close a gate or a property-door behind.
Meanwhile, some of these turn out to be surprisingly
heavy, lacking the hinges, or jamming out. It can also amaze
the most diverse multitude of ways in which the locks
on these gates or property-doors can refuse to work, and the
number of trials as well as the level of engineering expertise
that are needed to succeed in opening them in spite
of their jam. Then one needs to find the entrance to
the house - while in typical New Zealand homes with
considerable gardens sometimes it is well hidden
behind trees and bushes, and occasionally requiring
walking at considerable distances within the garden.
While searching for the house entrance door one
must also look carefully and be aware of where exactly
the gate or door for escaping to street is located. This
is because sometimes pounces on us a dog (or dogs)
initially hidden in the bushes or flowers and waiting
for an opportunity to "play" with a visitor. From my former
rural life I remember that one should NOT turn the back
to a dog, because it will bite. Therefore, we must then
be ready to quickly switch our legs into a reverse gear,
after which we escape through the gate into the street,
running backward while defending ourselves from dog's
attempts to bite us, all the time facing the dog that attacked
us. When we finally manage to get to the front door of
the house, our "fun" also does NOT end. One has to
somehow communicate to occupants, that he is staying
in front of their door. But I quickly discovered that only
about 20% of homes in my electorate are having a working
doorbell or a rattle. As a result, on the second day of
delivering flyers, it turned out that all the joints of my
fingers become so sore from the constant knocking
to subsequent doors, that I was NOT able to continue
to knock with my fingers, while knocking with anything
else, e.g. with a cover of the pen, sounds amazingly
rude. (Some amongst houses NOT only that do NOT
have a working doorbell, but in addition they have
the sign "please do not knock" placed on their doors.)
If I can somehow attract occupants to the door, the
"fun" sometimes continues. After introducing ourselves
and presenting why we are visiting them, we can in
fact meet with every possible reaction. A lot of people
react very emotionally and vivid towards someone who,
like me, either tries to take away votes from their favourite political
party candidate, or insists on the moral goals of the actions - such
as my goals. Thus, in the delivery of flyers one not always
comes across people with which one can talk objectively
about the problems of the country and electorate, and
to learn what hurts voters and what we might try to change.
Often strikes us the reaction of impatience - when a given
voter acts as if he/she could not wait until we leave and he/she is
able to re-close the door. Out of unpleasant reactions,
for me personally the worst is when a household member
sarcastically or angrily states e.g. something along the
lines "I am NOT voting for independent candidates" and
then slams the door in front of my face. Although this
reaction occurs rarely, still in practically every day of
delivering flyers, it happens at least once - while for
some reasons I seem to be allergic for this kind of
reaction, thus it can spoil the rest of my day. (For me it feels
like a version of verbal bullying.) Not without reasons
the old Polish proverb states that "one spoon of tar
can spoil the whole barrel of honey". (Chinese express
the same idea with a more blunt proverb "one speck of
rat dung spoils a pan full of rice".) Relatively often no-one
opens the door - sometimes in spite of that we see or hear
that someone is still inside. In such a case we need to return
to the street and find a place where the mailbox for that
household is located - sometimes quite well disguised.
However, before throwing flyers into this mailbox, the
courtesy requires that we seek whether on it, or somewhere
near it, is written a request to NOT place in this mailbox
specific kinds of materials. If there is such a request,
we must deduce on the basis of our logic and knowledge,
whether the election flyers belong to this type of materials.
It is also amazing how often the moral field can hinder the
simple activity of throwing flyers into the mailbox. For example,
disproportionately often just before I start my rounds, the
same way as I is followed before by a carrier of advertising
materials which clog the mailboxes, so that for the placing
of my flyers without crushing them there is no space in the
mailbox, thus the delivery requires much more manipulations
than it should.
In addition to the above, a considerable amount
of tension and trouble cost me the quickly changing
weather of New Zealand. My preparation for the
elections of 2014 happens when in NZ is winter,
and when I still have unhealed cough. But the
current winter there is a cold rain virtually in more
than a half of each week, while the blowing of
strong winds makes it impossible to use an
umbrella. So for the person unaccustomed with
working under the "open sky" and not resistant
to colds, which I am, such cold rains and strong
winds make almost impossible to go out on the
street. Thus, I am forced to carry out the distribution
of flyers only when there is a break in the rain. Unfortunately,
the rapid changes in the local weather cause that
if there is a break in the rain, it is often difficult to
guess how long it is to last. So I have to use all
my knowledge of climate and all available help,
to predict the length of each break in the rain.
After all, potential voters to whom I deliver flyers
are scattered over a wide area (see item #C1 of
this web page), some of them living nearly 20
kilometres apart from my flat. Therefore, every
time I have to decide whether a break in the cold
rain will be long enough, so that I am NOT caught
in the rain when I reach by a bus the most remote
voters, or whether it will be short enough that
I should just hand out flyers close to my flat -
so that I can escape quickly when a cold rain
starts to fall. In addition, while delivering flyers
on cloudy days I also must continually watch
the weather to be able to escape on time when
I feel that a rain is approaching.
A significant dose of "fun" gives me also a structure
of streets in New Zealand towns. For me this structure
resembles winding mazes and traps that are described
in item #C4 of the web page named
petone.htm.
Thus, in connection with a chronic lack of architectural
"landmarks", with an almost identical appearance of
every street, and the need to distribute flyers in increasingly
different places depending on how long the expected break
between rains is to be, this labyrinthine structure of the
streets causes that it really is difficult to figure out which
streets have already received flyers, and also that it is
difficult to introduce some system and order to delivery
of flyers into hands of the voters.
When after about 3 hours of delivering of about
100 flyers, both my legs, and the rest of the body,
begin to refuse to obey me, typically in widely spread
towns of NZ these flyers are distributed only along
a single long street, or along two or three short streets.
Such insignificant outcomes and small progress, of
course, make me impatient. Therefore, in days when
the weather was rainless throughout the day, after
returning home, eating my lunch and a longer rest,
I tried to go out again to deliver another batch of flyers.
However, it turned out that the moral field was still
working. Although my muscles rested in the meantime,
my mind and my nerves still remained tired. As a result,
in spite that physically I still could deliver flyers, all my
behaviour, voice, and choice of words became a non-convincing,
tired and devoid of vigour. Hearing myself during these
secondary deliveries, I reached the conclusion that if I
was a recipient of my flyers, then probably the person
who served them to me, would NOT convince me at all
to vote for him. So after a time, I determined these secondary
deliveries to be so ineffective, that I abandoned them completely.
On weekdays, when throughout the entire day
a rainless weather is forecast, I have a choice to
either deliver flyers in the middle of the day, or
in evening. The point is that in the middle of the
day a lot of people are at work. So houses are
empty. After all, in NZ in most of homes live only
single marriages, both of participants of which
typically are at work, or even just live a single
person. So during the day a number of personal
deliveries is very low. In turn during evenings
people have already returned from work. It is
therefore a greater chance to find them at home.
In addition, during evenings it is easier to learn
whether someone is in the house, because one
can see the light. Unfortunately, the fact that
currently in NZ is winter, causes that darkness
falls soon after 4 pm. But most of working people
return home after 5 pm - as in NZ typical working
hours extend from 9 am to 5 pm. For reasons
which are described in item #A2 of this web
page, when it is very dark, people are reluctant
to open their home doors to a stranger. As a
result, both the daily delivery, and delivery in
evenings, have almost the same efficiency
when the ratio of successful deliveries is concerned.
In addition, the delivery when it is already dark,
exposes also me to various additional dangers -
and it is NOT only during deliveries in some
dark and forgotten streets. Thus, after several
attempts to deliver in evenings, I decided to
abandon the evening choice of time and
deliver flyers only in the middle of days.
When I still lived in Poland, I often saw postmen
when they delivered letters and handed them to
hands of recipients. At that time Poland homes
have NOT yet have letterboxes, so any correspondence
had to be delivered into hands of recipients. I had
no idea how tiring was the work of such postmen,
nor what difficulties they had to face in their daily
work. At that time I was also amused by these
numerous cartoons humorously showing dog
attacks on postmen as well as by trials and tribulations
of these postmen trying to deliver the mail to hands of
hard-accessible addressees. It was not until after
my experience with the personal delivery of election
flyers that suddenly I realized that these humorous
cartoons actually showed scenes inspired by events
from the real life. Thus, the distribution of flyers,
among others, increased also my respect which
I have for today's, and for former, postmen.
The philosophy of totalizm determined, that choosing
this solution to any problem (including the problem of
delivering election flyers), which climbs most steeply
uphill in the moral field, is to create the largest number
of long-term benefits and the smallest number of side
effects. (Notice here, that some side effects from the
selected here personal delivery of flyers, still are to exist,
because this solution still has a considerable inclination
towards the axis of feelings "Y" from "Fig. #I1".) So let
us list here, at least a few examples of these long-term
benefits. And so, for me very important benefit of such
a personal delivery of election flyers into hands of
voters, stems from the workload and features of this delivery.
After all, one has to have the health of a horse, physical
fitness of professional athlete, a lot of perseverance,
mental toughness, planning, ability to predict the weather,
the knowledge of a given locality, discernment of geographical
location, sense of direction, time, and a few others demanding
personal qualities, to be able to overcome significant resistance
of the moral field and actually deliver personally all the flyers
into the hands of the inhabitants of households of one's
electorate. This in turn means, that the personal delivery
of flyers improves and trains all of the above personal
qualities - after all, the "practice makes perfect".
Moreover, if the election is won
by such a candidate who in person delivers his flyers,
then it is certain that he actually deserved to win,
and also - if one shows enough of perseverance to personally
deliver election flyers to his voters, one is also going to have
enough perseverance to fulfil his election promises.
Another benefit gained by candidates personally delivering
own flyers, is that typical politicians who have NOT gone
through the hard school of life, will NOT be able to neither
take nor effectively implement such a personal delivery.
So through the introduction of resistance of the moral field,
God wisely and with foresight evens with this resistance,
among others, the chances of candidates who have
e.g. "zero-dollar" campaigns, such as mine, with the
chances of candidates from wealthy political parties.
The resistance of the moral field also generates benefits
for the community that is electing their representatives.
After all, when the chances of all candidates become
equal, then the election wins the candidate whose goals
and characteristics best overlap with the collective philosophy
and with the indications of conscience of the population
that these candidates are to represent later. So the
final effect of the work of resistance of the moral field,
turns out to be the shifting of decision for who is to win
the election, from the price, breadth and quality of someone's
election campaign, to the state of minds and group conscience
of all inhabitants of the electorate. Thus, the resistance of the
moral field serves also to justice. After all, when the decision
of who is to be chosen depends on the state of minds
and consciences of voters, then each
community shall always receive such leaders and rulers,
for which it deserves due to its philosophy and moral state -
which fact the findings of the philosophy of totalizm
have been trying to tell us for a long time.
Part #P:
Summary of findings of the philosophical nature
which were empirically collected as a result of
undertaking the actions described on this web page:
#P1.
In addition to political goals, my standing in
the elections of 2014 has also philosophical goals:
As the creator of morality-oriented
philosophy of totalizm,
I am NOT only interested in the experiences
and findings that may lead me to victory in
the elections, but also those that may increase
our philosophical knowledge and enrich the
pool of philosophical solutions offered by the
philosophy of totalizm, which have the potential
to improve the quality life of people practicing
totalizm. Therefore, during my election campaign
described on this web page, as an additional
non-political objective that I set for myself, is
to make intense philosophical fact-gathering.
Actually, I do hope, that this campaign will
be a kind of "empirical experiment in philosophy" -
which is to enrich totalizm. After all, in such
a case, even if I cannot achieve any political
goal that I imposed on myself, still my effort
will NOT be in vain because my participation
in these elections will help me to achieve my
goals relevant to the philosophy. In this "part #P"
of the web page I am going to systematically
summarize my fact-findings and developments
of a philosophical nature, that I have already
managed to accumulate.
#P2.
What from the philosophical area
I managed to note or establish during
my election campaign to-date:
The most interesting facts, findings and my
my discoveries related to this election, but
concerning the progress in philosophy, are:
(2014/3/22)
The huge apathy and resignation regarding the effectiveness
of the democratic process in NZ. This feeling of apathy
and resignation seems to emerge from the majority of personal
conversations with ordinary voters - about which I have already
mentioned in (2014/3/22) from item #M2 of this web page. They are also the first
impressions that strike the eye during such personal conversations.
Almost every voter with whom I spoke so-far states through
various wording, that whatever
"they" want to do, they still will do - no matter what actions
would have been taken to prevent it. I wonder if
this dominant opinion about the lack of efficiency of democratic
process in NZ is caused by the moves like the one to maintain
stubbornly that vigorously opposed by the majority of nation
"anti-smacking law" described in item #B5.1 from the web page named
will.htm.
If this situation is to continue and deepen, then the democratic
process may completely collapse in NZ one day - what practically would
spell life-shattering problems for all of us, as mentioned already in item
#K1 above.
(2014/4/15)
The fast growing public reluctance to have anything to do
with politics. During my "rounds" from house to house
on Tuesday, 15th April 2014, again I was struck by the number
of people who as soon as I introduced myself to them, they
informed me that matters of politics completely do NOT
interest them, after which informing they slammed the
door of their home in front of my nose. I must admit here,
that having doors slammed do NOT provide a pleasant
experience. And it turns out that there is unexpectedly many
of so acting people. Although in my "rounds" I do NOT have
my mind set on counting statistics, I got an impression
that almost a third of potential voters already belong in
NZ to that category. Such a large number of them caused
that I even began to wonder whether these reactions are
NOT by any chance a result of e.g. my appearance or
behaviour. After all, one cannot expect other people to
talk, or even just to listen, to someone whose appearance
or behaviour is NOT approved by them. Fortunately,
clearly God has decided to answer these my inner
doubts, because the next day I read a newspaper
article [1#P2] entitled "Has democracy
taken a dive?", from page A11 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Wednesday, April 16, 2014). In this
article has been clarified that in the previous NZ
elections of 2011, the number of people who voted,
fell to so shockingly low level, that this already makes
politicians taking notice of the fall. Also rapidly
is growing in NZ the number of such people, who
do NOT want to have anything to do with politics
and with politicians. After reading this article
I realized what is the real reason behind this slamming
of doors in front of my nose when I introduced
myself that I am going to stand as a candidate
for the incoming elections. I also reminded myself
what in various words repeated to me many of
those voters who do NOT avoid a conversation
with me. These their complaints quite clearly
indicate what the problem is with the democracy
in NZ, and how this problem can be remedied.
Let us hope, that I am elected to the parliament
to make something constructive with this problem,
before the deterioration of the situation in our
country brings about troubles that may ruin
our lives.
Part #R:
The final information:
#R1.
Summary of this web page:
No-one of us lives in a void, but lives among
other people who support us and supply us
in whatever we need. So we have towards
these other people an obligation to do
something also for their own good. But there
is no a better deed than adding our own
contribution in making life of people around
us, as well as the world, much better than
they were when we joined this physical world.
#R2.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
#R3.
I would suggest to return periodically to this web page in order to check further progress in my goals and efforts:
Up to the period immediately after the elections
(i.e. after 20 September 2014), when after adding
to this web page the final summary I intend to
return to temporarily suspended my standard
research and publishing, this web page
will be the most frequently and the most intensively
updated of all my web pages. Therefore,
I invite you to revisit it after some time from
now, in order to check out what is new on
the matter of elections discussed here, or
what new become already known to me.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
I have a pleasure to inform readers of my web
pages, that to commemorate the 70th birthday
of the author of this web page (i.e.
myself),
there was produced and published around 35
minutes long film by Dominik Myrcik, which
since May 2016 is available for free viewing in
youtube.com.
The film is entitled
"Dr Jan Pająk portfolio"
and it presents graphically most important among
my scientific accomplishments. I am inviting readers
to view it. The working
green links,
Internet addresses, promotional leaflets in three
languages, and complete descriptions of all three
language versions (i.e. English, German and Polish)
of this excellently designed and produced HD and HQ
film, are available on my web page named
portfolio.htm
especially prepared for describing it.
Readers wishing to write to me in any matter,
e.g. to give me an advice, to share with me their
opinion, to declare their assistance in matters
relating to elections described here, etc., can
direct their correspondence at any email address
that I use already for a long time, e.g. at the address
janpajak@gmail.com.
The full list of these addresses is provided in
item #L3 from my autobiographical web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm.
Unfortunately, due to the chronic lack of time
I am experiencing continually, typically I CANNOT
reply to every received email. After all, the days
have only 24 hours, while the majority of those
hours I must spend to achieve the most
important goals that I set to accomplish
on a given day.
* * *
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the Polish flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 25 March 2014
Date of the latest updating of this page: 29 February 2024
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
